2476
W.-W. W. Lee et al.
LETTER
O, 342 nm; C, 544 nm. HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C17H18O3S [M+]:
302.0977; found: 302.0973; [M+ – CH3]: 287.0742; found:
287.0747.
groups caused when compared with the much smaller cy-
clopentyl group on the anhydride moiety, which in turns
caused an increase in the bleaching effect of the colored
fulgide. The decrease in conversion of the respective
fulgides, in descending order, is generally: IPP > cyclo-
pentyl > cyclohexyl > cycloheptyl. Yields of the fulgides
with larger cycloalkyl groups also generally decreased.
Preparation of Isopropylidene (IPP) Diethyl Succinate
(Scheme 6)
Diethyl succinate (33.5 mL, 0.200 mol, 1.00 equiv) was added to a
ice-cooled solution of NaH (55–65%, moistened with mineral oil;
7.2 g, 0.300 mol, 1.50 equiv) in THF and stirred for 10 min. Then,
2 drops of EtOH or MeOH were added to initiate the reaction. Ace-
tone (18.4 mL, 0.250 mol, 1.25 equiv) was added dropwise over 15
min and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 18 h at r.t. The
reaction was quenched with 4 M HCl and extracted with EtOAc
(3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), fil-
tered, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The resulting brown
syrup was dissolved in EtOH (200 mL) and acidified with concd
H2SO4 (ca. 5–10 mL) and stirred for 1 h at 0 °C. The reaction mix-
ture was warmed up to r.t. and refluxed for 16 h. The reaction mix-
ture was quenched with sat. aq NaHCO3 and extracted with EtOAc
(3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), fil-
tered, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. Vacuum distillation
afforded isopropylidene (IPP) diethyl succinate as a clear colorless
oil (29.8 g, 69% yield). Rf = 0.46 (hexane–EtOAc = 4:1). 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 4.18 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 4.13 (q, J = 7.1
Hz, 2 H), 3.36 (s, 2 H), 2.14 (s, 3 H), 1.86 (s, 3 H), 1.27 (t, J = 7.1
Hz, 3 H), 1.24 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H) ppm. 13C NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 171.5, 167.9, 148.9, 120.7, 60.7, 60.2, 35.5, 23.3, 23.2,
14.2 ppm. FT-IR (film): 2983, 2938, 2909, 1738, 1719, 1642, 1446,
1369, 1335, 1283, 1223, 1178, 1135, 1079, 1032 cm–1. HRMS: m/z
calcd for C11H18O4 [M+]: 214.1205; found: 214.1207; [M+ – CH3]:
199.0970; found: 199.0971.
O
NaH, THF,
O
EtOH, H2SO4
OEt
OEt
O
OEt
+
EtO
O
O
Scheme 6
NaH, THF,
EtOH, H2SO4
O
O
O
O
OEt
OEt
OEt
+
EtO
O
7
13
Scheme 7
Preparation of 2,5-Dimethylthiophene Cyclopentylidene
Fulgide (1, Scheme 5)
Cyclopentenyl diethyl succinate (13, 1 equiv) was added into in a
solution of ice-cooled THF containing NaH (55–65%, moistened
with mineral oil, 1.5–1.8 equiv) prewashed with hexane and stirred
for 15 min. Then, 2–3 drops of EtOH were added into the reaction
mixture before dropwise addition of 3-acetyl-2,5-dimethyl
thiophene (1.1 equiv) over 30 min. The mixture was then allowed to
stir overnight followed by quenching of the reaction using ice-cold
water. After quenching of the reaction 10% Na2CO3 was used to ex-
tract the half-ester followed by the acidification of the basic solution
with 4 M HCl to liberate the acid-ester. Then, 4 × 25 mL of EtOAc
were used to extract the liberated acid-ester and the solvent was re-
moved in vacuo to afford a dark brown oil (crude NMR indicated
the presence of the half-ester). Saponification of the half-ester and
double bond isomerization of the b,g-unsaturation to the a,b-site
was initiated with 5% w/v NaOH in EtOH. The mixture was al-
lowed to stir for 1 h before refluxing for approximately 16 h. After
16 h, an aqueous solution (20–50 mL) of 25% NaOH was added and
the reaction mixture allowed to stir for an additional 3 h. A second
acid–base work up as before afforded the diacid as a brownish solid.
