SHPAN’KO et al.
692
tion of the thermodynamically significantly more stable
secondary alcohols.
by TLC on Silufol UV-254 plates (development in iodine
vapor, eluent cyclohexane–dichloromethane, 7:3). The
products of reactions between oxiranes Ie, If and acids
IIb,IIc were synthesized in conditions similar to the
kinetic runs.
EXPERIMENTAL
1H NMR spectra were registered on a spectrometer
Bruker Avance-400 (400 MHz) in CDCl3, internal ref-
erence TMS. Dioxane of “pure for analysis” grade and
diglyme of “pure” grade were dried with KOH and dis-
tilled over Na (diglyme at reduced pressure). Commercial
(Merck) phenyloxirane (98% of the main substance) was
used without additional purification. Technical 4-nitro-
phenyloxirane was twice recrystallized from hexane,
mp 85–86°C [10]. The other aryloxiranes were obtained
from the corresponding phenacyl bromides by known
procedures [11].Arenesulfonic acids of “pure” grade were
dried by long (10 h) boiling of their benzene solutions
with water separation on a Dean–Stark trap and were
stored in a vacuum desiccator over P2O5.
1-(4-Bromo-3-nitrophenyl)-2-tosyloxyethanol
(IVb). A solution of 0.122 g (0.5 mmol) of oxirane Ie
and 0.860 g (5 mmol) of acid IIb in 50 ml of a mixture
of dioxane with diglyme, 1 : 1, was maintained for 72 h
at –8°C till the disappearance of oxirane (TLC monitor-
ing, the absence of reaction with HBr). Then the reaction
mixture was diluted with 100 ml of water, the reaction
product was extracted with ether (3 × 20 ml), the com-
bined ether extracts were washed with water till neutral
reaction of washings, and dried with anhydrous MgSO4,
the solvent was distilled off at a reduced pressure. Yield
1
0.198 g (95%), light yellow oily substance. H NMR
spectrum, δ, ppm: 2.38 s (3H, CH3), 3.54 d.d (1H, CH2,
3J 7.0, 2J 11.2 Hz), 3.62 d.d (1H, CH2, 3J 4.1, 2J 11.2 Hz),
3.86 d.d (1H, CH, 3J1 7.0, 3J 4.1 Hz), 7.33 d (2H, H3,5,
C6H4, J 8.0 Hz), 7.73 d (2H, H2,6 C6H4, J 8.0 Hz), 9.06 d.d
(1H, H6, C6H3, J6,2 2.1, J6,5 9.0 Hz), 9.42 d (1H, H5, C6H3,
J6,5 9.0 Hz), 9.45 d (1H, H2 C6H3, J6,2 2.1 Hz). Found,
%: C 43.45; H 3.28; Br 19.11; N 3.43; S 7.83. C15H-
14BrNO6S. Calculated, %: C 43.27; H 3.36; Br 19.23; N
3.36; S 7.69.
The measurement of the reaction rate was car-
ried out by sampling, the addition to the sample of
HBr solution in glacial acetic acid to stop the pro-
cess. Then the mixture was cooled to 265 K and after
180 min the excess HBr unreacted with residual oxirane
was determined by potentiometric titration with water
solution ofAgNO3 [3]. The reaction kinetics were studied
at 10-fold and over excess of arenesulfonic acids with
respect to the initial concentrations of aryloxiranes (S):
[HA]0 >> [S]0 = 0.001 – 0.008 mol l−1. Under these con-
centration conditions the reaction is of the first order with
respect to oxirane substrate and of the second order with
respect to acid reagent, and the process rate is described
by the equation
1-(3,5-Dinitrophenyl)-2-phenylsulfonyloxy-
ethanol (IVh) was similarly obtained from 0.105 g
(0.5 mmol) of oxirane If and 0.791 g (5 mmol) of
acid IIc. Yield 0.171 g (93%), light yellow oily
1
substance. H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 4.17 d.d
3
2
(1H, CH2, J 6.8, J 10.9 Hz), 4.27 d.d (1H, CH2,
3J 3.9, 2J 10.9 Hz), 5.22 d.d (1H, CH, 3J 3.9, 3J 6.8 Hz),
7.45–7.83 m (5H, Ph), 8.42 d (2H, H2,6, C6H3, J 4.3 Hz),
8.93 t (1H, H4, C6H3, J 4.3 Hz). Found, %: C 45.93;
H 3.19; N 7.79; S 8.53. C14H12N2O8S. Calculated, %:
C 45.65; H 3.26; N 7.61; S 8.69.
–d[S]/dt = k[S] = kXY[S][HA]02,
(6)
where k (s–1) and kXY (l2 mol–2 s–1) are rate constants of
pseudofirst and third order respectively. In all kinetic
runs the apparent rate constants k remained constant in
the course of the process till the conversion of oxirane
was 70–80% (the error in the constant measurement did
not exceed 5%). The constants kXY characterizing the
combined effect of substituents X and Y on the rate of
the process were evaluated by extrapolation to zero of
linear dependences k = kXY[HA]02 for four and more dif-
ferent concentrations of HA (r ≥ 0.995). The statistical
processing of experimental data was performed at the
confidence range 0.95.
REFERENCES
1. Lau, E.Y., Newby, Z.E., and Bruice, T.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2001, vol. 123, p. 3350; Salomatina, O.V., Yarovaya, O.I.,
and Barkhash, V.A., Zh. Org. Khim., 2005, vol. 41, p. 167;
Kas’yan, L.I., Kas’yan, A.O., and Okovityi, S.I., Zh. Org.
Khim., 2006, vol. 42, p. 327; Yudin, A.K., Aziridines and
Epoxides in Organic Synthesis, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH,
2006; Carlier, P.R., Deora, N., and Crawford, T.D., J. Org.
Chem., 2006, vol. 71, p. 1592; Park, S.A., Lim, C.H., and
Chung, K.-H., Bull. Korean, Chem. Soc., 2007, vol. 28,
The homogeneity of compounds obtained was checked
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 47 No. 5 2011