C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
[L]CosN(H)tBu to [L]CodNtBu (L ) phenyltris(1-tert-butyl-
imidazol-2-ylidene)borato).3a The reaction of 3 with SMesO•
generated the Ni(II) imide (dtbpe)NidN(dmp) (4, Scheme 1)
under mild conditions (ambient temperature, 12 h) and in high
yield (90%). The same reactivity was observed for (dtbpe)Nis
NHAr.10 1H, 31P, and 13C NMR spectra of 4 confirmed the presence
of a pseudo-C2V symmetric complex in solution, with magnetically
equivalent phosphorus nuclei (31P δ 119.23). The solid-state
structure of 4, determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure
1), revealed a trigonal-planar geometry at the metal center with
the sum of angles around Ni at 359.31°. The Ni-N bond deviates
from the P(1)-Ni-P(2) bisector by ∼9°, and the Ni-N distance
of 1.697(2) Å is, within error, equal to the distance found for other
Ni(II) aryl imides.4,11 The Ni-N-C(31) angle at 168.98(12)°
deviates slightly from linearity, with the complex (dtbpe)NidNMes
being the only imide with collinear Ni, N, and C atoms.11 Steric
requirements of the dmp substituent force its central aryl ring to
lie perpendicular to the Ni coordination plane, in contrast to the
coplanar geometry found in other arylimides in this (dtbpe)Ni
system.4,11
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammogram for (dtbpe)Ni-NH(dmp) (3) at 100 mV/s,
10 mM in 1 M [nBu4N]PF6 in THF, Cp2Fe/Cp2Fe+ corrected.
Next, we probed the feasibility of pathway B. As mentioned, 4
can be independently synthesized from 3 by [Cp2Fe]+ oxidation to
give the cationic Ni(II) complex [(dtbpe)NisNH(dmp][B(ArF)4] (6),
followed by deprotonation using NaN(SiMe3)2. Based on the Ni(I)/
Ni(II) redox potential (E1/2 ) -0.55 V; Figure 3) and E(SMesOH/
SMesO•) ) -0.5 V,14 it is uncertain, however, whether SMesO• is
thermodynamically competent to oxidize 3. We also explored the
We also became interested in studying the analogous hydrogen-
abstraction process with the nickel phosphide complex 1 since no
such syntheses have been reported for phosphinidenes. The prepara-
tion of such complexes usually employs halogen abstrac-
tion,12a,b hydrogen-atom migration,12c-e methatesis,12f or dehy-
drohalogenation,13 in addition to the oxidation/deprotonation pro-
S
second step, deprotonation, by employing MesOK as a base to
1
convert 6 to 4. By monitoring this reaction by H NMR spectros-
copy, the reduction of 6 to 3 was observed initially and not its
deprotonation, a fact that seems to invalidate this mechanistic
pathway. Therefore, we propose that the transformations of 1/3 to
S
2/4 in the presence of MesO• occur by PCET (path C, Figure 2).
5
S
tocol detailed above. Reaction of MesO• with 1 led to 2 in 75%
isolated yield (Scheme 1). Interestingly, the phosphinidene (2)
and imide (4) complexes can be reconverted to the corresponding
Ni(I) phosphide (1) and amide (3) compounds in 87% and 75%
yield, respectively, by reaction with the H• donor nBu3SnH
(Scheme 1).
This proposal is in agreement with the PCET mechanism proposed
by Smith for the conversion of [L]CosN(H)tBu to [L]CodNtBu.3a
DFT calculations are consistent with the experimental data. DFT
calculations also support C as a viable, low-barrier mechanism since
the calculated reaction energies are -9.2/4.0 kcal/mol for the
conversion of 1/3 to 2/4 (Figure 2). The formation of the anionic
intermediate 5 and the cationic complex 6 are both energetically
uphill (103.0 and 22.3 kcal/mol, Figure 2), and the base and oxidant
energetics are included in the thermodynamic analysis.
In conclusion, we have described two examples of hydrogen-
atom abstraction from nickel phosphide and amide complexes to
form the corresponding phosphinidene and imide derivatives. These
processes were enabled by the synthesis of the dmp-substituted
imide and phosphinidene complexes, and their mechanism was
discussed on the basis of experimental and computational results.
In both cases, proton-coupled-electron transfer was found to be the
most viable reaction pathway. These transformations open an
avenue for the synthesis of late-transition-metal-element multiply
bonded species and contribute to the understanding of hydrogen-
atom abstraction processes in metal complexes.
Figure 2. Possible reaction pathways and calculated energies (kcal/mol;
solvent-corrected for benzene) for the conversion of 1 to 2 (X ) P) and 3
to 4 (X ) N); the organic reactants and products were omitted for clarity.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Science Foundation through Grant CHE-0957816 to G.L.H.
Supporting Information Available: Crystallographic data for 3 and
4 (CIF). Synthetic and spectroscopic characterization of all complexes
and computational details (PDF). This material is available free of
The conversion of 1/3 to 2/4 by SMesO• may follow three
pathways (Figure 2): (A) deprotonation (PT ) proton transfer)
followed by oxidation (ET ) electron transfer), (B) oxidation
followed by deprotonation, and (C) proton-coupled-electron transfer
(PCET). We disfavor path A since all our attempts to isolate the
anionic species [(dtbpe)NidN(dmp)-] (5) from the reduction of 4
led to decomposition, indicating that 5 is not stable. This observation
is supported by DFT calculations that show that the conversion of
2/4 to 7/5 is highly endothermic (101.0/99.0 kcal/mol, Figure 2).
References
(1) Mukhopadhyay, S.; Mandal, S. K.; Bhaduri, S.; Armstrong, W. H. Chem.
ReV. 2004, 104, 3981.
(2) (a) Kogut, E.; Wiencko, H. L.; Zhang, L.; Cordeau, D. E.; Warren, T. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11248. (b) Eckert, N. A.; Vaddadi, S.; Stoian,
S.; Lachicotte, R. J.; Cundari, T. R.; Holland, P. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 6868.
n
In addition, 3 is inert toward either BuLi or (Me3Si)2NNa, bases
stronger than SMesO• (for SMesOH•+: pKa ≈ 3),13 further supporting
that A is not a viable pathway in the transformation of 3 to 4
(3) (a) Cowley, R. E.; Bontchev, R. P.; Sorrell, J.; Sarracino, O.; Feng, Y.;
Wang, H.; Smith, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129 (9), 2424. (b) Huynh,
M. H. V.; Meyer, T. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 13138.
(4) Mindiola, D. J.; Hillhouse, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4623.
S
mediated by MesO•.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 43, 2010 15149