C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2
absorption for the open forms can be assigned as the π f π*
transition from the π orbital localized in the dithienylthiophene unit
to the π* orbital localized in the thienyl-containing ꢀ-diketone
(enol)/ꢀ-diketonate core, while that for the closed forms is the π
f π* transition from the π orbital localized on the condensed ring
of the dithienylthiophene unit to the π* orbital delocalized over
the whole 3ThacacH/3Thacac moiety.
In conclusion, a versatile dithienylethene-containing ꢀ-diketonate
ligand and its boron(III) compounds have been synthesized, and their
photophysical and photochromic properties have been studied. The
incorporation of boron(III) has been demonstrated to shift the photo-
chromic behavior to the NIR region, with a pronounced red shift in
the absorption maxima upon photocyclization. This facile modulation
may provide new insights into the future design of NIR photochromic
materials. Further investigations of the inclusion of this ligand at other
transition-metal and lanthanide centers are in progress.
observed at λ e 750 nm.11 These results suggest that a pronounced
perturbation of the dithienylethene ligand is achieved by incorpora-
tion of the boron(III) center. Moreover, the luminescence quantum
yields of 3ThacacBF2 and 3ThacacB(C6F5)2 were found to be
reduced by over 90% to 0.012 and 0.008, respectively. On the other
hand, 3ThacacBPh2 showed no photochromic behavior, with only
photodegradation after prolonged UV irradiation.
Acknowledgment. V.W.-W.Y. acknowledges support from The
University of Hong Kong under the Distinguished Research
Achievement Award Scheme and the URC Strategic Research
Theme on Molecular Materials. This work was supported by the
University Grants Committee Areas of Excellence Scheme (AoE/
P-03/08). C.-T.P. acknowledges the receipt of a postgraduate
studentship from The University of Hong Kong. We also thank
the Computer Center at The University of Hong Kong for providing
computational resources, which were supported by a Hong Kong
UGC Special Equipment Grant (SEG HKU09).
Figure 1. (a) UV-vis absorption and (b) normalized emission spectral
changes of 3ThacacBF2, and (c) UV-vis absorption and (d) normalized
emission spectral changes of 3ThacacB(C6F5)2 in benzene (5 × 10-5 M)
upon UV excitation at 298 K.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures, charac-
terization data, photophysical data, electrochemical data, cycloreversibility
and thermal stability studies, and computational details. This material is
The quantum yields for both the photocyclization and photocyclo-
reversion processes were determined (Table S4). The φOfC(390) value
for 3ThacacH was found to be 0.2, while after incorporation of boron,
φOfC(390) improved to ca. 0.4. The φCfO(509) value for 3ThacacH was
found to be 0.0019, whereas the φCfO(509) values for the boron(III)
compounds were found to be 0.0004-0.0005. Furthermore, both
3ThacacH (Figure S4) and 3ThacacBF2 (Figure S5) showed good
cycloreversibility, as they did not lose their photochromic properties
over five repeating cycles. Photocycloreversion could also be achieved
upon irradiation at 650 nm (Figure S6). In addition, the closed forms
of 3ThacacH and 3ThacacBF2 were found to undergo slow thermal
backward reactions. The half-life for the closed form of 3ThacacH,
which was estimated from the absorption decay, was found to be 1376
min at 328 K and 65525 min at 298 K, while that of 3ThacacBF2
was found to be 598 min at 328 K and 8455 min at 298 K. A slightly
lower activation energy for thermal cycloreversion of 3ThacacBF2
(Ea ) 103.3 kJ mol-1) than of 3ThacacH (Ea ) 106.7 kJ mol-1) was
observed (Figures S7-S10).
Density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-
DFT) calculations were performed to gain deeper insight into the
structural geometries and nature of the low-energy absorptions for
the open and closed forms of this class of compounds. Although
the closed form of 3ThacacBPh2 cannot be obtained from experi-
ment, calculations were also performed to predict its properties (see
the SI). The first singlet-singlet transitions for the open and closed
forms, respectively, were computed to be at 371 and 691 nm for
3ThacacH (the most stable enol tautomer), 421 and 809 nm for
3ThacacBF2, 436 and 858 nm for 3ThacacB(C6F5)2, and 414 and
788 nm for 3ThacacBPh2, and these mainly correspond to
excitation from the HOMO to the LUMO (see Tables S8 and S9).
