C. Blackburn et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 4795–4799
Floyd, Y.; Gray, K.; Hall, S.; Hawes, R.; Hughes, J.; Kosmidou, V.; Menzies, A.; 13. Each carboxylic acid (110
4799
l
mol), in DMF solution (0.5 mL) in a sealed tube, was
Mould, C.; Parker, A.; Stevens, C.; Watt, S.; Hooper, S.; Wilson, R.; Jayatilake, H.;
Busterson, B. A.; Cooper, C.; Shipley, J.; Hargrave, D.; Pritchard-Jones, K.;
Maitland, N.; Chenevix-Trench, G.; Riggins, G. J.; Bigner, D. D.; Palmieri, G.;
Cossu, A.; Flanagan, A.; Nicholson, A.; Ho, J. W. C.; Leung, S. Y.; Yuen, S. T.;
Weber, B. L.; Seigler, H. F.; Darrow, T. L.; Paterson, H.; Marais, R.; Marshall, C. J.;
Wooster, R.; Stratton, M. R.; Futreal, P. A. Nature 2002, 417, 949.
3. Hingorani, S. R.; Jacobetz, M. A.; Robertson, G. P.; Herlyn, M.; Tuveson, D. A.
Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 5198.
4. Flaherty, K.; Puzanov, I.; Sosman, J.; Kim, K.; Ribas, A.; McArthur, G.; Lee, R. J.;
Grippo, J. F.; Nolop, K.; Chapman, P. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 15.
5. Li, N.; Batt, D.; Warmuth, M. Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2007, 8, 452.
6. Lowinger, T. B.; Riedel, B.; Dumas, J.; Smith, R. A. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2002, 8,
2269.
activated by addition of a solution of EDCI (110
by a Tecan liquid handler. A solution of 2 (100
l
mol) in DMF (1 mL) delivered
mol) in a mixture of DMF
l
(0.5 mL) and dichloromethane (0.5 mL) was then added to each vessel and
agitated for 24 h. Each reaction mixture was then partitioned between
dichloromethane and water with the solvents dispensed and mixed by the
liquid handler. The organic phase from each extraction was collected and
evaporated from deep well plates to give the crude products that were purified
by preparative reverse phase HPLC using mass-directed fraction collection
conducted on an Agilent 1100 series LC/MSD instrument using a Waters
SunFire C18 5
lm Prep OBD column (19 ꢀ 150 mm). The compounds were
eluted with a water–MeCN gradient (0.1% formic acid) optimized by the
A2Prep Agilent software. All compounds described herein were further
characterized by 1H NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry.
7. King, A. J.; Patrick, D. R.; Batorsky, R. S.; Ho, M. L.; Do, H. T.; Zhang, S. Y.; Kumar,
R.; Rusnak, D. W.; Takle, A. K.; Wilson, D. M.; Hugger, E. Cancer Res. 2006, 66,
11100.
14. Inhibition of Raf kinase activity in whole cells was assessed by determining the
decrease in phosphorylation of the Raf kinase substrate pERK. This whole cell
ELISA assay utilized
a human melanoma cell line (A375) possessing the
8. The Raf enzyme inhibition assay was conducted in a Flash PlateÒ format in
mutation B-Raf V600E. A375 cells seeded overnight were incubated with Raf
inhibitors for 3 h at 37 °C. At the end of the incubation, the cells were fixed,
permeabilized, blocking buffer added and the plates were incubated overnight.
After the blocking buffer was discarded, the plates were incubated with anti-
phospho-ERK antibody for 1 h followed by treatment with anti-horse radish
peroxidase. Optical density was read at 650 nm for the substrate
tetramethybenzidine.
streptavidin coated 384 well plates monitoring the phosphorylation by 33P ATP
(0.5 lCi/reaction) of a biotinylated surrogate peptide at 4 lM concentration by
20 nM Raf mutant V600E at pH 7.5 buffered by 50 mM HEPES in the presence of
10 mM DTT and 50 mM MnCl2 at 30 °C. After 3 h the reaction was stopped by
addition of 100 mM EDTA and the reaction mixture transferred to a Flash
PlateÒ, incubated for 2 h and then read on a Topcount analyzer.
9. Pyrazoline 1 was found to have inhibitory IC50 values >10
l
M for a panel of
15. In general, inhibitory IC50 values for the wild-type (WT) enzyme B-Raf were
found to be comparable (within twofold) to those determined for the mutant
V600E. Compounds 20 (Table 1) and 42 (Table 2), for example, showed IC50
values of 17 nM and 18 nM, respectively, for inhibition of the WT enzyme.
16. Compounds 14, 17, 18, 19, and 20, for example, were found to have inhibitory
kinases that included CAMKII, CDK1, CDK2E, CHK1, CHK2, CKII, KDR2, FLT3,
CSF1R, KIT2, LCK2, PKA2, and FGFR1.
10. Duffey, M. O.; Adams, R.; Blackburn, C.; Chau, R.; Chen, S.; Galvin, K.; Garcia, K.;
Gould, A. E.; Greenspan, P.; Harrison, S.; Huang, S.-C.; Kim, M.-S.; Kulkarni, B.;
Langston, S.; Liu, J. X.; Ma, L.; Menon, S.; Nagayoshi, M.; Rowland, S.; Vos, T. J;
Xu, T.; Yang, J. J.; Yu, S.; Zhang, Q. Accompanying article.
IC50 values >10 lM for a panel of kinases that included KDR2, FLT3 and CSF1R,
KIT2, AKT2, and FGFR1.
11. Lange, J.; Coolen, H.; van Stuivenberg, H.; Dijksman, J.; Herremans, A.; Ronken,
E.; Keizer, H.; Tipker, K.; McCreary, A.; Veerman, W.; Wals, H.; Stork, B.;
Verveer, P.; den Hartog, A.; de Jong, N.; Adolfs, T.; Hoogendoorn, J.; Kruse, C. J.
Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 627.
17. Separation of compound 42 into its component enantiomers could be effected
by chiral chromatography on
methanol, 33% water containing 0.1% TFA. The early eluting isomer showed
IC50 values of 1.2 and 14 M in the enzymatic and cellular assays, respectively.
a Chirobiotic V column eluting with 67%
l
12. Abdel-Latif, N. A.; Sabry, N. M.; Mohamed, A. M.; Abdulla, M. M. Monatsh. Chem.
2007, 138, 715.
The later eluting isomer was considerably more active (15 nM in the enzymatic
assay and 280 nM in the cellular assay).