816 R. Gudipati et al.
(DPPH), at the concentration of 0.2 mM in methanol18.
To the 0.1 ml of test compound (at different concentra-
tions), 1.5 ml of methanol and 0.5 ml of DPPH solution
were added, mixed thoroughly and absorbance was read
at 517 nm against blank. e percent reduction of free-
radical concentration (OD) with different concentration
of test compounds was calculated and was compared
with standard ascorbic acid. e results were expressed
as IC50 values (the concentration of test required to scav-
enge 50% free radicals).
N-(Benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)-2-(5-bromo-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)
hydrazinecarboxamide (VI d)
IR υ (cm−1): 3177 (N–H), 1682 (C=O), 1534 (C=N), 1271
(C–N), 1241 (C–O–C); 6.8–6.9(t, 1H, Ar–H), 7.19–7.20
(m, 3H, Ar–H), 7.46–7.48 (d, 1H, Ar–H), 7.61–7.62 (d, 1H,
Ar–H), 7.8 (s, 1H, Ar–H), 11.17 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.33 (s, 1H,
CONH), 11.58 (s, 1H, indole NH); ESI: m/z value 399.0.
N-(Benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)-2-(5-methyl-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)
hydrazinecarboxamide (V e)
IR υ (cm−1): 3198 (N–H), 1696 (C=O), 750 (C=C–H), 1228
1
(C–O–C); H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 6.79–6.96 (m, 5H,
Results and discussion
Ar–H), 7.21–7.22 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 7.36 (s, 1H, Ar–H), 10.07
(s, 1H, CONH), 10.68 (s, 1H, CONH), 10.77 (s, 1H, indole
NH); C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 16.04, 114.66, 117.40,
119.18, 120.41, 122.86, 123.03, 123.71, 125.99, 132.08,
132.70, 134.66, 147.05, 151.14, 152.09, 163.03, 165.07; ESI:
m/z value 335.0.
Chemistry
13
In the present study, 12 different novel novel
3-(2-(benzoxazol-2-yl
carbamoyl)
hydrazono)-2-
oxoindoline derivatives (Va–l) were prepared by treating
N-(benzoxazol-2-yl)hydrazinecarboxamide with differ-
ent isatin derivatives. e preparation of the title deriva-
tives is outlined in Scheme 1. e physical data of the all
synthesized compounds were shown in Table 1. All the
synthesized compounds were purified by column chro-
matography using ethyl acetate, chloroform and metha-
nol as solvent and the reactions were monitored by TLC.
e chemical structures of the synthesized compounds
N-(Benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)-2-(7-chloro-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)
hydrazinecarboxamide (VI i)
IR υ (cm−1): 3255 (N–H), 1732 (C=O), 1690 (C=O), 1502
1
(C=N), 1232 (C–O–C), 1144 (C–N); H NMR (DMSO-d6)
δ ppm: 6.75–6.78 (d, 1H, Ar–H), 7.17–7.20 (d, 1H, Ar–H),
7.34–7.37 (d, 1H, Ar–H), 7.42–7.44 (d, 1H, Ar–H), 7.50–7.52
(t, 1H, Ar–H), 7.60–7.61 (d, 1H, Ar–H), 7.7 (s, 1H, Ar–H),
11.15 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.30 (s, 1H, CONH), 11.51 (s, 1H,
indole NH); ESI: m/z value 355.0.
1
(Table 1) were confirmed by means of their IR, H NMR
and mass spectral analysis.
In vitro anticancer activity
e anticancer activity of all the synthesized compounds
(Va–Vl) was evaluated against HeLa, IMR-32 and MCF-7
cancer cell lines using MTT method and were equally
active against the three cell types tested. e IC50 values of
allthecompoundsincludingtheintermediatewereshown
in Table 2. All the synthesized compounds produced a
dose-dependant inhibition of growth of the cells. e IC50
values of all the synthetic test compounds were found
between 13.71 and 44.61 μM and were less than those
of intermediate and isatin. e IC50 of these compounds
were comparable with known anticancer agent, cisplatin.
Among all the test compounds, compounds Vb–d and Vl
have more potent anticancer activity against three test cell
types. Many anticancer drugs are effective against HeLa,
IMR-32 and MCF-7 cells by causing apoptosis through the
expression of caspase-3, generating reactive oxygen spe-
cies and damaging DNA19. Cisplatin causes cytotoxicity in
MCF-7 and HeLa cells by a similar mechanism20.
e results also indicate that the anticancer activity
of all the synthesized compounds varied with structural
modification. e IC50 value of compound Va (having no
substitution at C5, C7 position) was more than those of
compounds Vb–l, indicating that substitution with dif-
ferent functional groups at C5 and C7 positions results
in the synthesis of potent anticancer activity. Among the
all synthetic compounds, C5-substituted compounds
are more potent than those of C7 substitution. Among
the C5-substituted compounds, compounds having
Biological activities
Evaluation of in vitro anticancer activity against HeLa, IMR-32
and MCF-7 cancer cell lines
In vitro anticancer activity of all the title compounds was
evaluated against HeLa, IMR-32 and MCF-7 cancer cell
lines using MTT assay16,17. e cell suspension of 1×105
cells/ml was prepared in complete growth medium.
Stock solutions of synthetic compounds were prepared in
DMSO. e stock solutions were serially diluted with com-
plete growth medium containing 50mg/ml of gentamycin
to obtain working test solution of required concentrations
(having <1% DMSO). e 100 μl of cell suspension was
added to each well of the 96-well tissue culture plates.
e cells were allowed to grow in CO2 incubator (37°C, 5%
CO2, 90% relative humidity) for 24hr. e test materials in
complete growth medium (100 μl) were added after 24hr
incubation to the wells containing cell suspension. After
48hr of treatment with different concentrations of test
compounds, the cells were incubated with MTT (2.5mg/
ml) for 2hr. e medium was then removed and 100 µl
of DMSO were added into each well to dissolve formazan
crystals, the metabolite of MTT. After thorough mixing,
the plate was read at 490nm for optical density that is
directly correlated with cell quantity.
Evaluation of antioxidant activity
For the evaluation of antioxidant activity, we have used
a stable free-radical α,α-diphenyl-β-picryl hydrazyl
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry