C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
withdrawing carboxylate group was installed to the alkyne terminus.
Expectedly, the gold catalysis proceeded much slower, and mild
heating was required to complete the reaction within 24 h;
moreover, the combination of 4-acetylpyridine N-oxide and
IPrAuNTf2 worked better. As shown in Table 3, high to excellent
yields were observed with various substrates. For asymmetric
substrates, low diastereoselectivities were observed (entries 2
and 3).
With chiral propargylic alcohols readily available,11 this chemistry
provides easy access to chiral oxetan-3-ones. For example, enantio-
merically enriched alcohol 5b11c (80% ee) was converted into oxetan-
3-one 6b (81% ee) with no apparent racemization detected.
Scheme 2. A One-Step Synthesis of Oxetan-3-Ones and Its
Synthetic Conversion without Purification
Table 2. Reaction Scope with Secondary Propargyl Alcoholsa
In conclusion, we have developed a general solution for the synthesis
of various oxetan-3-ones. This reaction uses readily available prop-
argylic alcohols as substrates and proceeds without the exclusion of
moisture or air (“open flask”). Notably, oxetan-3-one, a highly valuable
substrate for drug discovery, can be prepared in one step from propargyl
alcohol in a fairly good yield. The facile formation of the strained
oxetane ring provides strong support for the intermediacy of R-oxo
gold carbenes. This efficient generation of gold carbenes via intermo-
lecular alkyne oxidation would potentially offer a general entry into
R-oxo metal carbene chemistry without using hazardous diazo ketones.
a [5] ) 0.05 M. b Isolated yields. c 2-Bromopyridine N-oxide and
MsOH were used instead. d Temperature: -20 °C; time: 16 h.
Table 3. Reaction Scope With Tertiary Propargyl Alcoholsa
Acknowledgment. We thank NSF (CAREER award CHE-
0969157), NIGMS (R01 GM084254), and UCSB for generous
financial support.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
compound characterization data. This material is available free of charge
References
(1) For a review, see: Dejaegher, Y.; Kuz’menok, N. M.; Zvonok, A. M.; De
Kimpe, N. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 29–60.
(2) For examples, see: (a) Pons, M.; Simons, S. S., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1981,
46, 3262–3264. (b) Rowland, A. T.; Bennett, P. J.; Shoupe, T. S. J. Org.
Chem. 1968, 33, 2426–2436.
(3) Kitagawa, M.; Hasegawa, S.; Saito, S.; Shimada, N.; Takita, T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1991, 32, 3531–3534.
(4) (a) Kozikowski, A. P.; Fauq, A. H. Synlett 1991, 1991, 783–784. (b)
Hamzik, P. J.; Brubaker, J. D. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1116–1119.
(5) (a) Wuitschik, G.; Rogers-Evans, M.; Mu¨ller, K.; Fischer, H.; Wagner, B.;
Schuler, F.; Polonchuk, L.; Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 7736–7739. (b) Wuitschik, G.; Rogers-Evans, M.; Buckl, A.;
Bernasconi, M.; Ma¨rki, M.; Godel, T.; Fischer, H.; Wagner, B.; Parrilla,
I.; Schuler, F.; Schneider, J.; Alker, A.; Schweizer, W. B.; Mu¨ller, K.;
Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4512–4515. (c) Burkhard,
J. A.; Gue´rot, C.; Knust, H.; Rogers-Evans, M.; Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett.
2010, 12, 1944–1947.
(6) For selected examples, see: (a) Marshall, J. R.; Walker, J. J. Chem. Soc. 1952,
467. (b) Thijs, L.; Cillissen, P. J. M.; Zwanenburg, B. Tetrahedron 1992, 48,
9985–9990. (c) Padwa, A.; Sa, M. M. Quim. NoVa 1999, 22, 815.
(7) Ye, L.; Cui, L.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3258–
3259.
(8) For monographs regarding metal carbene chemistry, see: (a) Do¨rwald, F. Z.
Metal Carbenes in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany,
1999. (b) Barluenga, J.; Rodr´ıguez, F.; Fan˜ana`s, F. J.; Flo`rez, J. In Metal
Carbenes in Organic Synthesis; Do¨tz, K. H., Ed.; Topics in Organometallic
Chemistry, Vol. 13; Springer: Berlin, 2004; pp 59-122. (c) Doyle, M. P.;
McKervey, M. A.; Ye, T. Modern Catalytic Methods for Organic Synthesis
with Diazo Compounds: From Cyclopropanes to Ylides; Wiley: New York, 1998.
(9) $220/g from Synthonix.
(10) Mai, K.; Patil, G. Synth. Commun. 1985, 15, 157–163.
(11) For selective reviews, see: (a) Trost, B. M.; Weiss, A. H. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2009, 351, 963–983. (b) Pu, L. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 9873–9886. (c)
Frantz, D. E.; Fa¨ssler, R.; Tomooka, C. S.; Carreira, E. M. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2000, 33, 373–381.
a [7] ) 0.1 M. b Isolated yields. c Reaction temperature: 60 °C.
d Reaction temperature: 40 °C.
The synthetic utility of this chemistry is underscored by a one-
step preparation of oxetan-3-one. As discussed above, the synthesis
of this highly useful O-heterocycle4,5 requires multiple steps and
is low yielding. It is commercially available but expensive.9 To
our delight, this volatile heterocycle was formed in 71% NMR yield
directly from cheap propargyl alcohol following this chemistry, and
the catalyst loading could be lowered to 1 mol % with little effect
to the yield (Scheme 2); moreover, a 51% NMR yield was
achievable with cheaper and lesser amounts of reagents and a higher
substrate concentration. Coupled with a subsequent Wittig reaction5a
upon simple workup or a Strecker reaction10 directly, this reaction
led to oxetane derivatives 9 and 10 in 62% and 60% overall yields,
respectively [5 mol % of (2-biphenyl)Cy2PAuNTf2 used].
JA1033952
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 25, 2010 8551