C. Sowrirajan et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 222 (2016) 398–406
405
1.18 × 103 mol−1 dm3. The association constant value is smaller than
that for the binding of free MPIMC with BSA (in water). Hence cyclodex-
trin complexation decreases the strength of binding of the MPIMC mol-
ecule with BSA, due to the reason that MPIMC is covered up by β-CD
from the approach of BSA molecule for binding. This observation leads
to the idea that cyclodextrin encapsulation can help the transport of
drugs in blood stream by binding with the BSA and the bound drug is
more readily released than the free drug stronger bound with BSA.
Fig. 11 shows the overlap of the fluorescence spectrum of BSA with
the absorption spectrum of MPIMC-β-CD complex. The calculated values
of n, Φ, J, E, R0, and r0 are 1.33, 0.15, 2.01 × 10−21 M−1 cm−1 nm4, 0.010,
2.875 nm and 6.115 nm, respectively with the method discussed earlier
in the case of MPIMC–BSA binding. These values are different from the
values obtained for MPIMC binding with BSA in water. Hence cyclodex-
trin clearly modulates the binding.
Further insight into the mode of MPIMC–BSA binding was offered by
molecular modeling. BSA consists the major domains I, II, and III with
the residues 1–183 in domain I, 184–376 in domain II, and 377–583 in
domain III. The hydrophobic cavity in sub-domain IIA can allow the
drug molecule to get accommodated, which plays a vital role in the
transportation of drugs in BSA. The best energy ranked results (Fig.
12) reveal that MPIMC is located within the sub-domain III hydrophobic
cavity in close proximity to the residues, such as Leu-505, Ala-527, Leu-
543, and Thr-545 suggesting that there occurs a hydrophobic contribu-
tion to the binding. Moreover, hydrogen bonding is revealed at these
sites. Hence, this finding explains the effective quenching of fluores-
cence of BSA by MPIMC. Furthermore, there are many of hydrophobic
interactions; many several apolar residues close to the ligand aid in sta-
bilizing the molecule via phobic interactions. The hydrogen bonds in-
crease the stability of the MPIMC–BSA bound system. Therefore, the
interaction between the MPIMC and BSA is dominated both by hydro-
phobic binding and hydrogen bonds. Since β-CD blocks some of the pos-
sible hydrogen bond formation between MPIMC and BSA, the binding
strength of MPIMC–β-CD with BSA is relatively low compared to that
of MPIMC in water.
Fig. 11. The spectral overlap of the absorption spectrum of MPIMC-β-CD (A) and the
fluorescence emission spectrum of BSA (F).
acceptor, and J(λ) is the overlap integral of the absorption spectrum of
the acceptor and the fluorescence spectrum of the donor. J(λ), the over-
lap integral is given by
Z
∞
FDðλÞεAðλ0Þλ4dλ
0
Z
J ¼
ð10Þ
∞
FDðλÞdλ
0
In the above equation FD(λ) refers to the corrected fluorescence in-
tensity of the donor between the wavelengths λ and (λ + Δλ), and εA
(λ) is the molar extinction coefficient of the acceptor at the wavelength
λ. Random orientations of the donor and the acceptor are assumed. The
results obtained are n = 1.33, J = 7.39 × 10−21 M−1 cm−1 nm4, E =
0.029, R0 = 2.433 nm, and r0 = 4.354 nm. The donor–to–acceptor dis-
tance (4.354 nm) confirms that static quenching occurs with the energy
transfer from BSA to MPIMC.
According to the literature, there is almost no influence of β-CD on
BSA [37]. The absorption spectrum of MPIMC–β-CD complex with vari-
ous amounts of BSA is shown in Fig. 10 (a). The blue shift of absorbance
is less compared to the shift in water. This is due to the protonated en-
vironment offered by β-CD to MPIMC from BSA. However, the absor-
bance increases, which indicate that binding with BSA occurs. Fig. 10
(b) shows the quenching of tryptophan fluorescence of BSA due to bind-
ing with MPIMC. There is an isosbestic point due to the equilibrium be-
tween MPIMC–β-CD and its complex with BSA. The quenching
magnitude in the presence of β-CD is lesser compared to that in
water. The Stern–Volmer quenching plot for the above mentioned inter-
action is shown in Fig. 10 (c). The calculated Stern–Volmer constant is
9.94 × 103 mol−1 dm3. This is lesser when compared the case of binding
of MPIMC with BSA in water. The plot of log (1/[Dt] – (F0-F)[Pt]/F0) vs.
log (F0-F)/F for the binding of MPIMC-β-CD with BSA following Eq. (5)
is shown in Fig. 10 (d). The association constant is determined as
4. Conclusions
MPIMC forms 1:2 inclusion complex with β-CD and the association
constant is determined as 4.14 × 104 mol−2 dm6. This is evidenced by
fluorescence spectroscopy and 2D ROESY correlation spectroscopy.
The decrease of pKa for the equilibrium of MPIMC in the presence of
β-CD than in water, revealing the restriction to protonation offered by
the β-CD. Study of the binding of MPIMC with BSA is carried out in the
absence and the presence of β-CD. The calculated KSV for the quenching
of fluorescence of BSA by MPIMC is 1.18 × 104 mol−1 dm3. The associa-
tion constant is calculated as 1.37 × 104 mol−1 dm3 and the stoichiom-
etry is 1. In the presence of β-CD the association constant is determined
as 1.18 × 103 mol−1 dm3. Förster resonance energy transfer between
BSA and MPIMC is studied in the absence and the presence of β-CD.
The donor–to–acceptor distance confirms that static quenching occurs
with the energy transfer from BSA to MPIMC. This distance is smaller
in the case of free MPIMC than the β-CD-complexed form of MPIMC
binding with BSA. Hence the encapsulation by cyclodextrin decreases
the strength of binding of the MPIMC molecule with BSA. Molecular
modeling reveals that the binding of MPIMC through the hydrophobic
and the hydrogen bonding sites of BSA. The hydrogen bonds increase
the stability of the MPIMC–BSA bound system. Since β-CD blocks
some of the possible hydrogen bonding sites between MPIMC and
BSA, the binding strength of MPIMC–β-CD complex with BSA is relative-
ly low with that of free MPIMC.
The Supplementary Material contains the 1H and 13C NMR spec-
trum for the synthesized MPIMC. Supplementary data associated with
Fig. 12. Molecular docking poses of MPIMC with BSA.