Prefecture. On the basis of extensive spectroscopic investiga-
tions, chemical degradation, and derivatization studies, planar
structure 1, depicted in Figure 1, was assigned as bisebro-
moamide. In addition to the amino acid L-alanine, bisebro-
moamide contains a significant number of D-amino acids and
N-methylated amino acids along with several other modified
amino acid residues that include D-leucine, N-methyl-3-
bromotyrosine, modified 4-methylproline, a 2-substituted
thiazoline-4-methyl-4-carboxylic acid unit, N-methylphenyl-
alanine, and a rare 2-(1-oxopropyl)pyrrolidine moiety which
has not been previously reported in any natural product.
Furthermore, and to the best of our knowledge, there is no
report on the total synthesis of bisebromoamide.
according to the procedure of Boger8 from D-tyrosine. Ortho-
selective monobromination of 6 was effected with N-
bromosuccinimide and p-toluenesulfonic acid in acetonitrile9
to afford 7 in 87% yield. Coupling of 7 with Boc-L-Ala-OH
was achieved through carboxyl activation with 3-(diethoxy-
phosphoryloxy)-1,2,3-benzotriazin-4(3H)-one (DEPBT)10 and
provided dipeptide 8 in 77% yield. Saponification of the
methyl ester of 8 gave the corresponding acid 2 in 95% yield.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Dipeptide 2
The synthesis of fragment 5 commenced with the con-
densation of the known N-methyl L-phenylalanine methyl
ester 911 with Boc-D-leucine (Scheme 2). Bis(2-oxo-3-
oxazolidinyl)phosphinic chloride (BOP-Cl)12 was employed
to effect the condensation process, and dipeptide 10 was
obtained in 86% yield. Amino ethyl ketone 11 was easily
prepared by addition of ethylmagnesium bromide to the Boc-
protected proline-derived Weinreb amide according to pub-
lished procedures.13 Hydrolysis of the methyl ester of 10
followed by a DEPBT-mediated condensation with amine
11 afforded the corresponding tripeptide. Next, cleavage of
the Boc group with trifluoroacetic acid provided fragment 5
as the corresponding ammonium trifluoroacetate salt in 74%
yield (over three steps).
At this juncture, the time had arrived to explore a suitable
strategy for the assembly of fragments and installation of the
sensitive thiazoline heterocycle. In the initial phases of our study,
Cbz-protected 2-methylserine (15) and dipeptide 10 were
employed to examine the feasibility and efficiency of the
important thiazoline-forming reaction from the corresponding
Figure 1. Retrosynthetic analysis of 1.
The principal synthetic challenge associated with the
preparation of bisebromoamide is the efficient formation and
assembly of the sensitive thiazoline heterocycle.4 From the
retrosynthetic perspective, we envisioned that the thiazoline-
ring moiety could arise from either 2-methylserine or
2-methylcysteine derivatives and be installed at a late stage
in the synthesis. Bearing this in mind, we anticipated that 1
might be conveniently constructed by the assembly of four
fragments: dipeptide 2, N-Boc-4-methylproline methyl ester
3, 2-methylserine 4a (or 2-methylcysteine 4b), and tripeptidyl
ketone 5.
While subunits N-Boc-4-methylproline methyl ester 35 and
2-methylserine 4a6 (or 2-methylcysteine 4b7) could be fully
synthesized according to literature procedures, peptide-based
fragments 2 and 5 were unknown and had to be elaborated
from amino acids as shown in Schemes 1 and 2. The
synthesis of fragment 2 (Scheme 1) began with the known
N-methyl D-tyrosine methyl ester 6, which was prepared
(8) Boger, D. L.; Yohannes, D. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 487–499.
(9) Bovonsombat, P.; Khanthapura, P.; Krause, M. M.; Leykajarakul,
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 7008–7011.
(10) (a) Li, H.; Jiang, X.; Ye, Y.; Fan, C.; Romoff, T.; Goodman, M.
Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 91–93. (b) Fan, C.-X.; Hao, X.-L.; Ye, Y.-H. Synth.
Commun. 1996, 26, 1455–1457.
(11) (a) Van der Auwera, C.; Anteunis, M. J. O. Int. J. Pept. Protein
Res. 1987, 29, 574–88. (b) Adima, A.; Bied, C.; Moreau, J. J. E.; Wong,
M. C. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 2582, 2588. (c) Park, J. D.; Lee, K. J.;
Kim, D. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 237–243.
(4) (a) Wipf, P.; Fritch, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5397–5400. (b)
Boden, C. D. J.; Pattenden, G.; Ye, T. Synlett 1995, 417–419.
(5) Murphy, A. C.; Mitova, M. I.; Blunt, J. W.; Munro, M. H. G. J.
Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 806–809.
(12) (a) Diago-Meseguer, J.; Palomo-Coll, A. L. Synthesis 1980, 547–
551. (b) Cabre, J.; Palomo, A. L. Synthesis 1984, 5, 413–417. (c) Tung,
R. D.; Rich, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 4342–4343.
(13) De Luca, L.; Giacomelli, G.; Taddei, M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
2534–2537.
(6) Seebach, D.; Aebi, J. D.; Gander-Coquoz, M.; Naef, R. HelV. Chim.
Acta 1987, 70, 1194–1216.
(7) Pattenden, G.; Thom, S. M.; Jones, M. F. Tetrahedron 1993, 49,
2131–2138.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 13, 2010
3019