D. Menche et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 939–941
941
Table 1
observed. Truncation of the side chain leads to significant loss of
activity, which suggests this must be part of the pharmacophore
region and the complete loss of activity for a contracted macrocy-
clic analogue (14) indicates a significance of the authentic core for
biological potency. In total, these results will be helpful in design-
ing further SAR-studies and the development of potent but more
stable as well as simplified analogues, to further advance the
development of these macrolide antibiotics.
Antimicrobial activity of simplified etnangien analogues (13, 14, 17) in comparison to
etnangien (1) and its methyl ester (2)
Test organism
MICa
(lg/mL)
1
2
13
14
17
Staph. aureus
Micrococcus luteus
Escherichia coli
Corynebact. glutamicum
Mycobact. phlei
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
1
2.5
>20
>20
>20
10
20
>20
>20
>20
>20
20
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
10
20
>20
0.06
>80
0.03
0.12
>80
0.39
>20
0.24
n.d.
>40
Acknowledgements
a
Experiments were run in duplicates or triplicates.
Financial support from the DFG and the Wild-Stiftung is most
gratefully acknowledged.
Our recently reported route10 to 16 from acid 8 and vinylic io-
References and notes
dide 15 opened the possibility of also elaborating a more closely
related analogue (see Scheme 2). Selective deprotection proved
again challenging, even more so due to the lability of the liberated
terminal homoallylic alcohol, which was prone to various decom-
position pathways. As before, TBS-deprotection could only be
effectuated in a practical and reliable fashion by use of buffered
TBAF solution, giving the desired analogue with acceptable
yields.15
1. Höfle, G.; Reichenbach, H.; Irschik, H.; Schummer, D. German Patent DE 196 30
980 A1: 1-7 (5.2.1998).
2. Irschik, H.; Schummer, D.; Höfle, G.; Reichenbach, H.; Steinmetz, H.; Jansen, R. J.
Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1060.
3. For a review on myxobacterial polyketides, see: Menche, D. Nat. Prod. Rep.
2008, 25, 905.
4. O’Neill, A.; Oliva, B.; Storey, C.; Hoyle, A.; Fishwick, C.; Chopra, I. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 3163.
5. Haebich, D. V.; Nussbaum, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3397.
6. Campbell, E. A.; Pavlova, O.; Zenkin, N.; Leon, F.; Irschik, H.; Jansen, R. EMBO
2005, 24, 674.
The potent antibiotic activity of etnangien based on RNA-poly-
merase inhibition prompted us to likewise analyze the foregoing
analogues for their antimicrobial potential. Table 1 summarizes
their inhibitory activities against different microorganisms, in di-
rect comparison to etnangien (1) and its methyl ester (2). As ex-
pected, bacteria belonging to the Corynebacterineae, such as
Nocardia corallina and some Mycobacteria, were particularly sensi-
tive to 1 and 2, while yeast and Gram-negative Escherichia coli
proved to be rather resistant. Possibly, this may be correlated with
the Gram-negative nature of the producing myxobacterium.1,2 In
agreement with these data, the novel analogues showed likewise
no antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative E. coli and the
yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, a slight activity against
Corynebact. glutamicum and Mycobact. phlei. was observed for 13
and 17. In both cases, the inhibition was 40–300-fold smaller as
compared to 1 and 2, which suggests that the side side-chain is
part of the pharmacophoric region. No activity was observed for
analogue 14 bearing a contracted macrocycle, indicating that the
authentic ring size also is of importance for biological potency.
To further evaluate these data, the stability of etnangien (1) and
its methyl ester (2) was studied. Firstly, the stability of the com-
pounds under various pH-values in solution was evaluated. While
considerable degrees of decomposition were observed for 1 and 2
at very low (pH >3) and high pH-values (pH >10), both compounds
were stable under netural conditions and can be conveniently
stored at pH 7 in dark vessels in solution. Furthermore, the integ-
rity of etnangien methyl ester was evaluated under assay-type
conditions, by HPLC–MS analysis, revealing no signs of conversion
to the parent natural product, demonstrating the observed potency
of 2 was not caused by intermediate conversion to the parent nat-
ural product by ester cleavage. Furthermore, only very low degrees
of isomerisation of 2 were detected (<5%) even after prolonged
times (48 h). These results demonstrate that it is indeed possible
to modify and stabilize the etnangien structure, yet still retain
activity.
7. Parenti, F.; Lancini, G. In Antibiotic and chemotherapy; O’Grady, F., Lambert, H.
P., Finch, R. G., Greenwood, D., Eds.; Churchill Livingstone: New York, 1997; pp
453–459.
8. Menche, D.; Arikan, F.; Perlova, O.; Horstmann, N.; Ahlbrecht, W.; Wenzel, S. C.;
Jansen, R.; Irschik, H.; Müller, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14234.
9. For synthetic studies, see: (a) Arikan, F.; Li, J.; Menche, D. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
3521; (b) Li, J.; Li, P.; Menche, D. Synlett 2009, 2417; (c) Li, J.; Menche, D.
