M.S.A. Begum et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 363 (2010) 2144–2148
2147
Fig. 4. Polyhedral representation of the {Cu(l3-S)N}1 (1), {Cu(l3-S)N}12 (2) and {Cu(l-S)N}4 (3) cores.
significantly different. The intra-layer distances in the copper, sul-
fur and nitrogen sub-lattices are 1.660, 2.187 and 3.812 Å, respec-
tively. By superposition of the three individual sub-lattices, the
Acknowledgements
M.S.A.B. thanks the Alexander von Humboldt foundation (AvH),
Germany and the University of Paderborn, Germany for the award
of the renewed research fellowship (2009), the Council of Scientific
and Industrial Research, (CSIR), India for the award of the Senior
Research Associateship (2006–2009) under the Scientists’ Pool
scheme and the Department of Science and Technology (DST), In-
dia for the award of Fast track scheme for young scientists.
overall {Cu(l3-S)N} core in 1 is obtained.
The formation of the polymeric network of 1 is a result of the
less commonly observed tetrahedral connectivity of CuI. Each
{Cu(l3-S)3N} coordination tetrahedron is connected to five other
ones, to the first one by an edge-sharing interaction and to the
remaining ones by vertex-sharing modes (Fig. 4, 1). Since the cor-
ner defined by N is not shared, a two-dimensional polymeric struc-
ture is formed rather than a three dimensional one. In the cyclic
Appendix A. Supplementary material
{Cu2S2} units the
l3-bridging sulfur donors are located within
the sum of their van der Waals radii (SꢂꢂꢂS 3.272 Å) and the CuIꢂꢂꢂCuI
intermetallic separation within the rhomb is 3.420 Å. The copper(I)
complex of N-methylated ligand, N,N0-dimethylaminobenzenethiol
CCDC 730041 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
for 1. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cam-
is neutral and trinuclear with l2-bridging thiolate donors and the
geometry around the CuI centers is trigonal planar [10]. On the
other hand, the CuI complexes of the imino derivatives of 2-amino-
benzenethiol are tetranuclear with trigonal geometry or octanucle-
ar or dodecanuclear with pseudo-tetrahedral geometries around
the CuI centers (Fig. 4, 2 and 3).
References
The trigonal butterfly-type architecture (Fig. 4, 3) is formed by
[1] G. Henkel, B. Krebs, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 801.
[2] G. Henkel, A. Müller, S. Weissgräber, G. Buse, T. Soulimane, G.C.M. Steffens, H.-
F. Nolting, Angew. Chem. 107 (1995) 1615.
[3] G. Henkel, A. Müller, S. Weissgräber, G. Buse, T. Soulimane, G.C.M. Steffens, H.-
F. Nolting, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 34 (1995) 1488.
[4] B. Krebs, G. Henkel, Angew. Chem. 103 (1991) 785.
[5] B. Krebs, G. Henkel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 30 (1991) 769.
[6] M.S.A. Begum, O. Seewald, U. Flörke, G. Henkel, Inorg. Chim. Acta 361 (2008)
1868.
[7] J. Schneider, M. Köckerling, R. Kopitzky, G. Henkel, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2003)
1727.
[8] K. Tatsuya, N. Masato, M. Nishijima, N. Koichi, I.-K. Asako, K. Takumi, Chem.
Eur. J. 14 (2008) 9842.
[Cu(l-S)2N] corner sharing triangles whereas the double wheel
architecture is formed by the [Cu(
l3-S)3N] adjacent edge-sharing
tetrahedra (Fig. 4, 2) [6]. In all of the reported examples, the Cu–
S–Cu bridging angles (ca. 64°–74°) are acute and the CuIꢂꢂꢂCuI dis-
tances are short (ca. 2.67 Å). But in the complex 1, these angles
are around 92°, and the intermetallic separations are significantly
longer (ca. 3.420 Å). The structural features of [Cu(abt)]1 prove
that the geometry of the [Cu(l3-S)3N] core is governed by the type
of polyhedral connectivity, which in turn depends upon the steric
demands of the ligand. Thus the N-substituted compounds form
oligomers whereas the unsubstituted abt forms a polymer with un-
ique tetrahedral connectivity.
[9] A.F. Stange, K.W. Klinkhammer, W. Kaim, Inorg. Chem. 35 (1996) 4087.
[10] M.D. Janssen, J.G. Donkervoort, S.B. van Berlekom, A.L. Spek, D.M. Grove, G. van
Koten, Inorg. Chem. 35 (1996) 4752.
[11] E.C. Brown, N.W. Aboelella, A.M. Reynolds, G. Aullon, A. Alvarez, W.B. Tolman,
Inorg. Chem. 43 (2004) 3335.
[12] L.J. Ashfield, A.R. Cowley, J.R. Dilworth, P.S. Donnelly, Inorg. Chem. 43 (2004)
4121.
[13] T. Kawamoto, N. Ohkoshi, I. Nagasawy, H. Kuma, Y. Kushi, Chem. Lett. (1997)
553.
4. Conclusions
[14] E.S. Raper, J.R. Crighton, W. Clegg, Inorg. Chim. Acta 237 (1995) 87.
[15] I.G. Dance, Polyhedron 5 (1986) 1037.
The metallopolymer [Cu(abt)] (1) described hitherto has been
1
[16] P.J. Blower, J.R. Dilworth, Coord. Chem. Rev. 76 (1987) 121.
[17] G. Henkel, B. Krebs, W. Schmidt, Angew. Chem. 104 (1992) 1380.
[18] G. Henkel, B. Krebs, W. Schmidt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 31 (1992) 1366.
[19] P. Ghosh, A. Begum, E. Bill, T. Weyhermüller, K. Wieghardt, Inorg. Chem. 42
(2003) 3208.
[20] D. Sellmann, S. Emig, F.W. Heinemann, F. Knoch, Angew. Chem. 109 (1997)
1250.
[21] D. Sellmann, S. Emig, F.W. Heinemann, F. Knoch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
36 (1997) 1201.
synthesized and its structure has been determined, which indicates
the formation of a two-dimensional polymeric structure. Further-
more, three interpenetrating double-layered sub-lattices, formed
by Cu, S and N, respectively, can be identified, which show close
structural relationships with similar double-layers present in black
phosphorus. The structure of 1 with its unique tetrahedral connec-
tivity is a novel addition to the class of copper(I) oligomeric com-
plexes of N/S ligands, which form complexes of varying
nuclearities.
[22] D. Sellmann, S. Emig, F.W. Heinemann, Angew. Chem. 109 (1997) 1808.
[23] D. Sellmann, S. Emig, F.W. Heinemann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 36 (1997)
1734.