T. Agou et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 5013–5015
5015
tor, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (Fax: +44 1223
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. (a) Entwistle, C. D.; Marder, T. B. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4574; (b) Yamaguchi,
S.; Tamao, K. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 2.
2. (a) Yamaguchi, S.; Akiyama, S.; Tamao, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11372; (b)
Sundararaman, K.; Venkatasubbaiah, K.; Victor, M.; Zakharov, L. N.; Rheingold,
A. L.; Jäkle, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16554; (c) Zhou, G.; Baumgarten, M.;
Müllen, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12477; (d) Day, J. K.; Bresner, C.; Coombs,
N. D.; Fallis, I. A.; Ooi, L.-L.; Aldridge, S. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 793; (e) Agou, T.;
Sekine, M.; Kobayashi, J.; Kawashima, T. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1894; (f) Agou,
T.; Sekine, M.; Kobayashi, J.; Kawashima, T. J. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 694,
3833.
3. (a) Chen, J.; Kampf, J. W.; Ashe, A. J., III Organometallics 2008, 27, 3639; (b) Chai,
J.; Wang, C.; Jia, L.; Pang, Y.; Graham, M.; Cheng, S. Z. D. Synth. Met. 2009, 159,
1443; (c) Akutsu, H.; Kozawa, K.; Uchida, T. Synth. Met. 1995, 70, 1109.
4. (a) Metz, M. V.; Schwartz, D. J.; Stern, C. L.; Nickias, P. N.; Marks, T. J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1312; (b) Metz, M. V.; Schwartz, D. J.; Stern, C. L.;
Marks, T. J. Organometallics 2002, 21, 4159; (c) Williams, V. C.; Dai, C.; Li, Z.;
Collins, S.; Piers, W. E.; Clegg, W.; Elsegood, M. R. J.; Marder, T. B. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3695.
5. Lorbach, A.; Bolte, M.; Li, H.; Lerner, H.-W.; Holthausen, M. C.; Jäkle, F.; Wagner,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4584.
6. Lorbach, A.; Bolte, M.; Lerner, H.-W.; Wagner, M. Chem. Commun. 2010, 3592.
7. (a) Müller, P.; Pritzkow, H.; Siebert, W. J. Organomet. Chem. 1996, 524, 41; (b)
Müller, P.; Gangnus, B.; Pritzkow, H.; Schulz, H.; Stephan, M.; Siebert, W. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1995, 487, 235.
Figure 4. UV–vis and fluorescence spectral change of 3 ([3] = 5.2 ꢁ 10ꢀ5 M) upon
addition of (n-Bu)4NF in THF at 298 K. (a) UV–vis spectra. (b) Fluorescence spectra.
The X marks indicate scattered excitation light (348 nm).
8. (a) Bieller, S.; Zhang, F.; Bolte, M.; Bats, J. W.; Lerner, H.-W.; Wagner, M.
Organometallics 2004, 23, 2107; (b) Müller, P.; Huck, S.; Köppel, H.; Pritzkow,
H.; Siebert, W. Z. Naturforsch. B 1995, 50, 1476; (c) Eisch, J. J.; Kotowicz, B. W.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 761.
9. Compound 3 was synthesized by a different method. See Ref. 7b.
10. Sheldrick, G. M. SHELX-97, Program for the Solution of Crystal Structure; University
of Göttingen, 1997.
rescence intensity did not change very much. Therefore, the fluo-
rescence quantum yield itself should improve by the formation
of [3-F]ꢀ. In fact, the quantum yield was estimated to be 0.15,
when 1 equiv of fluoride ion was added.18 Interestingly, addition
of excess fluoride ion enhanced the emission intensity (Fig. 4b,
middle), and the fluorescence quantum yield reached 0.24 or
0.37 upon addition of 1.4 equiv or 2.0 equiv of fluoride ion, respec-
tively. Because the formation of [3-F]ꢀ was completed by addition
of 1 equiv of fluoride ion, the emission enhancement should not
originate from the progress of the formation of [3-F]ꢀ. The origin
of this strange behavior is still unclear.
In conclusion, the stepwise synthetic route to the 9,10-dihydro-
9,10-diboraanthracene was developed. This method can be utilized
for the synthesis of 9,10-dihydro-9,10-diboraanthracene deriva-
tives bearing acid-sensitive functional groups. The 9,10-dihydro-
9,10-diboraanthracene has a planar structure, and the central dibo-
rin ring is classified as a non-aromatic system on the basis of crystal-
lographic analysis and GIAO calculations. UV–vis and fluorescence
spectroscopy as well as theoretical calculations revealed that unique
photo-physical characteristics of the 9,10-dihydro-9,10-diboraan-
thracene, and electrochemical measurement showed the enhanced
electron-accepting property of this compound. The 9,10-dihydro-
9,10-diboraanthracene formed complexes with fluoride ions, result-
ing in the change of the absorption and fluorescence.
11. Zettler, F.; Hausen, H. D.; Hess, H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1974, 72, 157.
12. DFT calculations at B3LYP level of theory were performed on model
compounds 30 and [30-F]ꢀ bearing 2,6-dimethylphenyl groups instead of
mesityl groups in real molecules 3 and [3-F]ꢀ using GAUSSIAN 03 program
package, and 6-31G(d) and 6-31G+(d) level of theory were employed for
geometry optimization and single point calculations, respectively. Frisch, M. J.;
Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.;
Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.;
Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega,
N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.;
Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.;
Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo,
J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli,
C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.;
Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.;
Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz,
J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-
Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. GAUSSIAN 03,
Revision C.02; Gaussian: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
13. Wakamiya, A.; Mori, K.; Araki, T.; Yamaguchi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
10850.
14. 9,10-Dihydro-9,10-diboraanthracene derivatives bearing smaller substituents
on the boron atoms were reported to form complexes with THF, resulting in
blue-shift of the absorption maxima unlike 3. See Ref. 3b.
15. HOMO, HOMO-1, HOMO-2, and HOMO-3 of 3 were mixtures of occupied
orbitals of the mesityl groups, and the highest occupied -orbital on the 9,10-
dihydro-9,10-diboraanthracene skeleton was found as HOMO-4. On the other
p-
Acknowledgments
p
*
This work was partially supported by Grants-in-Aid for the Glo-
bal COE Program (Chemistry Innovation through Cooperation of
Science and Engineering) and for the Scientific Researches from
MEXT and JSPS. We also thank Tosoh Finechem Corp. for the gen-
erous gifts of alkyllithiums.
hand, LUMO and LUMO+1 of
diboraanthracene formed by the mixing of 2p (B) orbitals and
the benzene rings. See the Supplementary data for detail.
3
were
p
orbitals of 9,10-dihydro-9,10-
*
*
p orbitals of
16. Because the complexation constant was too large, the estimation quality was
not good.
17. The reactioin of 3 and excess amount of (n-Bu)4NF (6 equiv) in THF-d8 seemed
to afford only monofluoroborate [3-F]ꢀ, judging from 1H NMR spectrum, even
at low temperature (193 K). However, negative-mode FAB-MS of this mixture
showed ion peaks at m/z 693 and 451 that correspond to (n-Bu4N)+ or H+
adduct of difluoroborate [3ꢀ2F]2ꢀ, respectively. The presence of the isosbestic
point in the reaction of [3-F]ꢀ and more than 1 equiv of fluoride ion further
indicates the formation of the difluoroborate. If the formation of the
difluoroborate is supposed, its formation constant was calculated to be
Supplementary data
Syntheses and characterization data of 2 and 3; optimized
geometry and plots of molecular orbitals of 30 and [3-F]ꢀ. Crystal-
lographic data for the structural analysis have been deposited with
the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (CCDC-774409). Copy
of this information can be obtained free of charge from The Direc-
K = 1.4(8) ꢁ 106 Mꢀ1
.
18. The fluorescence quantum yields after the complexation were estimated by a
comparative method based on the absolute value for 3 in THF (0.05).