tallization from pentane, the only purification step en route
to 6. It is interesting to mention that in contrast to the
cleavage of the dimethyl ketal of oxetan-3-one,1a formation
of 6 from its acetal can be conducted at high concentrations
and is complete within 3 h.
In parallel with the synthetic efforts toward these novel
building blocks, we are interested in examining and defining
the conformational preferences of these unusual ring systems.
In this regard, we have embarked on the preparation of
derivatives that could be crystallized and subjected for X-ray
crystallographic analysis. To our delight, N-benzyl-protected
sulfone 17 solidified upon standing and was successfully
crystallized from hexanes/CH2Cl2. Spirocyclic compounds
4 and 20 were transformed into the corresponding crystal-
line p-bromobenzoates 24 and 25 (Scheme 4). 6-Oxa-1-
Amino alcohols 11-14 were obtained in high yields
following conjugate addition of N-benzylamine and ester
reduction. In the case of thietane 12, oxidation to sulfone
15 (H2O2/Ti(OiPr)4)13 prior to ring closure was found to be
necessary. Cyclization using PPh3/CBr4 and base (Et3N or
K2CO3) then provided 16-19. Oxetane 20 was obtained in
one step from protected azetidin-3-one 1 using a “double
Corey-Chaykovsky” methylene insertion reaction.14 Sub-
sequent to their preparation, stability tests have revealed that
16-18, 24, and 25 remained essentially unaffected under
stirring with 0.5 M HCl in THF/H2O for several hours, as
Scheme 4
.
Synthesis of p-Bromobenzoates for X-ray
Crystallographic Analysis
1
assayed by H NMR spectroscopy and reisolation of the
starting material.
In order to showcase the utility of the synthetic sequences
and because we anticipate use of these novel modules, 1,6-
diazaspiro[3.3]heptane 1615 was conveniently prepared on
a preparative scale (15 g). The fact that the nitrogens are
orthogonally protected in 16 enable different groups to be
appended at each locus. Thus, it is readily converted to the
monoprotected oxalate salts 22 and 23 (Scheme 3) that in
Scheme 3. Formation of Stable Oxalate Salts
azaspiro[3.3]heptane 18 and 23 were also tranformed into
crystalline amides 27 and 26.
Figure 2 displays the crystal structures of compound pairs
24/25 and 26/27 as well as of N-benzylamine 17. Marked
ring puckering is observed for the azetidine ring (ꢁ ) 27°)
in 17 and the dioxothietane rings of 17 (ꢁ ) 28°) and 24
(ꢁ ) 21°); all other four-membered heterocycles in this study
can be considered essentially flat (ring puckering <7°).
It has been shown that carboxamides of azetidines tend
to be pyramidalized,17 a trend we also observed in the solid-
state structure of 24 and 25. In the case of 24, the sum of
the three valence angles around the nitrogen atom (θ) is
344.7°, a noticeable discrepancy from 360° for the ideal
planar amide. The hinge angle R, defined as the angle
between the C-NsC plane and the N-C(carbonyl) bond,
was calculated for 24 to be 148.4°, differing greatly from
the ideal 180° for planar amide groups. The amide group
geometry in 25 follows this tendency as well (θ ) 354.2°,
R ) 160.9°). If the amide is situated in the 1-position of the
turn can be directly used for many amine functionalization
reactions such as arene aminations, as previously reported
by us on a 2,6-diazaspiro[3.3]heptane.16 It is worth noting
that these ammonium salts are bench-stable compounds that
can be stored for several months without noticeable change.
(10) For compound 9, see ref 1. Cyclobutane 10 is known; see, e.g.:
Afzal, M.; Walton, J. C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 93, 937–
945.
(11) (a) Katritzky, A. R.; Cundy, D. J.; Chen, J. J. Heterocycl. Chem.
1994, 34, 271–275. (b) Axenrod, T.; Watnick, C.; Yazdekhasti, H. J. Org.
Chem. 1995, 60, 1959–1964. (c) Singh, A.; Sikder, N.; Sikder, A. K. Indian
J. Chem. 2005, 44B, 2560–2563.
(12) (a) Mayer, R.; Funk, K. F. Angew. Chem. 1961, 73, 578–579. (b)
Kozikowski, A. P.; Fauq, A. H. Synlett 1991, 783–784. (c) Maheshwari,
K. K.; Berchtold, G. A. J. Chem. Soc. D, Chem. Commun. 1969, 13.
(13) Hutton, C. A.; Jaber, R.; Otaegui, M.; Turner, J. J.; Turner, P.;
White, J. M.; Bacskay, G. B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2002, 1066–
1071.
(14) (a) Okuma, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Kaji, S.; Ohta, H. J. Org. Chem. 1983,
48, 5133–5134. For an enantioselective synthesis of oxetanes, see: (b) Sone,
T.; Lu, G.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
1677–1680.
(17) See, for example: (a) Otani, Y.; Nagae, O.; Naruse, Y.; Inagaki,
S.; Ohno, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yamamoto, G.; Uchiyama, M.; Ohwada, T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15191–15199. (b) For a general discussion
about nonplanar amides, consider: Winkler, F. K.; Dunitz, J. D. J. Mol.
Biol. 1971, 59, 169–182.
(15) Although the preparation of 16 was not reported, it was suggested
as a bifunctional scaffold: Stocks, M. J.; Wilden, G. R. H.; Pairaudeau, G.;
Perry, M. W. D.; Steele, J.; Stonehouse, J. P. Chemmedchem 2009, 4, 800–
808.
(18) Ohwada, T.; Okamoto, I.; Shudo, K.; Yamaguchi, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 7877–7880.
(19) See ref 18: N-tosylaziridine (θ ) 291.2°, R ) 120.5°), N-
tosylazetidine (θ ) 338.8°, R ) 142.75°).
(16) Burkhard, J.; Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3525–3526.
1946
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 9, 2010