B. Dolensky, Chem. Commun., 2007, 3835–3837; E.-i. Kim,
S. Paliwal and C. S. Wilcox, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
11192–11193; M. J. Crossley, L. G. Mackay and A. C. Try,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 1925–1927; E. Weber,
U. Muller, D. Worsch, F. Vogtle, G. Will and A. Kirfel,
¨
¨
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1985, 1578–1580.
8 E. B. Veale, D. O. Frimannsson, M. Lawler and T. Gunnlaugsson,
Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 4040–4043; A. Tatibouet, M. Demeunynck,
¨
C. Andraud, A. Collet and J. Lhomme, Chem. Commun., 1999,
161–162.
9 C. S. Wilcox and M. D. Cowart, Tetrahedron Lett., 1986, 27,
5563–5566.
Scheme 2 Reaction conditions: (a) NaBH4 (3 equiv.), MeOH, 0 1C,
97%; (b) RLi (1.5 equiv.), THF, ꢀ78 1C, 2 h, 87–91% yield.
10 T. Weilandt, U. Kiehne, G. Schnakenburg and A. Lutzen, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 2320–2322; Y. M. Jeon, G. S. Armatas, D. Kim,
M. G. Kanatzidis and C. A. Mirkin, Small, 2009, 5, 46–50;
M. S. Khoshbin, M. V. Ovchinnikov, C. A. Mirkin, J. A. Golen
and A. L. Rheingold, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 2603–2609.
11 U. Kiehne, T. Bruhn, G. Schnakenburg, R. Frohlich,
alcohols 7a to 7d were isolated in excellent yield (87–91%) and
diastereoselectivity (dr > 49 : 1, 1H NMR). So far, all spectral
data indicate a classical Felkin–Anh trajectory for the
nucleophile approach.
In conclusion, this paper reports that a novel [1,2]-Stevens
G. Bringmann and A. Lutzen, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14,
4246–4255.
¨
like rearrangement of quaternary ammonium ions of Troger
¨
bases affords, in only two steps, functionalized configurationally
12 V. Prelog and P. Wieland, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1944, 27, 1127–1134.
13 D. A. Lenev, K. A. Lyssenko, D. G. Golovanov, V. Buss and
R. G. Kostyanovsky, Chem.–Eur. J., 2006, 12, 6412–6418.
stable ethano-bridged Troger derivatives that can themselves
¨
be easily transformed highly selectively. Efforts are currently
directed towards applications of these novel moieties and the
understanding of the underlying chemistry.
14 O. Trapp, G. Trapp, J. W. Kong, U. Hahn, F. Vogtle and
¨
V. Schurig, Chem.–Eur. J., 2002, 8, 3629–3634.
15 D. A. Lenev, D. G. Golovanov, K. A. Lyssenko and
R. G. Kostyanovsky, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2006, 17,
2191–2194.
16 Y. Hamada and S. Mukai, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1996, 7,
2671–2674.
We are grateful for financial support of this work from the
Swiss National Science Foundation and the State Secretariat
for Education and Science. We thank Mr Stephane Grass for
´
17 C. Michon, M. H. Goncalves-Farbos and J. Lacour, Chirality,
2009, 21, 809–817; L. Vial and J. Lacour, Org. Lett., 2002, 4,
3939–3942; J. Lacour, L. Vial and C. Herse, Org. Lett., 2002, 4,
1351–1354.
his technical expertise in many aspects of this project.
Notes and references
1 J. Troger, J. Prakt. Chem., 1887, 36, 225–245.
¨
18 J. A. Vanecko, H. Wan and F. G. West, Tetrahedron, 2006, 62,
1043–1062; I. E. Marko, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed.
´
2 S. Sergeyev, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2009, 92, 415–444; B. Dolensky,
J. Elguero, V. Kral, C. Pardo and M. Valik, Adv. Heterocycl.
Chem., 2007, 93, 1–56.
B. M. Trost and I. Fleming, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991,
pp. 913–974.
3 M. Demeunynck and A. Tatibouet, Prog. Heterocycl. Chem., 1999,
11, 1–20.
