Organic Letters
Letter
the C6-epimer of OpA.1,2 Molecular modeling studies8 suggest
one rationale for significant loss of bioactivity of 6-epi-
ophiobolin congeners, namely significant alteration of the
eight-membered B-ring conformation. This altered conforma-
tion changes the orientation of the C21 aldehyde, thus
impacting any potential Paal−Knorr condensation with the
ketoaldehyde and also possibly impacting potential Michael
additions to the unsaturated aldehyde.8 Therefore, we
incorporate the cyclooctene into our current proposed
pharmacophore (Figure 1). Efforts toward a broader, deep-
seated SAR profile of the ophiobolins is precluded by structural
convergence of the natural ophiobolins. Thus, we envisioned
that application of PDR would enable a greater dissection of
minimal structural requirements for anticancer activity through
synthesis of simplified derivatives of OpA that retain structural
features known to be critical for activity. Our initial PDR-
guided studies toward this goal are described herein.
To date, three completed total syntheses of various
ophiobolin and derivatives have been reported including the
synthesis of OpA by the Nakada group who employed a late-
stage ring closing metathesis (RCM) to form the 8-membered
B-ring20,21 and ophiobolin C by the Kishi group who employed
a Nozaki−Hiyama−Kishi coupling to generate the C-ring.22
Recently, Maimone reported an elegant 9-step radical cascade
process to fashion the BC-ring system of (−)-6-epi-OpN,23 and
more recently a 15-step synthesis of (+)-6-epi-OpA employing
a similar synthetic strategy.24
Nakada employing an RCM reaction.20,21 Michael addition of
a cuprate derived from iodide 6 to cyclopentenone 5 to form
the C1−C4 bond followed by facially selective protonation
would enable control of the key C6-stereocenter. A protected
secondary alcohol at C3 would enable variations in
substitution and also stereochemistry at this center. The
described synthetic strategy sets the stage for more elaborate
tricyclic congeners or the natural product itself. Importantly,
application of PDR enables the exploration of key strategic
bond disconnections that typically would only be considered
model studies in a total synthesis effort; however, these studies
can be utilized to access simplified derivatives and provide
important SAR information as described herein.
We initiated our synthetic efforts by studying the conjugate
addition of cuprate reagents derived from known neopentyl
iodide 12a26 to enone ( )-5, to mimic the eventual
cyclopentyl cuprate that would be required for tricyclic analogs
(Scheme 1). However, several problems quickly surfaced
Scheme 1. Development of the Conjugate Addition
Sequence Leading to Enol Acetate 16
Herein, we report Stage I and an initial Stage II study of our
PDR approach toward OpA with the goal of gaining further
SAR information for this complex sesterterpene. To address
questions for the C6-stereochemistry, the C3-hydroxy group,
and required ring systems for bioactivity, we applied PDR to
arrive at simplified monocyclic (e.g., known ketoaldehyde
( )-1125) and bicyclic (e.g., ( )-10) derivatives (Figure 2), all
bearing our current hypothesized minimal pharmacophore
(Figure 2, yellow highlight).
Our synthetic strategy placed an emphasis on installing the
critical C6-stereocenter while retaining flexibility at certain
positions such as the C3-hydroxyl bearing center to invert
stereochemistry or alter substitution. For synthesis of the
challenging 8-membered B-ring, we relied on the strategy of
including the anticipated low reactivity of the neopentyl
cuprate reagent which could be overcome by forming the more
reactive higher order organocuprate using the method of
Lipshutz.27 Unfortunately, the resulting cuprate was prone to
5-exo-trig cyclization (see inset, Scheme 1),26,28 likely
accelerated by the Thorpe−Ingold (gem-dimethyl) effect.
This side reaction is unavoidable even at −78 °C unless the
olefin is trisubstituted, directing us toward a defensive
strategy29 and the use of iodide 1330 bearing a pendant
trisubstituted alkene known to lower the rate of intramolecular
cyclization.31 Lithium−halogen exchange32 followed by
addition of (2-thienyl)Cu(CN)Li27 converted iodide 13 into
a reactive organocuprate species leading to conjugate addition
without detectable 5-exo-trig cyclization at −78 °C (Scheme
1). Use of TMSCl33,34 was also beneficial for this conjugate
addition but led to a TMS enol ether that was too labile for
isolation. This problem was circumvented by treating the
crude, intermediate silyl enol ether ( )-15 directly with MeLi
followed by addition of Ac2O. This led to in situ conversion to
the more stable and readily purified enol acetate ( )-16.35
Overall, this process entailed a one-pot conjugate addition/
double-enolate trapping for the key C1−C5 bond construc-
tion. However, enol acetate ( )-16 failed to undergo the
subsequent desired RCM reaction36−39 (not shown) to deliver
the targeted cyclooctene despite trying a variety of conditions.
We anticipated that the syn-substituted dienyl cyclopentane
( )-18 would undergo the RCM reaction more readily.
Toward this end, we next attempted to introduce the C6
stereocenter prior to the RCM through a facially selective
Figure 2. (a) Pharmacophore-directed retrosynthesis applied to OpA.
(b) Staged syntheses of OpA derivatives including monocyclic ( )-11
and bicyclic ( )-10 derivatives bearing minimal pharmacophore
described herein.
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX