cently, our group demonstrated that an efficient and stere-
oselective R-alkylation of N-sulfinyl imidates can be achieved
leading to chiral R-substituted N-sulfinyl imidates as useful
intermediates in the synthesis of enantiopure amides and
esters.6 Therefore, we envisioned that the addition reaction
of chiral N-tert-butanesulfinyl imidates across aromatic
N-tosyl aldimines could be a valuable alternative approach
toward the synthesis of ꢀ-aryl-R-methyl-substituted ꢀ-amino
acid derivatives, and the results are described herein. The
interest of this study not only arises from the fact that a new
and complementary entry toward chiral ꢀ-aryl-R-methyl-
substituted ꢀ-tosylamino acid derivatives, a synthetically
interesting class of compounds,7 will become accessible, but
also previously unreported optically pure ꢀ-sulfonylamino
imidates, which could serve as valuable chiral building blocks
for biologically active compounds,8 will be synthesized.
Whereas enolate additions across sulfinylimines has proven
to be a powerful method for the asymmetric synthesis of
various ꢀ-amino acids,2d,9 metalloenamines derived from
N-sulfinyl ketimines have been exploited to a limited extent
in Mannich-type additions across imines.10 Trans-2-ami-
nocyclopentane carboxylic acid has been prepared via an
intramolecular self-condensation of the bis-sulfinyl imine
derived from hexanedial.11 Deprotonation of the N-sulfinyl
ketimine derived from ketones and diastereoselective Man-
nich-type reaction with N-sulfonyl aldimines afforded ꢀ-ami-
no imines that were transformed into enantiomeric ꢀ-ami-
noketones and 1,3-diamines.12 The electron-withdrawing
character of the sulfinyl moiety strongly attenuates the
nucleophilicity of the metalloenamine, and therefore, the
more nucleophilic metalloenamines derived from N-tert-
butanesulfinyl amidines,13 and N-tert-butanesulfinyl imidates6
have been exploited advantageously in R-alkylation reactions
and is herein used for asymmetric Mannich-type reactions
to ꢀ-amino acid derivatives.
The addition reaction of N-sulfinyl imidate 1 with N-tosyl
aldimines 2 was optimized by systematically changing the
reaction conditions in the addition reaction of imidate 1 with
aldimine 2a (X ) Cl) for the synthesis of ꢀ-(sulfonylami-
no)sulfinylimidates 3a (Table 1 and Supporting Information
Table S1). The synthesis of N-sulfinyl imidate 1 was
performed by condensation of (RS)-tert-butanesulfinamide
and 1,1,1-trimethoxypropane with a catalytic amount of
p-TsOH without solvent.6,13 An initial attempt using similar
reaction conditions as applied in the synthesis of ꢀ-amino-
sulfonylimidates,4b namely reaction of imidate 1 with aldi-
mine 2a in the presence of a catalytic amount of DBU in
DMF, did not result in the formation of addition products,
even after prolonged stirring at room temperature (see
Supporting Information Table S1). Subsequently the use of
LDA to deprotonate imidate 1 gave no reaction with aldimine
2a at -78 °C, while increasing the temperature to 0 °C for
3 h led to a mixture of unidentified compounds. The use of
2.0 equivalents LiHMDS to deprotonate N-sulfinyl imidate
1 at -78 °C resulted, after addition of aldimine 2a and
reaction at -78 °C for 1 h in full conversion to ꢀ-(sulfo-
nylamino)sulfinylimidates 3a with high relative stereocontrol
(anti/syn ) 93/7) and moderate absolute stereocontrol in the
formation of the anti-adducts (see Supporting Information
1
Table S1). By H NMR analysis of the crude reaction
mixture, only three diastereomers could be detected, namely
(RS,S,R)-anti-3a/(RS,R,S)-anti-3a/(RS,S,S)-syn-3a in a 67/26/7
ratio. Better results were obtained when less equivalents of
LiHMDS (1.2 equiv) were used leading to complete relative
anti-diastereoselectivity and acceptable absolute stereocontrol
((RS,S,R)-anti-3a/ (RS,R,S)-anti-3a ) 75/25) leading to opti-
cally pure ꢀ-(sulfonylamino)sulfinylimidates (RS,S,R)-anti-
3a and (RS,R,S)-anti-3a in 59% and 21% yield, respectively,
after flash chromatography (entry 1). Analogously, several
other new chiral imidates 3 were prepared with excellent
anti-diastereoselectivity (anti/syn ) 93/7 to >99/1) and good
yields (84-87%) using the latter optimized reaction condi-
tions (entry 2 and 3). When the addition reaction was
performed with aldimine 2b (X ) H) derived from benzal-
dehyde, ꢀ-(sulfonylamino)sulfinylimidate (RS,S,S)-syn-3b
could also be isolated by flash chromatography in 5% yield.
