2712
M. Özçeßsmeci et al. / Polyhedron 29 (2010) 2710–2715
The crude product was precipitated and filtered off, washed with
hot water and then with cold methanol, and dried in vacuo. Finally,
purification of the product was accomplished by column chroma-
tography on silica gel, first with chloroform/ethyl acetate (1:4)
and then with acetone/toluene (1:2) as the eluent.
eluent. As expected for monosubstituted phthalonitriles, the Pcs
2–4 are a mixture of four structural isomers and our attempts to
isolate each of them have been unsuccessful [37]. All the new com-
pounds were identified through various spectroscopic techniques,
such as 1H NMR, 13C NMR, 19F NMR, FT-IR, UV–Vis, ESI-MS and
elemental analysis. Spectroscopic data of the compounds 1–4 are
in full agreement with the proposed structures.
2.2.1. Compound 2
IR spectrum of 1 indicated C„N groups by the presence of an
intense band at 2227 cmꢀ1, and also benzylic groups at 2964–
2855 cmꢀ1 and etheric (C–O–C) units at 1255 cmꢀ1. Phthalocya-
nines 2–4 also have very similar IR absorptions for the peripheral
substituents; the clear difference is the disappearance of the sharp
C„N band at 2227 cmꢀ1, which signifies the cyclotetramerization
of the dinitrile.
Yield: 0.086 g (28%). M.p. >200 °C. Elemental analysis, Anal.
Calc. for C116H48F40N8O12Zn: C, 54.19; H, 1.88; N, 4.36. Found: C,
54.31; H, 1.92; N, 4.48%. IR
m
max/cmꢀ1: 2925–2854 (alkyl CH),
1287 (C–O–C). 1H NMR (CDCl3), (d, ppm): 7.74 (m, 4H, Ar-H),
7.50 (d, 4H, Ar-H), 7.35 (s, 4H, Ar-H), 6.67 (s, 8H, Ar-H), 6.56 (s,
4H, Ar-H), 5.10 (d, 24H, CH2). 19F NMR (CDCl3), (d, ppm): ꢀ142.6
(d(d), 16F, o-fluorine), ꢀ152.4 (t, 8F, p-fluorine), ꢀ161.8 (m, 16F,
In the 1H NMR spectrum of 1, the aromatic protons appear at d
7.73, 7.26, 7.22, 6.65 and 6.56 ppm as a doublet, doublet, singlet,
singlet and singlet, respectively. Also the CH2 protons of the penta-
fluorobenzyl and benzyl moieties were observed at 5.11 ppm. The
1H NMR spectra of 2 and 3 were almost identical to those of the
m-fluorine). UV–Vis (CHCl3): kmax/nm (log
(4.99). MS (MALDI TOF) m/z: 2571.48 [M]+.
e): 343 (5.00), 678
2.2.2. Compound 3
Yield: 0.070 g (23%). M.p. >200 °C. Elemental analysis, Anal. Calc.
starting compound
broadening.
1 except for small shifts and a slight
for C116H48F40N8O12Ni: C, 54.33; H, 1.89; N, 4.37. Found: C, 54.47;
H, 1.95; N, 4.21%. IR m
max/cmꢀ1: 2924–2854 (alkyl CH), 1287 (C–O–
The 13C NMR spectrum of 1 showed aromatic carbon atoms at d
161.69–102.39 ppm and aliphatic carbon atoms appeared at d 70.75
and 57.88 ppm. Also the nitrile carbons were observed at d 115.69
and 115.34 ppm. The 13C NMR spectrum of the NiPc (3) was fully
consistent with the proposed structure.
C). 1H NMR (CDCl3), (d, ppm): 7.73 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.54 (m, 4H,
Ar-H), 7.35 (s, 4H, Ar-H), 6.83 (s, 8H, Ar-H), 6.51 (s, 4H, Ar-H), 5.05
(s, 24H, CH2). 13C NMR (CDCl3), (d, ppm): 170.73 (aromatic C), 158.63
(aromatic C–O), 158.32 (aromatic C–O), 155.16 (aromatic C–O),
145.72 (aromatic C–F), 143.72 (aromatic C), 141.64 (aromatic
C–F), 141.64 (aromatic C–F), 137.55 (aromatic C–F), 135.55 (aromatic
C–H), 131.21 (aromatic C–H), 129.84 (aromatic C–H), 127.80
(aromatic C), 116.68 (aromatic C–H), 109.01 (aromatic C), 105.76
(aromatic C–H), 100.53 (aromatic C–H), 70.10 (OCH2), 56.47
The 19F NMR spectra are much simpler to interpret as they usu-
ally contain only a limited number of signals. Therefore, 19F NMR
spectroscopy could become a simple and efficient way to identify
fluorine atoms of phenyl substituents. The 19F NMR spectra of 1
(Fig. 1) and 2 showed the expected signals of the five fluorine
atoms attached to the aromatic ring. Integration of the peaks gave
a 2:1:2 ratio as expected. These compounds displayed signals due
to F2,6 (o-fluorine), F4 (p-fluorine) and F3,5 (m-fluorine) at d ꢀ144.8,
ꢀ154.6 and ꢀ163.8 ppm for compound 1 and ꢀ142.6, ꢀ152.4 and
ꢀ161.8 ppm for compound 2, respectively. The F4 signals appeared
as a triplet due to F3,5 coupling, the F2,6 signals appeared as a dou-
blet of doublets and the F3,5 signals as a multiplet in both
compounds.