Preparation of Cyclopentenyl Diethyl Succinate (13, Scheme 7)
Synthesis was accomplished in a manner similar to that for the prep-
aration of isopropylidene (IPP) diethyl succinate. The cyclopen-
tanone was added into the stirring mixture of diethyl succinate and
NaH dropwise over 1 h. Usual esterification, work up and purifica-
tion of the crude reaction mixture using flash chromatography (8:1
hexane–EtOAc) afforded a clear colorless oil, 13 in 41% yield. Rf =
0.49 (hexane–EtOAc = 4:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d = 5.55
(s, 1 H), 4.18 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 4.12 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.67–
3.62 (m, 1 H), 2.97–2.88 (m, 1 H), 2.58–2.50 (m, 1 H), 2.35–2.30
(m, 4 H), 1.89–1.84 (m, 2 H), 1.28–1.22 (m, 6 H) ppm. 13C NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3): d = 172.6, 171.7, 139.9, 127.5, 60.8, 60.5, 43.5,
35.4, 33.4, 32.3, 23.1, 14.1 ppm. FT-IR (film): 2981, 2935, 2907,
2850, 1738, 1647, 1446, 1371, 1275, 1161, 1096, 1031, 858 cm–1.
HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C13H20O4 [M+]: 240.1362; found:
240.1358; [M+ – C2H6O]: 194.0943; found: 194.0944.
The crude reaction mixture was washed with brine and dried by Acknowledgment
standing in anhyd MgSO4. Solvents were removed in vacuo before
We would like to thank the A*STAR Graduate Fellowship for
the addition of excess acetyl chloride to the diacid in the dark to ini-
tiate the ring-closure to afford the desired fulgide. The mixture was
allowed to stir for approximately 5 h before removing the acetyl
chloride in vacuo. Purification of the crude reaction mixture using
flash chromatography (8:1 hexane–EtOAc) afforded 1 in 80% yield
(Z-isomer); yellow plates, mp 125–127 °C. The E-isomer was ob-
served to be present on TLC, but was not isolable. Rf = 0.61 (E-iso-
mer), 0.53 (Z-isomer) (hexane–EtOAc = 4:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 6.56 (s, 1 H), 3.01–2.99 (m, 2 H), 2.42 (s, 3 H), 2.37–
2.34 (m, 2 H), 2.30 (s, 3 H), 2.13 (s, 3 H), 1.91–1.87 (m, 2 H), 1.83–
1.80 (m, 2 H) ppm. 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d = 167.7, 164.3,
163.4, 148.8, 139.6, 137.7, 135.2, 125.8, 121.1, 117.5, 36.3, 35.2,
26.2, 25.6, 23.2, 15.1, 14.9 ppm. FT-IR (KBr): 3449, 2917, 2870,
1806, 1763, 1617, 1438, 1262, 1230, 1100, 927, 760 cm–1. UV/Vis:
funding this work.
References
(1) (a) Whittall, J. Photochromism: Molecules and Systems;
Dürr, H.; Bouas-Laurent, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam,
1990, 467–492. (b) Fan, M.; Yu, L.; Zhao, W. Main
Photochromic Families, In Organic Photochromic and
Thermochromic Compounds, Vol. 1; Crano, C.;
Guglielmetti, R., Eds.; Plenum Publishers: New York, 1999,
141–206. (c) Yokoyama, Y. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1717.
(2) Daub, J. Org. React. 1951, 6, 1.
(3) Solladie Chimia 1984, 38, 233.
Synlett 2005, No. 16, 2473–2477 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York