conditions, costly starting materials, and solvents or lack
stereocontrol at the double bond geometry.
arylpropiolic acids, resulting in stereoselective formation of
(Z)-vinyl sulfides under mild reaction conditions.
Phenylpropiolic acid (1a) and 4-methoxybenzenethiol (2a)
were used as the substrates to screen and optimize reaction
conditions. Copper(I) complexes generally gave significantly
higher yields of the product than copper(II) source (Table 1).
Numerous methods have been developed for the stereose-
lective synthesis of (E)-vinyl sulfides.10 In contrast, it has been
challenging to prepare Z-isomers.11 In 2005, Kondoh et al.12
reported the synthesis of (Z)-1-alkenyl sufides via a cesium-
catalyzed hydrothiolation of alkynes in the presence of 2,2,6,6-
tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl as a radical inhibitor. However,
this synthetic strategy is only applicable to alkylthiols. More
recently, Wang et al.13 have reported the synthesis of (Z)-1-
alkenyl sufides via a copper-catalyzed hydrothiolation of alkynes
with diaryl disulfides, but the reaction requires large amounts
of rongalite (4 equiv) as the radical initiator.
Table 1. Decarboxylative C-S Cross-Coupling under Different
Conditionsa
Recently, coupling reactions initiated by the decarboxy-
lation of carboxylic acids have shown great promise in the
field of synthetic chemistry.14 In particular, we have shown
that a broad range of aryl sulfides can be prepared through
decarboxylative C-S cross-coupling.15 Herein, we demon-
strate a novel copper-catalyzed decarboxylative thiolation of
entry catalyst (mol %)
1
base
KF
solvent yield of 3ab (%)
NMP
<5
57
74
88
77
35
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CuI (20)
CuI (4)
CuI (4)
CuI (4)
CuI (4)
CuI (4)
CuI (4)
CuI (4)
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
KHCO3
KF
piperidine NMP
TEA
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
DMSO
DMSO
NMP
PEG
DMF
toluene
dioxane
NMP
(8) (a) Aucagne, V.; Tatibouet, A.; Rollin, P. Tetrahedron 2004, 60,
1817. (b) Stephan, E.; Olaru, A.; Jaouen, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
8571. (c) Silveira, C. C.; Begnini, M. L.; Boeck, P.; Braga, A. L. Synthesis
1997, 221. (d) Ishida, M.; Iwata, T.; Yokoi, M.; Kaga, K.; Kato, S. Synthesis
1985, 632. (e) Mikolajczyk, M.; Grzejszczak, S.; Midura, W.; Zatorski, A.
Synthesis 1975, 278. (f) Kumamoto, T.; Hosoi, K.; Mukaiyam, T. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1968, 41, 2742.
5
77
10
30
5
10 CuI (20)
11 CuI (4)
12 CuI (4)
13 CuI (4)
14 CuCN (4)
15 CuCI (4)
16 CuBr (4)
17 CuCl2 (4)
NMP
NMP
NMP
NMP
NMP
NMP
NMP
NMP
NMP
(9) (a) Cristau, H. J.; Chabaud, B.; Labaudiniere, R.; Christol, H. J.
Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 875. (b) Ogawa, T.; Hayami, K.; Suzuki, H. Chem.
Lett. 1989, 769.
99(96)
85
80
82
35
5
(10) (a) Ranu, B. C.; Chattopadhyay, K.; Banerjee, S. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 423. (b) Boubia, B.; Mioskowski, C.; Manna, S.; Falck, J. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 6023. (c) Wang, L.; Wang, M.; Huang, F. Synlett
2005, 2007. (d) Ichinose, Y.; Wakamatsu, K.; Nozaki, K.; Birbaum, J.-L.;
Oshima, K.; Utimoto, K. Chem. Lett. 1987, 1647. (e) Bates, C. G.; Saejueng,
P.; Doherty, M. Q.; Venkataraman, D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 5005. (f) Kabir,
M. S.; Linn, M. L. V.; Monte, A.; Cook, J. M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3363.
(11) (a) Murahashi, S.-I.; Yamamura, M.; Yanagisawa, K.-I.; Mita, N.;
Kondo, K. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 2408. (b) Wang, Z.; Mo, H.; Bao, W.
Synlett 2007, 91.
