M. Aschi et al.
(m/z 507), and [(S • T•CoCH2ONO2]+ (m/z 507,
S
=
α-
400, 387, and 386, respectively, whereas fragment ions 4 and 5 by
their dehydrated forms, i.e. m/z 162 and 148, respectively. The pair
of fragment ions differing for the loss of a hydrogen or a water
molecule will be henceforth denoted by writing in italic the mass
oftheparentfragmention, e.g. m/z 402 form/z 402+m/z 400, and
m/z 180 for m/z 180+m/z 162. The neutral species accompanying
their formation will be denoted in italic as well [e.g. HNO3 for the
loss of HNO3 (to give m/z 402) and of HNO3 + H2 (to give m/z 400
from m/z 465)].
isopropylaminomethyl)benzyl alcohol).
To discriminate between these two structures, the experiments
were repeated by using d8-T, instead of T. In this case, we de-
tected two signals at m/z 523 and m/z 515, corresponding to
[(d8-T)2CoNO3]+ (anditsprotomer), and[(d8-T • P•CoCH2ONO2]+
complexes, respectively. CID of m/z 523 does not produce any
detectable amounts of m/z 447, which would be formed by for-
mal elimination of CH2ONO2 from [(d8-S • d8-T • CoCH2ONO2]+.
Rather, it yields, besides m/z 202 (d8-T + H+), two other signals
at m/z 460 and at m/z 457 which suggest the fragmentation se-
quence of Scheme 2. The loss of the HNO3 fragment necessarily
involves an intracomplex H shift, whereas the accompanying
loss of HD requires the oxidation of the –CDOH–moiety of
d8-T to –CO–. The CID fragmentation of m/z 515 ions gen-
erates several fragment ions, including m/z 439, m/z 436, m/z
202 (d8-T + H+), and m/z 180 (P + H+). Detection of these frag-
mentionsconfirmstheoccurrenceofthe[d8-T • P•CoCH2ONO2]+
structure and its fragmentation sequence (Scheme 3). The ex-
clusive loss of HD further confirms what is mentioned earlier
about the oxidation of the –CDOH–moiety of d8-T to yield
–CO–.
Having established the strict relationship between the CID
patterns of isomeric binary complexes and their structures, we can
nowproceedtotheanalysisofthemechanismoftheirformationin
ESI droplets. Besides the m/z 479 ion, nominally corresponding to
the [((+)-P)2CoNO3]+ structure, ESI of Co(NO3)2/CH3OH solutions
containing (+)-P and E [i.e (+)-E, (−)-E, (+)-E• HCl, or (+)-
E•HCl] leads to the formation of sufficiently intense m/z 465 peaks
nominally corresponding to the [E • (+)-P•CoNO3]+ adducts. As
shown in Scheme 4, an ion fragmentation pattern analogous to
that of the m/z 479 companion (Scheme 1) was observed for the
m/z 465 species, characterized by: (1) loss of HNO3 (m/z 402);
(2) formal loss of CH2ONO2 (m/z 389); (3) formal loss of CH3ONO2
(m/z 388); (4) formation of P + H+ (m/z 180); and (5) formation of
E + H+ (m/z 166). As shown earlier for similar structures, fragment
ions 1–3 are accompanied by their dehydrogenated forms, i.e. m/z
The combined relative abundances of each pair of fragment
ions are given in Figs 1 and 2 as a function of the collision
energy Elab (Fig. 1) and of the composition of the relevant mixtures
at Elab = 15 eV (Fig. 2). As for m/z 479, CID of m/z 465 yields
a fragmentation pattern which reflects not only the expected
connectivity of the [E • P•CoNO3]+ complex (Scheme 4, paths (a)),
but also that of other isomeric structures (Scheme 4, paths (b)).
Their formation requires the transfer of a CHx (x = 2, 3) group
to the nitrate moiety of the complex and the conversion of the
P ligand to ephedrine or pseudoephedrine and/or that of the E
ligand to norephedrine or norpseudoephedrine (N in Scheme 4).
