formation of TMM diyls obtainable from the substrates that possess
an alkynyl iodonium salt in the same molecule (Scheme 4).
Table 1. Angularly Fused Triquinanes from Iodonium Salt and
Malonate Anions
Scheme 4. From Linear Substrate to Angularly Fused Triquinane
4
X
R1
R2
R3
5
yield (%)
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
C(COOEt)2
C(COOEt)2
C(COOEt)2
C(OMe)2
C(S(CH2)3S)
O
H
Me
H
H
H
H
Me
H
H
H
H
H
5b
5c
5d
5e
5f
33
38
34
28
34
0
Me
Me
Me
Me
H
When the alkynyl iodonium salt prepared from the reaction of
dieneyne 7 with 8 was treated with phenylsulfinate anion or
thiophenoxide, the desired angularly fused triquinanes 9 were
obtained along with substituted alkynes 10. The formation of
alkynes 10 occurred through the rearrangement of the correspond-
ing alkylidene carbenes.12 If the formation of 10 was from the
corresponding alkylidene carbene, a carbon nucleophile would form
an alkylidene carbene that will not rearrange easily. When cyanide
anion that has not been reported as a nucleophile for alkynyl
iodonium salts13 was treated with the alkynyl iodonium salt in the
hope that the rearrangement of the corresponding alkylidene
carbene would not occur, result similar to that with the heteroatom
nucleophiles was observed as the reaction produced the angularly
fused triquinane product 9b as well as the alkyne product 10b.
In summary, we have demonstrated for the first time that
the angularly fused triquinanes can be synthesized through
TMM-mediated [2 + 3] cycloaddition reaction using tandem
cycloaddition reaction of alkylidene carbene generated from
alkynyl iodonium salts through TMM diyls. The new synthetic
methodology can readily be applied to the total synthesis of
various angularly fused triquinane natural products.2
4g
4h
H
Ph
H
H
5g
5h
O
0
bond formation between TMM diyl and the olefin is stabilized by
the phenyl group and this radical intermediate survives long enough
to react with either end of the allylic radical.9 The moderate yield
of the tandem cycloaddition reaction to angularly fused triquinane
seems to reflect the ring strain during the cycloaddition reaction.
Though the yields of angularly fused triquinanes appeared moder-
ate, the synthetic strategy is useful for the synthesis of natural
products as there were no other products in significant amount and
relatively good per step efficiency of the multistep reaction
sequence (70% per step).
Results in the Scheme 3 and Table 1 show that the tandem
cycloaddition reaction for the formation of angularly fused
triquinanes appeared to be quite general regardless of the
substitution pattern of the olefin (4c, 4d), whereas the cycload-
dition reaction to form linearly fused triquinanes was sensitive
to the substitution pattern as the cis-olefins and exo-olefins did
not undergo cycloaddition reaction.5a On the contrary, substrates
that contain relatively acidic protons (4g, 4h) did not produce
the desired products. This result might reflects the strain
associated with cyclization,10 since the substrates for the linear
triquinane formation produced the desired linearly fused
triquinanes, though the yields were low.5b
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by Basic
Science Research Program through the National Research
Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Educa-
tion, Science and Technology (KRF-2008-314-C00198).
Note Added after ASAP Publication. Scheme 3 was
incorrect in the version published ASAP May 10, 2010; the
correct version reposted May 12, 2010.
While the alkynyliodonium route to TMM diyls provides a
convergent pathway to triquinanes, only the propynyliodonium
salt can be used as the electrophile to form alkylidene carbenes
because of the facile rearrangement of the acetylenic iodonium
salt to an alkyne or C-H insertion reactions of the carbene
intermediates that would be derived from other substituted
alkynes.11 To expand the substrate scope, we next examined the
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic schemes
for the substrates, experimental details, and spectral data for
cyclization products. This material is available free of charge
OL100907T
(9) Siemionko, R. K.; Berson, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 3870–
3882.
(11) (a) Tykwinski, R. R.; Stang, P. J.; Persky, N. E. Tetrahedron Lett.
1994, 35, 23–26. (b) Ochiai, M.; Kunishima, M.; Nagao, Y.; Fuji, K.; Shiro,
M.; Fujita, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 8281–8283.
(12) (a) Ochiai, M.; Kunishima, M.; Tani, S.; Nagao, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 3135–3142. (b) Zhdankin, V. V.; Stang, P. J. Tetrahedron
1998, 54, 10927–10966.
(10) Examples of reactivity differences due to different substitution
patterns of the olefin in the cyclopropanation reaction: (a) Mori, K.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 838. (b) Uchida, T.; Katsuki, T. Synthesis
2006, 1715. Different cycloaddition mode of Pauson-Khand reaction to
form angularly fused triquinanes: (c) Knudsen, M. J.; Schore, N. E. J. Org.
Chem. 1984, 49, 5025. (d) Ishizaki, M.; Iwahara, K.; Niimi, Y.; Satoh, H.;
Hoshino, O. Tetrahedron 2001, 51, 2729.
(13) Ochiai, M.; Kunishima, M.; Fuji, K.; Nagao, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1988,
53, 6144–6145.
2674
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 11, 2010