In addition to these supportive results for the structures, the
mass spectra of compounds 1–3 gave the characteristic molecular
ion peaks at m/z: 626.50 [M]+, 2571.48 [M]+, 2564.78 [M]+ and 4
gave a monoprotonated molecular ion peak at m/z: 2565.85
[M+H]+, confirming the proposed structures.
The UV–Vis spectra of the phthalocyanine complexes (2–4)
exhibited characteristic absorptions in the Q-band region at
around 678, 668 and 669 nm for MPcs (2–4) in chloroform, attrib-
(OCH2). UV–Vis (CHCl3): kmax/nm (log
e): 323 (5.06), 668 (5.07). MS
(ESI+), (m/z): 2564.78 [M]+.
2.2.3. Compound 4
Yield: 0.104 g (34%). M.p. >200 °C. Elemental analysis, Anal.
Calc. for C116H48F40N8O12Co: C, 54.33; H, 1.87; N, 4.37. Found: C,
54.52; H, 1.97; N, 4.49%. IR:
m
max/cmꢀ1: 2925–2854 (alkyl CH),
1284 (C–O–C). UV–Vis (CHCl3): kmax/nm (log
e): 317 (5.04), 669
(4.94). MS (ESI+), (m/z): 2565.85 [M+H]+.
3. Results and discussion
Zinc(II), nickel(II) and cobalt(II) phthalocyanines carrying four
branched groups at peripheral positions were prepared according
to the route shown in Scheme 1. The first step in the synthetic pro-
cedure was to obtain the phthalonitrile derivative (1) containing
3,5-bis(20,30,40,50,60-pentafluorobenzyloxy)benzyloxy groups. This
was accomplished by a base-catalyzed nucleophilic aromatic nitro
displacement of 4-nitrophthalonitrile [34] with 3,5-bis(20,30,40,
50,60-pentafluorobenzyloxy)benzyl alcohol [35]. This reaction has
been used effectively in the preparation of a variety of ether- or
thioether-substituted phthalonitriles. The nucleophilic substitu-
tion of 3,5-bis(20,30,40,50,60-pentafluorobenzyloxy) benzyl alcohol
with 4-nitrophthalonitrile in N,N-dimethylformamide using potas-
sium carbonate as the base at room temperature for 24 h under N2
atmosphere gave compound 1 in about 54% yield. The product was
purified by column chromatography.
The substituted phthalonitrile derivative 1 was used to prepare
zinc(II), nickel(II) and cobalt(II) phthalocyanine complexes (2–4)
by its reaction with zinc(II) acetate, nickel(II) chloride or cobalt(II)
chloride in DMF at 140 °C in a sealed tube. The green products
were extremely soluble in various solvents, such as chloroform,
dichloromethane, tetrahydrofuran, and acetone, and they were
purified by column chromatography on silica gel, first with chloro-
form/ethyl acetate (1:4) and then with acetone/toluene (1:2) as the
uted to the
p–p* transition from the HOMO (highest occupied
molecular orbital) to the LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital) of the Pcꢀ2 ring, and in the B band region (UV region) at
around 317–343 nm in chloroform, arising from the deeper
transitions (Fig. 2).
p–p*
The aggregation behavior of phthalocyanines in solution, which
can be followed effectively by absorption studies, is a good indica-
tion of the interactions between the aromatic macrocycles of the
phthalocyanines. Aggregation, which is usually depicted as a copla-
nar association, is dependent on the concentration, nature of the
solvent, nature of the substituents, complexed metal ions and tem-
perature [38–40].
In this study, the aggregation behavior of 2 was investigated at
different concentrations in chloroform (Fig. 3). In chloroform, as
the concentration was increased, the intensity of the Q-band
absorption increased in parallel, and there were no new bands
due to the aggregated species [41]. It is seen that the Beer–Lambert
law was obeyed for compound 2 for concentrations ranging from
1 ꢁ 10ꢀ5 to 1 ꢁ 10ꢀ6 mol dmꢀ3 (insert in Fig. 3).