19 M.-H. Gonc
¸
alves-Farbos, L. Vial and J. Lacour, Chem. Commun.,
alves, P.-Y. Morgantini,
J. Weber, G. Bernardinelli and J. Lacour, Synlett, 2004,
2008, 829–831; L. Vial, M.-H. Gonc
¸
4 C. Pardo, I. Alkorta and J. Elguero, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
2006, 17, 191–198; V. Galasso, D. Jones and A. Modelli, Chem.
Phys., 2003, 288, 33–42; A. Aamouche, F. J. Devlin and
P. J. Stephens, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 2346–2354;
S. H. Wilen, J. Z. Qi and P. G. Williard, J. Org. Chem., 1991,
56, 485–487; T. R. Miller and E. C. Wagner, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1941, 63, 832–836; M. A. Spielman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1935, 57,
583–585.
1565–1568.
¨
20 M. Haring, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1963, 46, 2970–2982.
21 F. C. Cooper and M. W. Partridge, J. Chem. Soc., 1957,
2888–2893.
22 A variety of organic and inorganic bases were used. For details,
please consult the reagents used in conjunction with salt [3b][Br].
23 X. M. Zhang and F. G. Bordwell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116,
968–972.
5 H. Wu, X. M. Chen, Y. Wan, L. Ye, H. Q. Xin, H. H. Xu,
C. H. Yue, L. L. Pang, R. Ma and D. Q. Shi, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2009, 50, 1062–1065; E. Vardelle, A. Martin-Mingot,
M. P. Jouannetaud, J. C. Jacquesy and J. Marrot, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2009, 50, 1093–1096; A. B. Mahon, D. C. Craig and
A. C. Try, Synthesis, 2009, 636–642; M. Faroughi, K. X. Zhu,
P. Jensen, D. C. Craig and A. C. Try, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2009,
4266–4272; J. Artacho and K. Warnmark, Synthesis, 2009,
3120–3126; M. Havlik, V. Kral, R. Kaplanek and B. Dolensky,
Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 4767–4769; M. Faroughi, A. C. Try,
J. Klepetko and P. Turner, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48,
6548–6551; D. Didier and S. Sergeyev, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2007,
3905–3910; S. Satishkumar and M. Periasamy, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 2006, 17, 1116–1119; Y. Ishida, H. Ito, D. Mori and
K. Saigo, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 109–112; S. Sergeyev and
F. Diederich, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 1738–1740;
Y. Miyahara, K. Izumi, A. A. Ibrahim and T. Inazu, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1999, 40, 1705–1708.
24 Crystallographic data for rac-5b: (C25H24N2O); Mr = 368.5, tetra-
3
ꢀ
gonal, P421c, a = 23.9934(10), c = 6.8262(3) A, U = 3929.7(3) A ;
Z = 8, m = 0.076 mmꢀ1, dx = 1.246 g cmꢀ3, Mo-Ka radiation
(l = 0.71073 A); 22 803 reflections measured at 150 K on a STOE
IPDS diffractometer, 3854 unique reflections of which 2304 with
|Fo| > 2s(Fo). The structure was solved by direct methods
(SIR97). All calculations were performed with the XTAL system.
Full-matrix least-squares refinement based on F using weights of
1/(s2(Fo) + 0.0002(Fo2)) gave final values R = 0.034, wR = 0.023
(oRall = 0.034) and Sall = 1.05(2).
25 X. H. Bu, M. Du, L. J. Zhao, K. Tanaka, M. Shionoya and
M. Shiro, J. Chem. Res. (S), 2001, 2001, 243–245.
26 G. J. Cox, Preparative Enantioselective Chromatography, Blackwell
Pub., Ames, Iowa, 2005; E. R. Francotte, J. Chromatogr. A, 2001,
906, 379–397.
27 Retention times were 7.54 and 10.25 min for these two fractions
using an analytical Chiralcel OJ–H (0.46 ꢃ 25 cm) and a mixture of
n-heptane : ethanol 90 : 10 as eluent. Flow 1 ml minꢀ1. UV 210 nm.
The electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra of the separated
enantiomers are reported in the ESIw.
6 M. Harmata and M. Kahraman, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2000,
11, 2875–2879.
7 S. Satishkumar and M. Periasamy, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2009,
20, 2257–2262; M. Valik, J. Cejka, M. Havlik, V. Kral and
28 The reason for this surprising loss is still under evaluation.
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
2208 | Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 2206–2208