Scheme 2.
Additions of Enantioenriched Allenylsilanes to Tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal and Galactala
a Reaction conditions: TMSOTf (1.0 equiv) was added to a solution of allenylsilane (1.0 equiv) and carbohydrate (1.2 equiv) in MeCN (0.5 M) at -40
b
1
°C and stirred for 1 h. Isolated yields after chromatographic purification. Diastereomeric ratios determined by H NMR analysis of crude material.
R-face.4 When chiral crotylsilane reagents were used, a double
stereodifferentiation was observed, wherein the stereochemistry
of the silane nucleophile affected the diastereomeric ratio of
the C-glycosidation products (Scheme 1).5
relative and absolute stereochemistry of the products was
assigned by analogy to known products.9
Achiral allenylsilanes 4a-4c were prepared using a
Fleming SN2′ displacement of the appropriate propargyl
mesylate,10 while 4d was obtained by a Johnson orthoester
Claisen rearrangement.6g These achiral allenylsilanes under-
went C-glycosidation with tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal, giving the
desired dihydropyrans in moderate to high yield (Table 1).
Recently, allenylsilanes have reemerged as an important class
of carbon nucleophiles. These allenes have demonstrated their
versatility in nucleophilic additions to oxonium and iminum
ions, leading to the stereospecific formation of functionalized
alkynes.6 Despite the recent advances exploring the synthesis
and reactivity of allenylsilanes, there are no reports of these
nucleophiles (or similar allenylmetal reagents) in C-glycosida-
tion reactions. Herein we report an efficient and highly
stereoselective C-glycosidation of glycals with allenylsilanes,
forming glycosides containing an internal alkyne.7
Table 1. Additions of Achiral Allenylsilanes to
Tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal
We have recently reported the multigram synthesis of both
enantiomers of allenylsilane 1.6d The C-glycosidations of tri-
O-acetyl-D-glucal with allenylsilanes (Ra)-1 and (Sa)-1, mediated
by TMSOTf in MeCN,8 gave the desired R-C-glycoside
products in good yields as single diastereomers (Scheme 2).
Both the (Ra) and (Sa) enantiomers display exceptional face
selectivity, as the axial chirality of the allene overrides the
inherent chirality of the glycal. In other words, the “matched”
or “mismatched” reaction partners, which were observed with
chiral crotylsilanes, were not observed with the allenes.5 The
relative and absolute stereochemistry of the products was
assigned based on comparison to known products, confirming
the expected R-addition to the carbohydrate.9
Enantioenriched allenylsilanes 1 also underwent C-gly-
cosidation reactions with tri-O-acetyl-D-galactal, providing
the diastereomeric dihydropyran products in slightly lower
yield than the analogous glucal additions (Scheme 2). As
before, the products were formed as a single observed
diastereomer, with both allene enantiomers exibiting similar
levels of diastereoselectivity. However, it is interesting to
note that the Sa-enantiomer provided lower yields in both
additions, so it is possible that the mismatched reaction
partners are less reactive than the matched counterparts. The
allene
R
yielda
drb
product
4a
4b
4c
4d
Me
Et
Ph
93
88
54
65
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
5a
5b
5c
5d
CH2CO2Me
a Isolated yield after chromatographic purification. b Diastereomeric ratios
determined by H NMR analysis of crude material.
1
The products of these reactions were again formed as a single
diastereoisomer, with preferential addition to the R-face.
Achiral allenylsilanes 4a-4d also provided the desired
C-glycosidation adducts when added to tri-O-acetyl-D-
galactal in the presence of TMSOTf (Table 2). The galactal-
derived products were isolated in slightly lower yields than
(5) Panek, J. S.; Schaus, J. V. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 10971–10982.
(6) (a) Danheiser, R. L.; Carini, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3927–
3929. (b) Danheiser, R. L.; Carini, D. J.; Kwasigroch, C. A. J. Org. Chem.
1986, 51, 3870–3878. (c) Marshall, J. A.; Maxson, K. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 630–633. (d) Brawn, R. A.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2689–
2692. (e) Felzmann, W.; Castagnolo, G.; Rosenbeiger, D.; Mulzer, J. J.
Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2182–2186. (f) Brawn, R. A.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 4362–4365. (g) Brawn, R. A.; Welzel, M.; Lowe, J. T.; Panek,
J. S. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 336–339. (h) Marchart, S.; Gromov, A.; Mulzer,
J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2050–2053.
(4) (a) Danishefsky, S. J.; Kerwin, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 3803–
3805. (b) Danishefksy, S. J.; Armistead, D. M.; Wincott, F. E.; Selnick,
H. G.; Hungate, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 8117–8119.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 20, 2010
4625