At this point, another question arises: what is the CHx (x = 2, 3)
group donor? Certainly, the P molecule. Indeed, a m/z 493 ion
is formed in the ESI of the Co(NO3)2/CH3OH solutions with
only P, whose CID pattern is dominated by the formal loss of
CH2ONO2 (to give m/z 417) and CH3ONO2 (to give m/z 416).[1] This
implies that both the [P2CoCH2ONO2]+ and [(P2-H)CoCH3ONO2]+
isomers contribute to the m/z 493 ion. In contrast, no m/z 465
ion is observable in the ESI of the Co(NO3)2/CH3OH solutions with
only E in any chemical form and configuration. This means that
both E and E•HCl, as well as the solvent MeOH, are unable to
transfer the CHx (x = 2, 3) group to the nitrate moiety of the
complex to give the [E2CoCH2ONO2]+ and [(E2-H)CoCH3ONO2]+
structures. Rather, the only binary complex formed in the ESI
of E/Co(NO3)2/CH3OH solutions corresponds to m/z 451, whose
CID pattern is only consistent with the expected [E2CoNO3]+ {or
[(E2-H)CoNO3H]+} structures.
Onthesegrounds,itisconcludedthatthecomplexes,generated
in the ESI of E/P/Co(NO3)2/CH3OH solutions, can undergo the
CHx (x = 2, 3) group transfer only from P and not from E (or E•HCl)
or the solvent MeOH. Furthermore, the observation that the ion
patterns of both m/z 465 and m/z 479[1] dramatically depend on
the configuration and the chemical form of ephedrine E in the
E/P/Co(NO3)2/CH3OH mixtures lends strong support to the view
of the CHx (x = 2, 3) transfer as taking place inside higher order
complexes, e.g. [( )-E• ((+)-P)2 • CoNO3]+, from a P ligand to the
nitrate moiety. This view is supported by the observation that the
ionic patterns from CID of m/z 465 are strongly sensitive to: (1) the
specific form of ephedrine, whether as a neutral molecule or as
the hydrochloride salt (cfr. e.g. (+)-P/(+)-E and (+)-P/(+)-E•HCl:
Fig. 1); (2) the [P]/[E] concentration ratio (sol.1–sol.3 in Fig. 2); and
(3) the specific configuration of ephedrine (cfr. e.g. (+)-P/(+)-E
and (+)-P/(−)-E: Fig. 1).
[(d8-T)2CoNO3]+
[((d8-T)2-H)CoNO3H]+
(m/z 523)
(m/z 523)
CID
-HNO3
- HD
[((d8-T)2-H)Co]+
[((d8-T)2-H2D)Co]+
(m/z 460)
(m/z 457)
Scheme 2. Fragmentation sequence of the m/z 523 ion suggesting the
occurrence of the [(d8-T)2 • CoNO3]+ structure.
[d8-T•P•CoCH2ONO2]+
Having identified the species involved in fast stereoselective
reactions in the ESI nanodroplets from E/P/Co(NO3)2/CH3OH
mixtures, wearenowinterestedincheckingwhethertheefficiency
of these reactions depends on the structure and the electronic
properties of the aminoalcoholic ligands. To this purpose, we
investigated the CID of the binary complexes formed in the
ESI of Co(NO3)2/CH3OH mixtures with the other aminoalcohols
listed in Table 1 (generically denoted as W and Y in Table 2).
‘No’ in Table 2 means that the CID pattern of the relevant binary
complex is exclusively consistent with the [WYCoNO3]+ structure
(m/z 515)
-CH2ONO2 CID
- HD
[d8-T•P•Co]+
[(d8-T-HD)•P•Co]+
(m/z 439)
(m/z 436)
Scheme 3. Fragmentation sequence of the m/z 515 ion suggesting the
occurrence of the [d8-T • P•CH2CoNO3]+ structure.
c
Copyright ꢀ 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Mass. Spectrom. 2009, 44, 1038–1046