units require, in addition to a rigid scaffold, robust and
synthetically accessible functional units.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1 and 2
Dithienylethenes show remarkable photo- and electro-
chromic behavior that can be tuned readily through synthetic
modification. Importantly, they show often excellent pho-
tostationary states, reversibility of switching, and high fidelity
between open (colorless) and closed (colored) forms upon
irradiation with UV and visible light, respectively.7 In
addition, the dithienylethene unit shows bidirectional redox-
driven switching both intrinsically8 and through appended
redox-active units.9 The versatility of dithienylethene subunits
as components for functional materials has been demon-
strated already7 and allows for reversible photochemical
control of properties as diverse as fluorescence,10 self-
assembly,11 and molecular conductivity.12 In designing a
multichromophoric array, an important consideration is
interchromophore interactions and their effect on the ef-
ficiency of photo- and electrochemical switching.
Multicomponent molecular systems for multimode switch-
ing based on the dithienylethene photochromic unit have been
reported recently where two or more switches are connected
covalently via a single methylene,13 ethynylene,14 diyne,15
phenylene,16 or silyl17 bridge. The photochemical properties
of these multicomponent systems have proven to be sensitive
to the nature of the bridging unit ranging from complete
inhibition of double ring closing13-15 to a complete absence
of interaction and hence ring closure of all units.16,17 A key
challenge is therefore to achieve a high density of switching
units in a controlled spatial arrangement without affecting
the individual switching properties of the constituent units.
Here we report the synthesis, photo- and redox chemistry
of star-shaped dithienylethene-substituted hexaphenylben-
zenes 1 and 2 (Scheme 1), prepared via cobalt-catalyzed
cyclotrimerization of alkynes, in which six (1, 2) or one (3)
photochromic units are connected around a central benzene
core. Importantly the photo- and electrochemical behaviors
of the dithienylethene photochromic units are unaffected
when held in the six-fold symmetric molecular arrangement
despite the individual switching units being in proximity.
Compound 3, in which only one dithienylethene unit is
attached to a hexaphenylbenzene core, was prepared by
treatment18 of dithienylethene 4 with t-BuLi at ambient
temperature. This was followed by reaction with tri-n-
butylborate to generate a boronic acid intermediate, which
was reacted immediately with iodohexaphenylbenzene19
5
in the presence of a palladium catalyst to yield 3 (51%). A
similar approach using a six-fold Suzuki coupling reaction
with hexakis-bromo-hexaphenylbenzene and the boronic ester
prepared from dithienylethene 4 (even with 12 equiv of the
boronic acid) resulted in recovery of starting materials and
a mixture of regioisomers. Cobalt-catalyzed cyclotrimeriza-
tion,20 a well-known method for the synthesis of hexaaryl-
benzenes with diverse substituents, typically proceeds in good
yields, even where the substituents are dendrons with large
molecular volumes.21 In the present study, this route proved
equally effective and provided direct access to hexaphenyl-
benzenes 1 and 2 in good yield (Scheme 1). Treatment18 of
dithienylethene 4 with t-BuLi and subsequent reaction with
tri-n-butylborate generated a boronic acid intermediate, which
was reacted with 4-bromo-4′-iodobiphenyl22 in the presence
of a palladium catalyst to yield compound 6 in 74% yield.
The introduction of a branched alkyl chain was achieved by
demethylation of compound 6 with boron tribromide, fol-
lowed by ether formation using (S)-1-bromo-3,7-dimethy-
loctane, to yield dithienylethene monomer 7 in 57% overall
isolated yield.
(7) (a) Irie, M. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1685–1716. (b) Feringa, B. L.
Molecular Switches; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001. (c) Tian, H.;
Yang, S. J. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33, 85–97.
(8) (a) Peter, A.; Branda, N. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3404–
3405. (b) Peters, A.; Branda, N. R. Chem. Commun. 2003, 4, 954–955. (c)
Browne, W. R.; de Jong, J. J. D.; Kudernac, T.; Walko, M.; Lucas, L. N.;
Uchida, K.; van Esch, J. H.; Feringa, B. L. Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11, 6414–
6429. (d) Browne, W. R.; de Jong, J. J. D.; Kudernac, T.; Walko, M.; Lucas,
L. N.; Uchida, K.; van Esch, J. H.; Feringa, B. L. Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11,
6430–6441.
A Stille coupling reaction23 was used instead in the
synthesis of bis-dithienylethene acetylenes 8 and 9. Bis-
(tributylstannyl)acetylene served as the linker for 2 equiv of
either 6 or 7. The bis-dithienylethene acetylenes 8 and 9 were
(9) Kawai, S. H.; Gilat, S. L.; Ponsinet, R.; Lehn, J.-M. Chem.sEur. J.
1995, 1, 285–293.
(10) Irie, M.; Fukamito, T.; Sasaki, T.; Tamai, N.; Kawai, T. Nature
2002, 420, 759–760.
(11) de Jong, J. J. D.; Lucas, L. N.; Kellogg, R. M.; van Esch, J. H.;
Feringa, B. L. Science 2004, 304, 278–281.
(18) See Supporting Information.
(19) Shen, X.; Ho, D. M.; Pascal, R. A., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 5798–5805.
(12) (a) Dulic, D.; van de Molen, S. J.; Kudernac, T.; Jonkman, H. T.;
de Jong, J. J. D.; Bowden, T. N.; van Esch, J. H.; Feringa, B. L.; van Wees,
B. J. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2003, 91, 207402. (b) Kronemeijer, A. J.; Akkerman,
H. B.; Kudernac, T.; van Wees, B. J.; Feringa, B. L.; Blom, P. W. M.; de
Boer, B. AdV. Mater. 2008, 20, 1467–1473.
(20) (a) Kotha, S.; Bragurthi, E.; Lahiri, K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
4741–4767. (b) Geng, Y.; Fechtenkotter, A.; Mu¨llen, K. J. Mater. Chem.
2001, 11, 1634–1641.
(21) (a) Hecht, S.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4984–
4085. (b) Hanh, U.; Maisonhaute, E.; Amatore, C.; Nierengarten, J.-F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 951–954.
(13) Peter, A.; Branda, N. R. AdV. Mater. Opt. Electron. 2000, 10, 245–
249.
(14) Kaieda, T.; Kabatake, S.; Miyasaka, H.; Marukami, M.; Iwai, N.;
Nagata, Y.; Itaya, A.; Irie, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2015–2024.
(15) Yagi, K.; Irie, M. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32, 848–849.
(16) (a) Matsuda, K.; Irie, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9896–9897.
(b) Kobatake, S.; Irie, M. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 8359–8364.
(17) Areephong, J.; Browne, W. R.; Feringa, B. L. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2007, 5, 1170–1174.
(22) Moroda, A.; Togo, H. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 12408–12414.
(23) The synthesis of 8 and 9 using a modification of the one-pot
Sonogashira coupling procedure of Grieco and co-workers was employed
initially. However, in our hands, this method provided lower yields; 18%
yield of 8. Mio, M. J.; Kopel, L. C.; Braun, J. B.; Gadzikwa, T. L.; Hull,
K. L.; Brisbois, R. G.; Markworth, C. J.; Grieco, P. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 4,
3199–3202.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 9, 2010
2133