Synthesis 2009, 11, 1904.
10. Total synthesis: Li, P.; Li, J.; Arikan, F.; Ahlbrecht, W.; Dieckmann, M.; Menche,
D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11678.
11. 10,000 step conformational searches were carried out with the generalized
Born/surface area (CB/SA) solvent model and solution conformation data 18 as
input geometries: (a) Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G. J.; Guida, W. C.; Kiskamp,
R.; Lipton, M.; Caufield, C.; Chang, G.; Hendrickson, T.; Still, W. C. J. Comput.
Chem. 1990, 11, 440; (b) Still, W. C.; Tempczyk, A.; Hawley, R. C.; Hendrickson J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6127.
12. Aldehyde 3 was obtained in four steps from a known alkene, compound 18 in
Ref. 10, by ozonolysis with reductive work-up, Bz-protection, TBS-deprotection
and oxidation to the aldehyde.
13. Evans, D. A.; Chapman, K. T.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3560.
14. All new compounds had spectroscopic data in full support of the assigned
structures. 1H NMR spectroscopic data:
Compound 13: 1H NMR (600 MHz, acetone-d6) d = ppm 0.97 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H),
0.97 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.03 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 1.40–1.60
(m, 6H), 1.64 (m, 3H), 1.83 (m, 1H), 1.87 (m, 3H), 2.25 (m, 1H), 2.31 (m, 1H),
2.36 (m, 2H), 2.46 (m, 1H), 3.23 (m, 1H), 3.28 (s, 3H), 3.32 (dd, J = 9.3, 6.2 Hz,
1H), 3.43 (dd, J = 9.2, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.44 (m, 1H), 3.52 (m, 1H), 3.60 (m, 2H), 3.78
(s, 3H), 4.16 (m, 1H), 4.40 (s, 2H), 5.23 (m, 1H), 5.40 (ddd, J = 10.4, 7.9, 7.9 Hz,
1H), 5.77 (m, 1H), 6.08 (pseudo-t, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (dd, J = 14.3, 10.6 Hz,
1H), 6.90 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.2 Hz, 2H); ESI-HRMS calcd
for C36H58NaO9 [M+Ma]+: 657.3979, found: 657.3984. Compound 14: 1H NMR
(600 MHz, acetone-d6) d = 0.81 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.98
(d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.10 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.47–1.64 (m, 7H), 1.74 (m, 2H), 1.83
(m, 2H), 2.13 (m, 1H), 2.19 (m, 2H), 2.34 (dd, J = 13.9, 10.8 Hz, 1H), 2.39 (m, 1H),
2.47 (m, 1H), 2.48 (dd, J = 13.9, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 3.14 (m, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 3.40 (dd,
J = 9.1, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 3.51 (dd, J = 9.1, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (m, 1H), 3.63 (dd, J = 10.5,
2.3 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.81 (dd, J = 9.4, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 3.97 (m, 1H), 4.42 (s, 2H),
5.29 (tt, J = 9.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (ddd, J = 10.4, 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.75 (ddd,
J = 15.4, 9.2, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 5.98 (pseudo-t, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H), 6.34 (dd, J = 14.5,
10.7 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H); ESI-HRMS calcd for
C36H58NaO9 [M+Ma]+: 657.3979. found: 657.3986. Compound 17: 1H NMR
(600 MHz, acetone-d6) d = 0.83 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.94
(d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.30–1.46 (m, 6H), 1.63 (m, 1H),
1.66 (m, 3H), 1.78 (s, 3H), 1.81 (m, 1H), 1.90 (m, 1H), 2.01 (m, 1H), 2.24 (m, 1H),
2.30 (m, 1H), 2.36 (dd, J = 15.5, 10.1 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (dd, J = 15.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 2.48
(m, 1H), 3.23 (m, 1H), 3.28 (s, 3H), 3.50 (d, J = 10.2 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (m, 1H), 3.61
(d, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (dd, J = 9.2, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (d, J = 4.44 Hz, 1H), 3.99 (d,
J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.15 (m, 1H), 4.37 (ddd, J = 9.0, 8.3,
4.6 Hz, 1H), 5.40 (ddd, J = 9.9, 8.3, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (m,
1H), 5.77 (m, 1H), 5.80 (dt, J = 15.6, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 6.09 (dd, J = 10.8, 10.8 Hz, 1H),
6.27 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (dd, J = 15.2, 10.8 Hz, 1H); LC–ESIMS calcd for
C37H62NaO9 [M+Na]+: 673.4. found: 673.5.
In conclusion, based on molecular modeling and stabilization
considerations, we have developed a first series of simplified ana-
logues of the etnangiens with simplified side-chains and/or con-
tracted macrolactone ring. The synthesis of these compounds
was enabled in a convergent manner by late stage-diversification
using different southern ring fragments. During preparation of
these compounds a strong tendency of these macrolides towards
translactonization processes under basic or adidic conditions was
15. Removal of the acetonide could not be effected without extensive
decomposition.