Table 2 One pot transformation of cellulose into alkyl glycoside surfactantsa
Yield (mol%)c
Alkyl-a,b- glucoside Alkyl-a,b-xyloside Total yield of
Entry Alcohol
Conversion (%)b
Butanold 96
Cellobiose Glucose Xylose HMF (Yield wt%)
(Yield wt%)
surfactant (wt%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
5.8
7.1
4.8
4.4
Traces
0.7
0.6
0.5
1.5
1.0
0.8
0.2
0.8
16.4
18.7
9.7
8.1
3.4
3.4
3.1
3.0
4.4
17.4
3.2
1.8
1.1
6.9
6.9
2.7
2.7
3.2
3.2
2.3
2.1
2.8
4.3
2.8
0
3.8
5.3
5.2
3.8
15.1
8.0
7.4
6.1
4.8
10.1
5.8
1.6
4.1
5.0 (7.2)
5.8 (9.4)
Traces
7.2
Hexanold 96
1.2 (1.7)
4.8 (6.9)
5.4 (8.7)
2.8 (4.5)
4.1 (6.7)
5.4 (8.8)
7.3 (11.7)
6.6 (10.7)
4.7 (7.6)
8.5 (12.3)
0
11.1
34.7
40.0
48.3
63.8
70.0
81.7
60.7
52.8
72.4
71.5
74.9
Hexanole 95
Octanole 95
17.1 (27.8)
17.3 (31.3)
24.3 (43.8)
31.7 (57.1)
33.9 (61.2)
38.8 (70.0)
27.7 (50.0)
25.1 (45.2)
36.9 (60.1)
39.7 (71.5)
35.5 (64.0)
Octanolf
98
Octanolg 96
Octanolh 94
Octanoli
Octanolj
98
96
9
10
11
12
13
Octanolk 98
Hexanoli 95
Octanoll
99
Octanolm 95
1.1
6.7 (10.9)
a
a-Cellulose (300 mg, 1.85 mmol unity of glucose), A15 (160 mg, 0.74 mmol H+), ionic liquid (6 g), water (315 ml), at 373 K. Then for the
hydrolysis, the alcohol (43 mmol) was added to the solution and the temperature was decreased to 363 K. The reaction was carried out at 40 mbar
b
c
d
for 24 h. Calculated by the weight difference of cellulose before and after reaction. Determined by HPLC. A15 (80 mg, 0.37 mmol H+),
hydrolysis time: 5 h and Fischer glycosidation carried out at atmospheric pressure. A15 (80 mg, 0.37 mmol H+). Hydrolysis time: 5 h.
e
f
g
h
Hydrolysis time: 2.5 h. Hydrolysis time: 2 h. Hydrolysis time: 1.5 h. Hydrolysis time: 1 h. Fischer glycosidation carried out at atmospheric
i
j
k
l
pressure. Cellulose fibres (600 mg, 3.70 mmol unity of glucose, 67% crystallinity), water (760 ml), A15 (350 mg, 1.64 mmol H+), hydrolysis time:
40 min. H3PW12O40 (710 mg, 0.74 mmol H+), hydrolysis time: 1 h.
m
the H3O+ species was progressively released in the ionic liquid
phase. The regenerated resin allows the production of octyl-
a,b-glycoside with a mass yield of 77.8%.
9 (a) D. Klemm, B. Heublein, H.-P. Fink and A. Bohn, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 3358; (b) C. Luo, S. Wamg and H. Liu,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 7636; (c) N. Ji, T. Zhang,
M. Zheng, A. Wang, H. Wang, X. Wang and J. G. Chen, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8510.
10 P. Zugenmaier, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2001, 26, 1341.
11 (a) W. S. Mok, M. J. Antal Jr. and G. Varhegyi, Ind. Eng. Chem.
´
Res., 1992, 31, 94; (b) F. Camacho, P. Gonzalez-Tello, E. Jurado
and A. Robles, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 1996, 67, 350.
