536
L. Wang et al. / Catalysis Communications 11 (2010) 532–536
Table 4
4. Conclusion
Cross-coupling of aldoximes and other ketoximes with phenylboronic acids catalyzed
by supported copper complexa.
In summary, a polymer-supported copper-catalyzed cross-cou-
pling of ketoximes and aldoximes with arylboronic acids under
mild reaction conditions have been developed. This methodology
offered a direct way to construct O-aryloxime ether motifs in mod-
erate to good yields using catalytic amount of catalyst. The scope of
the both oximes and arylboronic acids were investigated and a
variety of substrates could participate in the process. The poly-
mer-supported catalysis system not only could avoid deoximation
effectively, but also was expected to contribute to the development
of benign chemical process.
Entry Oxime
1
Product
Yield (%)b
40
OH
H
N
O
H
N
2
46
38
OH
H
N
O
H
N
Acknowledgment
MeO
MeO
We gratefully thank Nature and Science Foundation of Jiangsu
Province (BK2007592) for financial support.
3
OH
N
O
N
H
Appendix A. Supplementary material
H
Cl
Cl
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
4
65
55
OH
N
O
N
Reference
[1] P. Mailliet, J.M. Ruxer, F. Thompson, C.C. Luc, New 3-aryl-1,2-benzisoxazole
derivatives, compositions containing them and their use for treating cancer.
French Patent FR 288236, 2006.
[2] J.T. Strupczewski, R.C. Allen, B.A. Gardner, B.L. Schmid, U. Stache, E.J.
Glamkowski, M.C. Jones, D.B. Ellis, F.P. Huger, R.W. Dunn, J. Med. Chem. 28
(1985) 761.
5
OH
N
O
N
[3] A. Mooradian, P.E. Dupont, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 4 (1967) 441.
[4] B.B. Jacob, Synthesis (1975) 782.
[5] E.P. Nesynov, Zh. Org. Khim. 12 (1976) 1955.
[6] S.M. Johnson, H.M. Petrassi, S.K. Palaninathan, N.N. Mohamed mohaideen, H.E.
Purkey, C. Nichols, K.P. Chiang, T. Walkup, J.C. Sacchettini, K.B. Sharpless, J.W.
Kelly, J. Med. Chem. 48 (2005) 1576.
[7] P.D. Nonappa, K. Pandurangan, U. Maitra, S. Wailes, Org. Lett. 9 (2007) 2767.
[8] P.Y.S. Lam, C.G. Clark, S. Saubern, J. Adams, K.M. Averill, D.M.T. Chan, A. Combs,
Synlett. (2000) 674.
a
Reaction conditions: oxime (0.5 mmol), phenylboronic acid (1 mmol), pyridine
(1.5 mmol), DCE (3 mL), catalyst (0.05 mmol), oxygen ball, 50 °C and 48 h.
b
Isolated yield.
[9] P.Y.S. Lam, C.G. Clark, S. Saubern, J. Adams, M.P. Winters, D.M.T. Chan, A.
Combs, Tetrahedron Lett. 39 (1998) 2941.
[10] D.A. Evans, J.L. Katz, T.R. West, Tetrahedron Lett. 39 (1998) 2937.
[11] D.M.T. Chan, K.L. Monaco, R.-P. Wang, M.P. Winters, Tetrahedron Lett. 39
(1998) 2933.
[12] P.Y.S. Lam, S. Deudon, E. Hauptman, C.G. Clark, Tetrahedron Lett. 42 (2001) 2427.
[13] P.Y.S. Lam, S. Deudon, K.M. Averill, R. Li, M.Y. He, P. Desong, C.G. Clark, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 7600.
[14] J.P. Collman, M. Zhong, C. Zhang, S. Costanzo, J. Org. Chem. 66 (2001) 7892.
[15] A.D. Sagar, R.H. Tale, R.N. Adude, Tetrahedron Lett. 44 (2003) 7061.
[16] G.C.H. Chiang, T. Olsson, Org. Lett. 6 (2004) 3079.
[17] C. Moessner, C. Bolm, Org. Lett. 7 (2005) 2667.
[18] S.-B. Liu, Y. Yu, L.S. Liebeskind, Org. Lett. 9 (2007) 1947.
[19] A. Kar, I.A. Sayyed, W.-F. Lo, H.M. Kaiser, M. Beller, M.K. Tse, Org. Lett. 9 (2007)
3405.
[20] Z.-H. Zhang, Y. Yu, L.S. Liebeskind, Org. Lett. 10 (2008) 3005.
[21] A. Ali, A.G. Meyer, K.L. Tuck, Synlett. (2009) 955.
[22] S.V. Ley, I.R. Baxendale, R.N. Bream, P.S. Jackson, A.G. Leach, D.A. Longbottom,
M. Nesi, J.S. Scott, R.I. Storer, S.J. Taylor, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 (2000)
3815 (and references cited therein).
[23] N.E. Leadbeater, M. Macro, Chem. Rev. 102 (2002) 3217.
[24] V.B. Valodkar, G.L. Tembe, R.N. Ram, H.S. Rama, Catal. Lett. 90 (2003) 91.
[25] V.B. Valodkar, G.L. Tembe, M. Ravindranathan, R.N. Ram, H.S. Rama, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 208 (2004) 21.
were less active and gave the products in poor yields (19 and 10%,
respectively) (Table 3, entries 4 and 5).
Finally, different aldoximes such as benzaldoxime, 4-meth-
oxylbenzaldoxime, 4-chlorobenzaldoxime were also investigated
under identical conditions (Table 4). It was obvious that aldoximes
were less efficient than ketoximes. Other ketoximes such as benzo-
phenone oxime and cyclohexanone oxime were also proceeded
smoothly to afford the corresponding oxime ethers in moderate
to good yields.
It should be noted that there was no by-product in our system.
It was reported that the copper (II) was responsible for deoxima-
tion in the cross-coupling reaction between oxime and haloarenes
[7,31]. Hence, additive such as Na, K-tartrate was necessary and
used as a chelating agent. Contrary to the reported literature, the
deoximation did not occur in our reaction system. Initially, we
speculated that the amino acid ligand on the support may be used
as a chelating agent for copper (II). Thus, a number of control
experiments were done. When a mixture of acetophenone oxime
and Cu(OAc)2 was stirred in DCE at 50 °C, some degradation of
the oxime was indeed observed after 48 h. On the other hand,
when the oxime was added to the premixed Cu(OAc)2 and L-pro-
line in DCE and stirred at 50 °C, it remained unchanged after
48 h. Same result was obtained when similar experiment was car-
ried out using supported copper catalyst.
[26] B. Elman, C. Moberg, J. Organomet. Chem. 294 (1985) 117.
[27] R.-Q. Wei, Q. Wang, X.-N. Liu, M. Wang, P.-K. OuYang, Chin. Ion. Exch. Adsorpt.
21 (2005) 289.
[28] J.P. Collman, M. Zhong, Org. Lett. 2 (2000) 1233.
[29] Y.S.P. Lam, G. Vincent, C.G. Clark, S. Deudon, P.K. Jadhav, Tetrahedron Lett. 42
(2001) 3415.
[30] J.C. Antilla, S.L. Buchwald, Org. Lett. 3 (2001) 2077.
[31] N.V. Kaminskaia, N.M. Kostic, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. (2001) 1083.