It is noted that the HOMO and LUMO of the two forms in the free
ligand are very similar to those of the boron compounds. On the
basis of the topologies of the HOMO and LUMO, the lowest-energy
References
(1) Molecular Switches; Feringa, B. L., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany,
1990.
(2) (a) Irie, M. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1685. (b) Tian, H.; Yang, S. Chem.
Soc. ReV. 2004, 33, 85.
(3) (a) Ko, C.-C.; Yam, V. W.-W. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 2063. (b) Hasegawa,
Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Kawai, T. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2010, 254, 2643.
(4) (a) Ferna´ndez-Acebes, A.; Lehn, J.-M. AdV. Mater. 1998, 10, 1519. (b)
Murguly, E.; Norsten, T. B.; Branda, N. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 1752. (c) Yam, V. W.-W.; Ko, C.-C.; Zhu, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 12734. (d) Lee, P. H.-M.; Ko, C.-C.; Zhu, N.; Yam, V. W.-W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6058. (e) Yam, V. W.-W.; Lee, J. K.-W.; Ko, C.-
C.; Zhu, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 912.
(5) Vigato, P. A.; Peruzzo, V.; Tamburini, S. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2009, 253, 1099.
(6) (a) Cogne´-Laage, E.; Allemand, J.-F.; Ruel, O.; Baudin, J.-B.; Croquette,
V.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Jullien, L. Chem.sEur. J. 2004, 10, 1445. (b)
Zhang, G.; Chen, J.; Payne, S. J.; Kooi, S. E.; Demas, J. N.; Fraser, C. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8942. (c) Nagai, A.; Kokado, K.; Nagata,
Y.; Arita, M.; Chujo, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8605. (d) Macedo, F. P.;
Gwengo, C.; Lindeman, S. V.; Smith, M. D.; Gardinier, J. R. Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem. 2008, 3200. (e) Zhang, G.; Palmer, G. M.; Dewhirst, M. W.; Fraser,
C. L. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 747. (f) Zhang, G.; Lu, J.; Sabat, M.; Fraser,
C. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2160.
(7) (a) Yamaguchi, S.; Wakamiya, A. Pure Appl. Chem. 2006, 78, 1413. (b)
Wakamiya, A.; Taniguchi, T.; Yamaguchi, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 834.
(8) (a) Ja¨kle, F. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2006, 250, 1107. (b) Wase, C. R.;
Broomsgrove, A. E. J.; Aldridge, S.; Gabba¨ı, F. P. Chem. ReV. 2010, 110,
3958.
(9) (a) Zhou, Z.; Xiao, S.; Xu, J.; Liu, Z.; Shi, M.; Li, F.; Yi, T.; Huang, C.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3911. (b) Lemieux, V.; Spantulescu, M. D.; Baldridge,
K. K.; Branda, N. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5034. (c) Rao,
Y.-L.; Amarne, H.; Zhao, S.-B.; McCormick, T. M.; Martic´, S.; Sun, Y.;
Wang, R.-Y.; Wang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12898.
(10) Tsujioka, T.; Kume, M.; Irie, M. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 35, 4353.
(11) (a) Gilat, S. L.; Kawai, S. H.; Lehn, J.-M. Chem.sEur. J. 1995, 1, 275.
(b) Chen, B. Z.; Wang, M. Z.; Wu, Y. Q.; Tian, H. Chem. Commun. 2002,
1060. (c) Tian, H.; Chen, B. Z.; Tu, H.; Mu¨llen, K. AdV. Mater. 2002, 14,
918. (d) Odo, Y.; Matsuda, K.; Irie, M. Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 4283.
(12) Yun, C.; You, J.; Kim, J.; Huh, J.; Kim, E. J. Photochem. Photobiol., C
2009, 10, 111.
JA105537J
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 40, 2010 13993