advantage of the strong C-H···anion interaction between the
triazole and the anions and the photoisomerization of
azobenzen, we thus envisioned that plugging the photore-
sponsive azobenzene into the phenyl-triazole oligomers could
provide a photoswitchable foldamer with controllable changes
in binding affinity for anions due to the light-controlled
transition in conformation. We propose (Scheme 1) that while
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Photoswitch 1
Scheme 1. Photoswitch 1 Studied Herein and Proposed
Different Binding Model for Its Two Photoisomers to Anions
1 adopts the trans conformation (1trans), its binding affinities
for anions would be weak as a result of the extended
conformation of the azobenzene core; however, while 1
adopts the cis form (1cis) upon irradiation with UV light, its
binding to the anions would be strengthened as a result of
the spatial preference between the anions and the receptor.
The controllable affinities for anions could thus be achieved
through reversible photoisomerization.
To evaluate this hypothesis, photoswitch 1 (Scheme 1) was
designed to possess two phenyl-1,2,3-triazole units with an
azobenzene moiety at the core. The chain length of 1 was
deliberately chosen to allow folding of the entire chain but
avoid π-stacking within intramolecular strand in the trans
form.10 A water-soluble 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)-ethoxy side
chain was introduced to each phenyl group because it was
proven be conducive to the folding in polar solvents such as
acetone via solvophobic interaction.11
The synthesis of compound 1 is outlined in Scheme 2.
The starting material pentabromophenol 2 was reduced to
give 3. Via a Mitsunobu reaction,12 a water-soluble side chain
was attached to provide 4, one bromo of which was converted
to azide followed by reduction to give 6. Compound 6 was
ethynylated to generate 7 by the Sonogashira reaction with
excess (trimethylsilyl)-acetylene.13 Then, coupling 7 itself
in the presence of CuI afforded azobenzene 8, followed by
removal of the TMS group under a basic conditions to yield
9. Finally, compound 1 was obtained by coupling 8 with 5
through “click chemistry”.14
The photoresponsive properties of 1 were first investigated
by UV-vis spectroscopy in acetone (Figure S1 in Supporting
Information). Upon UV light irradiation, the intensity of the
π-π* transition band at 339 nm shows a sharp descent by
80%, and the intensity of the n-π* transition band at 440
nm slightly increased, indicative of the photoisomerization
of 1 from the trans to the cis state.15 After irradiation of the
above solution with the visible light, 77% intensity of the
absorption at 339 nm was recovered, suggesting that the cis
reversibly switched to the trans. NMR measurements pro-
vided additional information about the photoisomerization
of 1. At a normal state, 1 prefers to exist in the trans form,
and the folding of 1trans was strongly suggested by the
correlations (strong Hd-Hg rather than Hd-He) in 2D
NOESY spectrum (Figure S2 in Supporting Information),
in which the signals were assigned on the basis of 2D NMR
experiments (Figures S3-S6 in Supporting Information).
1trans photoisomerized to 1cis rapidly upon irradiation at 365
nm light, and the ratio of 1trans/1cis was determined to be
18:82 while a photostationary state was achieved. Isomer-
ization caused a typical change in the 1H NMR spectra of 1
(Figure 1):16 the protons He, Hg and especially Hf shift
dramatically to the high field (∆δ ) -0.99 ppm for He,
-1.03 ppm for Hf, and -0.34 ppm for Hg), and the triazole
was also considerably shifted to the upfield (∆δ ) -0.23
ppm). In the NOE spectrum of 1cis (Figure S7 in Supporting
Information), Hd simultaneously has strong correlations with
Hc, Hb, He and Hg. Because of the properties of azobenzene
and the symmetric structure of 1, it is reasonable to speculate
that 1cis adopted a scissor-like conformation in solution
(10) Intramolecular π-stacking would help to stabilize the conforma-
tion of the helix but hinders the isomerization upon irradiation with UV
light.
(11) (a) Prince, R. B.; Saven, J. G.; Wolynes, P. G.; Moore, J. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3114–3121. (b) Khan, A.; Kaiser, C.; Hecht, S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1878–1881.
(12) Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1–28.
(13) Sonogashira, K. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions;
Diederich, F., Stang, P. J. , Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1998; p 203.
(14) (a) Tornoe, C. W.; Christensen, C.; Meldal, M. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 3057–3064. (b) Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021.
(15) Khayer, K.; Sander, W. J. Bangladesh Acad. Sci. 2008, 32, 111–
116.
(16) Haberhauer, G.; Kallweit, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
2418–2421.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 16, 2010
3631