by Porco and Wang in their attempted synthesis of the
tetrapetalone tetracyclic core from the ansamycins.5
To date, there has been no report of a total synthesis of
any member of the tetrapetalone family. Recently, Hong et
al. reported the use of a Speckamp cyclization to build an
early stage tetracyclic core structure.6
Our synthetic analysis of the tetrapetalones was guided
by the desire to effect sequential late-stage oxygenation
chemistry, which would unveil the tetramic acid and para-
quinol moieties from a surrogate pyrrole and phenol,
respectively. In this communication, we report a partial
realization of this synthetic approach, which has led to the
racemic synthesis of an advanced tetracycle en route to the
tetrapetalone A aglycon.
the pyrrole or arene and, as such, presented an untested
extension of the Donohoe dissolving metal reduction chem-
istry. Tetracycle 7 could arise from aryl dienone 8, building
on pentannulation chemistry using the Nazarov cyclization,
which we have previously described.8 The advantage of using
8 as a substrate resided in the chemo-differentiation of the
substituents on the benzene ring, which would positively
impact subsequent functionalization chemistry.
The synthesis commenced with the preparation of aryl
dienone 8 (Scheme 2), which was readily obtained in 88%
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Pyrrole 13
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of the Tetrapetalone Core
a Reagents and conditions: (a) 9 (1.05 equiv), n-butyllithium (1.08 equiv,
2.5 M in hexanes), ether, -78 °C, 5 min, then 10 (1.0 equiv) in THF, -78
°C, 45 min. (b) AlCl3 (1.0 equiv), toluene, rt, 2 h, 9:1 dr. (c) K2CO3 (0.2
equiv), dioxane, 80 °C, 10 h, 4:1 dr. (d) NaBH4 (1.0 equiv), MeOH, 0 °C,
30 min. (e) TBSCl (1.1 equiv), imidazole (1.5 equiv), DMF, 80 °C, 10 h.
(f) t-Buytllithium (2.05 equiv), THF, -78 °C, 5 min, then Ts-N3 (1.2 equiv),
-78 °C to rt, 2 h. (g) LiAlH4 (0.67 equiv), THF, 0 °C, 1 h. (h)
2,5-Dimethoxytetrahydrofuran (1.2 equiv), acetic acid (0.1 equiv), 1,2-
dichloroethane/H2O (4:1), 80 °C, 4 h.
yield from the coupling of the known dibromide 9 and
Weinreb amide 10.9 It was discovered that 8 undergoes
Nazarov cyclization with good regiocontrol (13:1) using
stoichiometric AlCl3 in toluene at room temperature. Pre-
sumably, the major regioisomer is favored because of the
more significant para directing influence of the methoxy
substituent.10 It was necessary to effect epimerization of the
methyl-bearing stereocenter to achieve the trans relationship
of the Me and isopropenyl groups as shown in 11. This was
readily accomplished by heating with K2CO3 in dioxane,
which produced a mixture of diastereomers (4:1 dr) with 11
as the major compound. Reduction of the carbonyl group of
11 and protection of the resulting hydroxyl group with TBSCl
installed a TBS ether. At this stage, a bromide for azide
exchange was accomplished via halogen-metal exchange
followed by addition of tosyl azide to provide 12.11 Of note,
a variety of palladium and copper-mediated C-N bond-
forming reactions failed to accomplish the desired C-N bond
Our retrosynthetic analysis of 1 (Scheme 1) returns the
natural product to tetracycle 6, with the intention of a
concluding stage introduction of the ꢀ-rhodinose fragment
and an oxidative dearomatization of the A ring to install the
para-quinol moiety. We envisioned 6 arising from acylated
pyrrole 7 using a reductive alkylation of the relatively
electron-deficient pyrrole to install the angular ethyl group
at C4. This ambitious alkylation builds on precedent from
Donohoe, who has previously demonstrated the reductive
alkylation of pyrroles bearing carbamate, ester, or amide
groups.7 Although we hoped to accomplish an analogous
transformation in the conversion of 7 to 6, we recognized
that Birch-type reduction of 7 could conceivably reduce either
(5) Porco’s earlier report of an advanced tetracyclic intermediate has
been retracted, see: (a) Wang, X.; Porco, J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 6607. (b) Wang, X.; Porco, J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
3067–3071.
(6) Li, C.; Li, X.; Hong, R. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4036–4039.
(7) For selected examples, see: (a) Donohoe, T. J.; Guyo, P. M.; Beddoes,
R. L.; Helliwell, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 667–676. (b)
Donohoe, T. J.; Ace, K. W.; Guyo, P. M.; Helliwell, M.; McKenna, J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 989–993. (c) Donohoe, T. J.; Harji, R. R.;
Cousins, R. P. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1331–1334. (d) Turner, P. G.;
Donohoe, T. J.; Cousins, R. P. C. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1422–1423. (e)
Donohoe, T. J.; Thomas, R. E. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1888–1895.
(8) Marcus, A. P.; Lee, A. S.; Davis, R. L.; Tantillo, D. J.; Sarpong, R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6379–6383.
(9) Tisserand, S.; Baati, R.; Nicolas, M.; Mioskowski, C. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 8982–8983, For details see, Supporting Information.
(10) Hansch, C.; Leo, A.; Taft, R. W. Chem. ReV. 1991, 91, 165–195.
(11) Matsumoto, T.; Ishida, T.; Koga, N.; Iwamura, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 9952–9959.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 20, 2010
4561