18 CuCO3·Cu(OH)2 (4) Cs2CO3
19 Cu(OTf)2 (4) Cs2CO3
a All of the reactions were carried out with phenylpropiolic acid 1a
(0.5 mmol) and 4-methoxybenzenethiol 2a (0.75 mmol) in the presence of
a metal catalyst, NMP (3 mL), and base (1.2 equiv) at 90 °C for 24 h under
air atmosphere. b GC yield. Isolated yield is in parentheses.
40
(12) Kondoh, A.; Takami, K.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 6468.
(13) Wang, Z.-L.; Tang, R.-Y.; Luo, P.-S.; Deng, C.-L.; Zhong, P.; Li,
J.-H. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 10670.
The amount of CuI can be decreased down to 4.0 mol %.
Different bases were screened, and the combination of cesium
carbonate with CuI afforded the best conversion efficiency
(Table 1, entry 13). In contrast to our previously reported
synthesis of aryl sulfides,15 we observe that palladium(II) is
not needed and milder reaction conditions are possible.
Under the optimal reaction conditions, a wide range of thiols
including aromatic, benzylic, and aliphatic thiols were examined
to react with phenylpropiolic acid via decarboxylative cross-
coupling reactions. The results are summarized in Table 2. We
observed that in the presence of the phenylpropiolic acid all
thiols afforded anti-Markovnikov coupling products in good
to excellent yields with high stereoselectivity for Z-isomers. The
arylthiols with electron-rich and electron-deficient aromatic
moieties were effectively converted to the corresponding vinyl
sulfides. Importantly, the decarboxylative coupling reactions are
tolerant of a broad range of functional groups including ethers,
amines, alcohols, halides, and nitrogen-containing heterocycles.
The functional group tolerance should enable further derivati-
zation of the as-synthesized vinyl sulfides (3k,o-s) through
cross-coupling reactions such as Suzuki-Miyaura, Sonogashira,
and Heck reactions.
(14) (a) Myers, A. G.; Tanaka, D.; Mannion, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 11250. (b) Lalic, G.; Aloise, A. D.; Shair, M. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 2852. (c) Trost, B. M.; Xu, J. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 17180. (d) Mohr, J. T.; Behenna, D. C.; Harned, A. M.; Stoltz, B. M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6924. (e) Becht, J.-M.; Catala, C.; Le
Drian, C.; Wagner, A. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1781. (f) Tanaka, D.; Romeril,
S. P.; Myers, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10323. (g) Tanaka, D.;
Myers, A. G. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 433. (h) Goossen, L. J.; Deng, G. J.; Levy,
L. M. Science 2006, 313, 662. (i) Goossen, L. J.; Rodriguez, N.; Melzer,
B.; Linder, C.; Deng, G.; Levy, L. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4824.
(j) Waetzig, S. R.; Tunge, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14860. (k)
Forgione, P.; Brochu, M.-C.; St-Onge, M.; Thesen, K. H.; Bailey, M. D.;
Bilodeau, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11350. (l) Waetzig, S. R.; Tunge,
J. A. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3311. (m) Rayabarapu, D. K.; Tunge, J. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13510. (n) Moon, J.; Jeong, M.; Nam, H.;
Ju, J.; Moon, H. J.; Jung, M. H.; Lee, S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 945. (o) Moon,
J.; Jang, M.; Lee, S. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1403. (p) Yoshino, Y.;
Kurahashi, T.; Matsubara, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7494. (q) Shang,
R.; Fu, Y.; Li, J.-B.; Zhang, S.-L.; Guo, Q.-X.; Liu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 5738. (r) Wang, C.; Piel, I.; Glorius, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 4194. (s) Bi, H.-P.; Zhao, L.; Liang, Y.-M.; Li, C.-J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 792. (t) Shang, R.; Fu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Q.; Yu, H.-Z.;
Liu, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9350. (u) Hu, P.; Kan, J.; Su, W.;
Hong, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2341. (v) Baudoin, O. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2007, 46, 1373. (w) Jia, W.; Jiao, N. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2000. (x)
Luoa, Y.; Wu, J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 3785. (y) Zhang, M.; Zhou, J.;
Kan, J.; Wang, M.; Su, W.; Hong, M. Chem. Commun. 2010, 5455. (z)
Zhou, J.; Hu, P.; Zhang, M.; Huang, S.; Wang, M.; Su, W. Chem.sEur. J.
2010, 16, 5876.
(15) Duan, Z.; Ranjit, S.; Zhang, P.; Liu, X. Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 3666.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 18, 2010
4135