In summary, charge stabilization in the donor–acceptor1–
acceptor2 type molecular triad composed of closely spaced
ferrocene–boron dipyrrin-fullerene, but not in triphenylamine-
boron dipyrrin–fullerene is reported. Excitation of the central
boron dipyrrin of 1 results in abstraction of an electron from
the ferrocene entity to produce boron dipyrrin anion radical
which subsequently undergoes electron shift to produce
fullerene anion radical. As a result of relatively distant positioning
of the cation and anion radicals charge stabilization is
accomplished in the ferrocene–boron dipyrrin–fullerene triad
in spite of closely disposed donor and acceptor entities.
We are thankful to N. K. Subbaiyan for help in recording DPV
experiments. This work was financially supported by the National
Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 0804015 and EPS-0903806)
and matching support from the State of Kansas through
Kansas Technology Enterprise Corporation, Grant-in-Aid (No.
20108010), and the Global COE (center of excellence) program
‘‘Global Education and Research Center for Bio-Environmental
Chemistry’’ of Osaka University from Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
Fig. 5 Femtosecond (left) and nanosecond (right) transient absorption
spectra of TPA–BDP in deaerated PhCN.
electron from the ferrocene entity to produce boron dipyrrin
anion radical which subsequently undergoes electron shift to
produce fullerene anion radical. As
a
result of
relatively distant positioning of the cation and anion radicals
charge stabilization is accomplished in the ferrocene–boron
dipyrrin–fullerene triad in spite of closely disposed donor and
acceptor entities.
The femtosecond measurements of the dyad, 2a by using
460 nm light in PhCN showed absorption bands at 590 and
690 nm corresponding to the boron dipyrrin radical anion and
TPA radical cation, respectively (Fig. 5).11 This observation
suggests the electron transfer from the TPA to the attached
Notes and references
1 (a) M. R. Wasielewski, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 1910; (b) D. Gust
and T. A. Moore, in The Porphyrin Handbook, ed. K. M. Kadish,
K. M. Smith and R. Guilard, Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2000,
vol. 8, pp. 153–190; (c) M. E. El-Khouly, O. Ito, P. M. Smith and
F. D’Souza, J. Photochem. Photobiol., C, 2004, 5, 79; (d) F. D’Souza
and O. Ito, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2005, 249, 1410.
2 (a) R. Chitta and F. D’Souza, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 1440;
(b) S. Fukuzumi and T. Kojima, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 1427;
(c) S. Fukuzumi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2008, 10, 2283;
(d) F. D’Souza and O. Ito, Chem. Commun., 2009, 4913;
(e) V. Sgobba and D. M. Guldi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 165.
3 (a) H. Imahori, T. Umeyama and S. Ito, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42,
1809; (b) P. V. Kamat, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 2834;
(c) B. E. Hardin, E. T. Hoke, P. B. Armstrong, J.-H. Yum,
P. Comte, T. Torres, J. M. J. Frechet, M. K. Nazeeruddin,
+
BDP formingÀ TPAꢁ –BDPꢁÀ. Interestingly, the kCR of
TPAꢁ –BDPꢁ was found to be 6.1 Â 108 sÀ1, from which
+
t
RIP was evaluated as 1.6 ns. The complementary nanosecond
transient measurements with 510 nm laser excitation revealed
absorption bands at 430 and 600 nm, in addition to the
bleaching at 510 nm. These long-lived absorption bands are
attributed to the triplet state of BDP. Because the formation of
the triplet BDP is not efficient in the case of the reference 1b,
the formation of triplet BDP may occur via CR of the radical-
ion-pair of 2a by taking into account the energy level of
+
À
3TPA*–BDP (1.58 eV) is lower than that of TPAꢁ –BDPꢁ
M. Gratzel and M. D. McGehee, Nat. Photonics, 2009, 3, 667;
¨
(2.00 eV) (see Fig. S6 in ESIw).
Photoirradiation of the triad 2 in a deaerated PhCN
(d) T. M. Figueira-Duarte, A. Gegout and J.-F. Nierengarten,
Chem. Commun., 2007, 109.
À
ꢁ
4 (a) A. Loudet and K. Burgess, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 4891;
(b) F. D’Souza, P. M. Smith, M. E. Zandler, A. L. McCarty,
M. Itou, Y. Araki and O. Ito, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 7898.
5 (a) H. Imahori, H. Norieda, H. Yamada, N. Nishimura,
I. Yamazaki, Y. Sakata and S. Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2001, 123, 100; (b) E. Maligaspe, N. V. Tkachenko,
N. K. Subbaiyan, R. Chitta, M. E. Zandler, H. Lemmetyinen
and F. D’Souza, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2009, 113, 8478.
solution revealed the characteristic absorption band of C60
in the NIR region with a maximum at 1000 nm (see Fig. S7 in
+
ESIw).2,13 The absorption band of TPAꢁ waÀs not observed,
ꢁ
suggesting that the formation of the C60
results from
electron transfer from the singlet excited BDP, as electron
donor, to the C60. Such electron transfer is exothermic
(ÀDGCR = 1.77 eV and ÀDGCS = 0.45 eV). The kCR value
6 (a) S. Hattori, K. Ohkubo, Y. Urano, H. Sunahara, T. Nagano,
Y. Wada, N. V. Tkachenko, H. Lemmetyinen and S. Fukuzumi,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 15368; (b) R. Ziessel, P. Retailleau,
K. J. Elliott and A. Harriman, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 10369.
7 C. Tahtaoui, C. Thomas, F. Rohmer, P. Klotz, G. Duportail,
Y. Mely, D. Bonnet and M. Hibert, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 269.
8 M. Maggini, G. Scorrano and M. Prato, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993,
115, 9798.
of the TPA–BDPꢁ+–C60 À was determined to be 2.0 Â 109 sÀ1
,
ꢁ
from which the tRIP was evaluated as 500 ps. The finding that
the tRIP of triad 2 is shorter than that of dyad 2a suggests the
absence of the electron-shift and/or hole-migration processes
between the TPA, BDP and C60 entities of 2, by taking intÀo
consideration the energy level of TPA–BDPꢁ+–C60
(1.77 eV) is comparable to that of TPAꢁ+–BDP–C60
ꢁ
ꢁ
9 Gaussian 03, Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
À
10 ÀDGCR = e(Eox – Ered) + DGS; ÀDGCS = DE00 À (ÀDGCR),
where DE00 and DGS are the energy of 1BDP* and static energy,
respectively.
11 Electronic Absorption Spectra of Radical Ions, ed. T. Shida,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.
12 T. M. Figueira-Duarte, Y. Rio, A. Listorti, B. Delavaux-Nicot,
M. Holler, F. Marchioni, P. Ceroni, N. Armaroli and
J. F. Nierengarten, New J. Chem., 2008, 32, 54.
13 Y. Araki, Y. Ysumura and O. Ito, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 9843.
14 C. S. Foote, in Physics and Chemistry of the Fullerenes, ed. K.
Prassides, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, 1994, p. 79.
(1.64 eV) (see Fig. S8 in ESIw). At longer time scale (1800 ps),
the spectrum revealed the characteristic absorption of the
triplet C60 suggesting that the radical-ion pair decays through
CR to populate the triplet C60. This was also the conclusion
based on nanosecond transient absorption measurements
(see Fig. S9 in ESIw). The spectra in this time scale lacked
bands of the radical ion-pairs instead an absorption band at
3
700 nm corresponding to the C60* was observed.14
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3301–3303 | 3303