Table 2 Binding data of 4 and 5 with copper(II) and nickel(II) in water
with the values obtained from the Stern–Volmer plots of the
emission spectra. Assuming a 1 : 1 complex agrees very well
with the obtained data. Apparently upon coordination to one
copper ion, the second binding pocket becomes too electron
poor to effectively bind another copper ion in aqueous
solution; it is not clear in how far the oligoethylene glycol
units partake in the binding of the copper.
Compound
Metala
4
4
5
Cu(II)
Ni(II)
Cu(II)
log K from absorptionb
log K from emissionc
2.83
3.18
3.17 ꢄ 0.01
2.96
2.71 ꢄ 0.03
2.70 ꢄ 0.01
The sulfate salt was used in all cases. Values obtained from the
a
b
deconvolution of the absorption spectra utilizing Datan software.14
In conclusion, we have prepared water-soluble bistriazoles 4
and 5 and the model compound 6a. From the combination of
spectroscopic and computational data, we can conclude that
the triazole-ring has a strong auxochromic effect and leads to
red-shifted spectroscopic features for the connected arene in
the 4-position, but at the same time is a poor electronic
conduit, as the spectroscopic properties of 6a are almost
identical to that of 4. The adducts 4 and 5 do not show large
solvent dependencies of their spectroscopic properties, and 4 is
surprisingly fluorescent in water and binds both copper and
nickel in aqueous solution. Overall, the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
of alkynes to azides is a superb tool to prepare functional,
metallo-responsive fluorophores.
c
Values obtained from fitting the quenching of the emission spectra
with eqn (1).
of Cu2+ or Ni2+ the charge transfer band in the absorption
spectra red-shifts (B20–30 nm) and the emission also
quenches (Fig. 2 and 3). Titrations of 4 and 5 with copper
sulfate and 4 with nickel sulfate in water were performed to
determine the strength of the binding.
Attempting to plot the fluorescence quenching spectra
according to the standard Stern–Volmer equation resulted in
significant deviation from linearity (see ESIw). However, the
data were well correlated when eqn (1) is employed,12,13
Ifinal ꢁ Io
We thank the Petroleum Research Funds for generous
funding. We would also like to thank A. J. Zucchero for
lifetime measurements and insightful discussions.
Iq ¼ Io þ
2
8
9
>
1
"
#
>
<
ꢀ
ꢁ
2
2=
½Qꢃ
1
½Qꢃ
1
½Qꢃ
½Fꢃ
ꢂ
1 þ
þ
ꢁ
1 þ
þ
ꢁ4
>
:
>
;
½Fꢃ KSV½Fꢃ
½Fꢃ KSV½Fꢃ
Notes and references
ð1Þ
1 R. Huisgen, G. Szeimies and L. Moebius, Chem. Ber., 1967, 100,
2494; R. Huisgen, R. Knorr, L. Moebius and G. Szeimies, Chem.
Ber., 1965, 98, 4014.
where Iq is the intensity of the fluorescence at a given quencher
concentration, Io is the initial fluorescence intensity of the
fluorophore, Ifinal is the final intensity of the fluorescence of the
quenched fluorophore, [Q] is the concentration of the quencher
added, [F] is the concentration of the fluorophore and Ksv is
the apparent Stern–Volmer constant.
2 J. F. Lutz, Angew. Chem., 2007, 46, 1018; W. H. Binder and
R. Sachsenhofer, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2007, 28, 15;
M. Meldal and C. W. Tornoe, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 2952.
3 H. C. Kolb and K. B. Sharpless, Drug Discovery Today, 2003, 8,
1128; R. L. Phillips, I. B. Kim, L. M. Tolbert and U. H. F. Bunz,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6952; R. L. Phillips, I. B. Kim,
B. E. Carson, B. Tidbeck, Y. Bai, T. L. Lowary, L. M. Tolbert and
U. H. F. Bunz, Macromolecules, 2008, 41, 7316.
4 B. C. Engert, S. Bakbak and U. H. F. Bunz, Macromolecules, 2005,
38, 5868; S. Bakbak, P. J. Leech, B. E. Carson, S. Saxena,
W. P. King and U. H. F. Bunz, Macromolecules, 2006, 39, 6793;
B. Erdogan, L. L. Song, J. N. Wilson, J. O. Park, M. Srinivasarao
and U. H. F. Bunz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 3678.
5 J. A. Opsteen and J. C. M. van Hest, Chem. Commun., 2005, 57.
6 D. Schweinfurth, K. I. Hardcastle and U. H. F. Bunz, Chem.
Commun., 2008, 2203.
7 J. N. Wilson and U. H. F. Bunz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
4124; A. J. Zucchero, J. N. Wilson and U. H. F. Bunz, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 11872; J. Tolosa, A. J. Zucchero and U. H.
F. Bunz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 132, 6498.
8 X. Y. Wang, A. Kimyonok and M. Weck, Chem. Commun., 2006,
3933; B. Happ, C. Friebe, A. Winter, M. D. Hager,
R. Hoogenboom and U. S. Schubert, Chem. Asian J., 2009, 4, 154.
9 C. G. Bangcuyo, U. Evans, M. L. Myrick and U. H. F. Bunz,
Macromolecules, 2001, 34, 7592.
The results of the titration are summarized in Table 2. The
binding of 4 to Ni(II) in water resulted in a binding constant of
log K = 3.17 ꢄ 0.01. The lower binding constant in com-
parison to Xie’s (log K = 4.48 ꢄ 0.03) is expected as the
titration was performed in water, which is a more competitive
ligating solvent than acetonitrile. The binding constant for
Cu(II) in water was slightly smaller in magnitude than that of
nickel with log K = 2.70 ꢄ 0.01.
The binding constant for the binding of copper to 5 was
determined to be log K = 2.71 ꢄ 0.03. This binding constant
was nearly identical to that of 4 which demonstrated the
independence of the binding upon the size of the aceno portion
of the core. Interestingly, the necessity of a stoichiometric
amount of copper in the synthesis of 4 and 5 can be attributed
to this high binding constant as once the triazole group is
formed, the effective concentration of free copper available to
catalyze the reaction is drastically reduced.
10 J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Springer,
New York, NY, 3rd edn, 2006.
11 J. A. Gonzlez-Vera, E. Lukovi and B. Imperiali, J. Org. Chem.,
2009, 74, DOI: 10.1021/jo901369k ASAP.
12 S. Maisonneuve, Q. Fang and J. Xie, Tetrahedron, 2008, 64, 8716.
13 R. L. Phillips, O. R. Miranda, D. E. Mortenson, C. Subramani,
V. M. Rotello and U. H. F. Bunz, Soft Matter, 2009, 5, 5042.
Binding constants were also obtained from the deconvolution
of the absorption spectra from the titration of the metal
utilizing Datan software.14 In all cases, the constants obtained
from the absorption spectra were in good to excellent agreement
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 1419–1421 | 1421