12 A. V. Gusakov, T. N. Salanovich, A. I. Antonov, B. B. Ustinov,
O. N. Okunev, R. Bourlingame, M. Emalfard, M. Baez and
A. P. Sinitsyn, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2007, 97, 1028.
13 (a) M. Sasaki, Z. Fang, Y. Fukushima, T. Adschiri and K. Arai,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2000, 39, 2883; (b) Y. Zhao, W.-J. Lu,
H.-T. Wang and D. Li, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43, 1565.
14 (a) S. Suganuma, K. Nakajima, M. Kitano, D. Yamaguchi,
H. Kato, S. Hayashi and M. Hara, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
130, 12787; (b) D. Yamaguchi, M. Kitano, S. Suganuma,
K. Nakajima, H. Kato and M. Hara, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009,
113, 3181.
In conclusion, we have shown that by working in ionic
liquid media, with a sulfonic resin as catalyst it is possible to
transform cellulose into alkyl glucoside surfactants in a one
pot reaction with a mass yield of 82%. This could be achieved
by properly coupling the hydrolysis of cellulose with the
Fischer glycosidation reaction of the monosaccharide formed
during the first step. The amount of water present in the
reaction medium and its evolution during the reaction time
is a key variable for the success of the global process.
The authors thank project MAT 2006-14274-C02-01,
Consilider Ingenio 2009 CDS 00050 Multicat and Prometeo
2008 GV for financial support. NV thanks ITQ for a fellowship.
15 A. Takagaki, C. Tagusagawa and K. Domen, Chem. Commun.,
2008, 5363.
Notes and references
1 W. von Rybinski and K. Hill, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37,
1328.
2 F. A. Hughes and B. W. Lew, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 1970, 47, 162.
3 (a) A. J. J. Straathof, J. Romein, F. van Rantwitj, A. P. G.
Kieboom and H. Van Bekkum, Starch/Sta¨rke, 1987, 39, 362;
(b) A. J. J. Straathof, H. van Bekkum and A. P. G. Kieboom,
16 (a) A. Onda, T. Ochi and K. Yanagisawa, Green Chem., 2008, 10,
1033; (b) A. Onda, T. Ochi and K. Yanagisawa, Top. Catal., 2009,
52, 801.
17 (a) R. P. Swatloski, S. K. Spear, J. D. Holbrey and R. Rogers,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 4974; (b) A. Pinkert, K. N. Marsh,
S. Pang and M. P. Staiger, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 6712.
18 C. Li and Z. K. Zhao, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2007, 349, 1847.
Starch/Starke, 1988, 40, 229.
¨
4 (a) A. Corma, S. Iborra, S. Miquel and J. Primo, J. Catal., 1996,
161, 713; (b) M. A. Camblor, A. Corma, S. Iborra, S. Miquel,
J. Primo and S. Valencia, J. Catal., 1997, 172, 76.
5 M. J. Climent, A. Corma, S. Iborra, S. Miquel, J. Primo and
F. Rey, J. Catal., 1999, 183, 76.
6 D. D. Harris, European Patent 0096917, 1983.
7 M. H. K. Mao, L. E. Miller and J. M. Weeman, US Patent
4,393,203, 1983.
19 R. Rinaldi, R. Palkovits and F. Schuth, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2008, 47, 8047.
20 W. Deng, Mi Liu, Q. Zhang, X. Tan and Y. Wang, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 2668.
21 E. F. Kozhevnikova and I. V. Kozhevnikov, J. Catal., 2004, 224,
164.
22 A. Corma, S. B. A. Hamid, S. Iborra and A. Velty, ChemSusChem,
2008, 1, 85.
¨
8 (a) G. W. Huber, S. Iborra and A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106,
4044; (b) G. W. Huber and A. Corma, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2007, 46, 7184; (c) M. Mascal and E. B. Nikittin, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 7924.
23 L. Vanoye, M. Fanselow, J. D. Holbrey, M. P. Atkins and
K. R. Seddon, Green Chem., 2009, 11, 390.
24 R. Rinaldi, N. Meine, J. vom Stein, R. Palkovits and F. Schuth,
¨
ChemSusChem, 2010, 3, 266.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
4410 | Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 4408–4410