Noteworthy, the addition reaction of imidate 1 with aldimine
2c (X ) OMe) led to a reversed absolute anti-stereocontrol
with ꢀ-(sulfonylamino)sulfinylimidate (RS,R,S)-anti-3c as
major product. The use of KHMDS as a base led to a
significant decrease in relative stereocontrol (anti/syn ) 75/
25) with an improved absolute stereocontrol of the R-methyl-
substituted center (entry 4). The use of NaHMDS led also
to a decrease in relative stereocontrol (anti/syn ) 73/27)
without an improved absolute stereocontrol (entry 5). The
addition of ZnCl2 or HMPA, or the use of toluene instead
of THF, did not improve the diastereoselectivity of the
reaction (see Supporting Information Table S1). In a last
(5) Van Nguyen, H.; Matsubara, R.; Kobayashi, S. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 5927.
(6) Colpaert, F.; Mangelinckx, S.; Verniest, G.; De Kimpe, N. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 3792.
(7) For enantioselective synthesis of ꢀ-aryl-R-methyl-substituted ꢀ-to-
sylamino acid derivatives, see: (a) Davis, F. A.; Qui, H.; Song, M.;
Gaddiraju, N. V. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 2798. (b) Davis, F. A.; Song, M.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2413. (c) Raheem, I. T.; Jacobsen, E. N. AdV. Synth. &
Cat. 2005, 347, 1701. (d) Ma, Z. H.; Zhao, Y. H.; Jiang, N.; Jin, X. L.;
Wang, J. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3209. (e) Roos, G. H. P.;
Balasubramaniam, S. Synth. Commun. 1999, 29, 755. (f) Kashima, C.;
Fukasaka, K.; Takahashi, K. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1997, 34, 1559. (g) Davis,
F. A.; Reddy, G. V.; Liang, C.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5139. (h)
Abrahams, I.; Motevalli, M.; Robinson, A. J.; Wyatt, P. B. Tetrahedron
1994, 50, 12755.
(8) For synthetic applications of achiral ꢀ-sulfonylamino imidates, see:
(a) Weinstein, D. S. Chem. Abstr. 2007, 146, 251831 (US 0049628). (b)
Litzinger, E. A.; Marta´sek, P.; Roman, L. J.; Silverman, R. B. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2006, 14, 3185. (c) Davies, S. G.; Haggitt, J. R.; Ichihara, O.; Kelly,
R. J.; Leech, M. A.; Price Mortimer, A. J.; Roberts, P. M.; Smith, A. D.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 2630. (d) Bailly, C.; Houssin, R.; Bernier,
J.-L.; Henichart, J.-P. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 5833. (e) Buschauer, A.;
Wegner, K.; Schunack, W. Arch. Pharm. 1983, 316, 515. (f) Dziuron, P.;
Schunack, W. Arch. Pharm. 1974, 307, 470.
(9) Ferreira, F.; Botuha, C.; Chemla, F.; Pe´rez-Luna, A. Chem. Soc. ReV.
2009, 38, 1162
.
(10) For reports on additions of metalloenamines from N-sulfinyl
ketimines across aldehydes, see :(a) Kochi, T.; Tang, T. P.; Ellman, J. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6518. (b) Kochi, T.; Tang, T. P.; Ellman,
J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11276. (c) Denolf, B.; Mangelinckx,
S.; To¨rnroos, K. W.; De Kimpe, N. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 187. (d) Patterson,
A. W.; Peltier, H. M.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4362.
(11) Schenkel, L. B.; Ellman, J. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3621.
(12) (a) Zhao, C.-H.; Liu, L.; Wang, D.; Chen, Y.-J. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 2977. (b) Lanter, J. C.; Chen, H. F.; Zhang, X. Q.; Sui, Z. H. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 5905.
(13) Kochi, T.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15652.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 9, 2010
1905