Scientific Research (C) (No. 18590013 and No. 21590018) and
a Grant-in-Aid for High Technology Research Program from
the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology of Japan (MEXT).
Notes and references
1 For a review on influenza virus infections, see: G. Neumann,
T. Noda and Y. Kawaoka, Nature, 2009, 459, 931–939.
2 (a) T. Kamigauchi, T. Fujiwara, H. Tani, Y. Kawamura and
I. Horibe, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Japan, PCT WO 9711947 A1,
April 3, 1997; (b) K. Minagawa, S. Kouzuki, J. Yoshimoto,
Y. Kawamura, H. Tani, T. Iwata, Y. Terui, H. Nakai, S. Yagi,
N. Hattori, T. Fujiwara and T. Kamigauchi, J. Antibiot., 2002, 55,
155–164; (c) K. Minagawa, S. Kouzuki and T. Kamigauchi,
J. Antibiot., 2002, 55, 165–171.
3 It has been reported that the anti-influenza A virus activity of 1 is
1760 times more than that of amantadine (IC50 = 5.3 mM) and 250
times more than that of zanamivir (IC50 = 0.75 mM), see ref. 2b.
4 The in vivo anti-influenza virus activity of 1 has been also reported;
see: (a) J. Yoshimoto, S. Yagi, J. Ono, K. Sugita, N. Hattori,
T. Fujioka, T. Fujiwara, H. Sugimoto and N. Hashimoto,
J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 2000, 52, 1247–1255; (b) S. Yagi, J. Ono,
J. Yoshimoto, K. Sugita, N. Hattori, T. Fujioka, T. Fujiwara,
H. Sugimoto, K. Hirano and N. Hashimoto, Pharm. Res., 1999,
16, 1041–1046.
5 (a) J. Yoshimoto, M. Kakui, H. Iwasaki, H. Sugimoto,
T. Fujiwara and N. Hattori, Microbiol. Immunol., 2000, 44,
677–685; (b) J. Yoshimoto, M. Kakui, H. Iwasaki, T. Fujiwara,
H. Sugimoto and N. Hattori, Arch. Virol., 1999, 144, 865–878.
6 For a recent review on the strategies for discovery of anti-influenza
virus agents, see: H.-P. Hsieh and J. T.-A. Hsu, Curr. Pharm. Des.,
2007, 13, 3531–3542.
7 It has been reported that the anti-influenza A virus activity of
racemic (ꢁ)-1 is about half of that of natural (+)-1 (see ref. 8),
implying that unnatural (–)-1 shows no potent anti-influenza A
virus activity.
8 T. Taishi, S. Takechi and S. Mori, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39,
4347–4350.
9 M. Nakatani, M. Nakamura, A. Suzuki, M. Inoue and T. Katoh,
Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 4483–4486.
10 T. Oguchi, K. Watanabe, K. Ohkubo, H. Abe and T. Katoh,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 2826–2845.
Scheme 4 Synthesis of (+)-stachyflin (1) through the key BF3ꢀEt2O-
induced domino epoxide-opening/rearrangement/cyclization reaction
of 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) BF3ꢀEt2O, CH2Cl2, ꢃ40 1C to rt,
66% for 19a, 9% for 19b; (b) Dess–Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2, rt,
94%; (c) LiAlH(t-BuO)3, THF, ꢃ20 1C, 96%; (d) PIFA, CH2Cl2, rt,
54%; (e) n-BuSLi, HMPA, 110 1C, 80%. PIFA = [bis(trifluoro-
acetoxy)iodo]benzene, HMPA = hexamethylphosphorous triamide.
11 Protection of the lactam amide was indispensable due to the low
solubility of 9 in organic solvents.
12 After screening several protecting groups, the 3,4DMB group was
found to be suitable for a later deprotection step (see 19b - 21 in
Scheme 4).
13 This type of reductive alkylation has been successfully utilized as a
crucial step in our total synthesis of marine sesquiterpene quinones
and hydroquinones; see: J. Sakurai, T. Oguchi, K. Watanabe,
H. Abe, S. Kanno, M. Ishikawa and T. Katoh, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2008, 14, 829–837.
(54% yield) followed by cleavage of the O-methyl moiety in
the resulting lactam 21 (80% yield).
In conclusion, we accomplished the enantioselective
total synthesis of (+)-stachyflin (1) in a highly efficient and
convergent manner. The key transformation involved a novel
acid-induced domino epoxide-opening/rearrangement/cyclization
reaction (2 - [I - II - III] - 19a,b). Importantly, the
synthesis has the potential for producing stachyflin analogues
for the development of novel anti-influenza virus agents.
We are grateful to Dr Kazuyuki Minagawa, Shionogi &
Co., Ltd., for providing us with natural (+)-stachyflin. We
also thank Professor Masayuki Inoue, the University of
Tokyo, for useful discussion and suggestion. This work was
supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority
Area (No. 17035073 and No. 18032065), a Grant-in-Aid for
14 In our preliminary model studies (see ref. 9), BF3ꢀEt2O gave the
best result among several Lewis and Brønsted acids examined.
Detailed results and discussion will be reported in a full account.
15 For a recent review on cationic domino reactions, see: L. F. Tietze,
G. Brasche and K. M. Gericke, in Domino Reactions in Organic
Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006, pp. 11–42.
16 The optical rotation was [a]2D4+133.3 (c 0.46 in MeOH), and that
ofnatural 1 was [a]2D4 + 138.7 (c 1.00 in MeOH). The spectroscopic
properties (IR, 1H and 13C NMR, and HRMS) of synthetic sample
1 were identical to those of the natural product, which was kindly
provided by Dr Kazuyuki Minagawa, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (see
ESIw).
17 The use of standard reagents such as ammonium cerium(IV) nitrate
(CAN) and 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ)
resulted in failure. In the case of CAN, decomposition products were
generated, while as per DDQ the starting material was recovered.
ꢂc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 4055–4057 | 4057