C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 3. Reductive Elimination of Arylamines from Parent Amido
Complexes 2a-d and Arylamido Complexes 3a-b
BINAP-ligated arylpalladium parent amido complexes did
not undergo reductive elimination of arylamines. Reaction of
(L)Pd(Ar)(Br) (L ) DPPF, BINAP, Ar ) C6H4-p-OMe, Ph) with
ammonia and NaO-t-Bu did not lead to (L)Pd(Ar)(NH2) or primary
arylamines; these reactions led to homocoupling of the aryl ligand
and unidentified Pd side products. The alternative route to a BINAP-
ligated parent amido complex involving deprotonation of
[(BINAP)Pd(Ph)(NH3)](OTf)18 led to a new species by 31P NMR
that formed biphenyl products, free PPh3, and less than 5% of
diphenylamine. Consistent with these results, the combination of a
Pd(0) precatalyst and DPPF or BINAP does not catalyze the
monoarylation of ammonia under the previously described condi-
tions for reactions catalyzed by CyPF-t-Bu-ligated palladium.5
a
These data with two common arylphosphines imply that arylpal-
ladium parent amido complexes undergo reductive elimination more
slowly than arylpalladium alkylamido and arylamido complexes,
are more open to competing side reactions, or both.
In contrast, both parent amido complexes and arylamido com-
plexes ligated by CyPF-t-Bu undergo reductive elimination, as
shown in Scheme 3. In the presence of 2 equiv of PPh3 to trap the
Pd(0) product, the complexes ligated by CyPF-t-Bu formed the
primary arylamines in 50-86% yield for the two-step sequence at
room temperature; the reductive elimination step formed the
arylamine in 60-90% yield and the Pd(0) species in 55-85% yield.
The aniline products formed in higher yields when they were
allowed to undergo reductive elimination at elevated temperatures,
the largest difference being observed for the reductive elimination
of p-toluidine from 2b.
Reactions of the arylpalladium anilides 3a and 3b occurred
rapidly at room temperature to form diarylamine products in
36-53% yield for the two-step sequence and 60-70% for the
reductive elimination step. This fast reductive elimination from the
arylamido complex at room temperature, along with the fast
formation of the N-alkyl arylamine from reaction of 1a with iso-
butylamine and NaO-t-Bu, shows qualitatively that reductive
elimination from the parent amido complex is slower than from
both more electron-poor arylamido complexes and more electron-
rich alkylamido complexes.
Rate constants for reductive eliminations from the parent amido
and arylamido complexes in the presence of 2 equiv of PPh3
determined by 31P NMR spectroscopy at room temperature are
shown in Scheme 3.19 Reactions conducted with 2, 4, and 8 equiv
of added PPh3 occurred with indistinguishable rate constants,
indicating that the reductive elimination is zero-order in added
phosphine and occurs directly from the arylpalladium amide.
The data in Scheme 3 reveal large differences in the rates for
reductive elimination from the various arylpalladium parent amido
complexes. The rate constant for reductive elimination from the
para-anisylpalladium complex 2a was an order of magnitude
smaller than that from the less electron-rich para-tolyl complex
2b. Complexes 2c and 2d containing an ortho substituent on the
aryl group underwent reductive elimination nearly 50 times faster
than those containing para substituents.
a GC yield of monoarylamine or diarylamine at 20 °C for the reductive
elimination step. b At 20 °C. c Determined by monitoring the decay of the
amido or arylamido complex by 31P NMR spectroscopy. d THF/dioxane
mixture of 3:2. e Average of 2-4 runs. A standard deviation is provided
for the cases that are run more than twice and have the largest errors; the
rate constants for cases run twice are within 5% of each other. f Amido
complex generated with KO-t-Bu as the base. g Amido complex generated
with LiO-t-Bu as the base.
complexes are known to be highly basic,1-3 the smaller size of
the parent amido ligand is, most likely, responsible for the large
differences in the rates of reductive elimination.
To understand the thermodynamic properties of the different
amido complexes and origins of the relative rates for reductive
elimination, we assessed the different thermodynamic stabilities of
the parent amido and arylamido complexes, relative to the free
amines, by both computational and experimental methods, and we
computed the barriers to reductive elimination from a series of
arylpalladium amido complexes. To distinguish between steric and
electronic effects on the stability and reactivity of the complexes
containing the different amido groups, we assessed by DFT
calculations the thermodynamic properties and barriers for reductive
eliminations involving complexes in which steric effects should
have less of an influence on the relative thermodynamic stability
of the complexes and rates for reductive elimination than they do
in the experimental system.
A quantitative assessment of the relative rates for reductive
elimination from complexes containing different types of amido
groups is also contained in Scheme 3. The para-anisylamido
complex 3a reacted 100 times faster than the corresponding parent
amido complex 2a, and the para-tolylamido complex 3b reacted
150 times faster than the corresponding parent amido complex 2b,
the half-life for reaction of 3b being less than a minute. Because
we have shown previously that amido complexes containing more
basic nitrogen atoms undergo faster reductive eliminations than
those with less basic nitrogen atoms,15 and terminal amido
The stability of the amido complexes, transition states for C-N
reductive elimination, and overall free energies for formation of
the amine product in dioxane solvent were calculated for a series
of cis-bis(trimethylphosphine)-ligated phenylpalladium amido com-
plexes, and the results of this analysis are shown in Figure 1. As
expected from the greater acidity of aniline,11 the equilibrium
between the combination of the arylamido complex and ammonia
and the combination of the parent amido complex and aniline
favored the arylamido complex by a free energy of 1.9 kcal/mol.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 34, 2010 11831