periphery due to steric congestion between the proximal
C-H bonds. This doubly concave conformation can thus
provide unique opportunities for complexation with geo-
metrically complementary compounds, such as C60.4
out a double Corey-Fuchs11 reaction on fluorinated penta-
cenequinone to provide a precursor to the fluorinated,
contorted HBCs shown in Figure 1. This reaction yields a
The addition of fluorenyl units5 and oligothiophenes6 at
the peripheral aromatic rings of planar and contorted HBCs,
respectively, has been shown to alter the optical absorbance
and the HOMO and LUMO energy levels of the parent
compound in addition to improving the molecular packing
in the solid state. In the same vein, select fluorination of the
outer aromatic rings of planar HBC is found to enhance the
molecule’s electron-withdrawing nature;7 fluorinated planar
HBC is reported to transport electrons with a mobility of
10-2 cm2/V·s.8 More interestingly, this compound is shown
to adopt a face-to-face type packing motif in the solid state
rather than the herringbone structure that is found in its parent
compound due to the larger van der Waals radius of fluorine.8
Inspired by the work of Mori et al.,8 we wanted to examine
the influence of fluorine-fluorine intramolecular interactions
on the molecular conformation of contorted HBCs given their
already-unusual doubly concave conformation.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of 8F- (1a), 12F- (1b), 16F- (1c),
and 20F-HBC (1d). Close fluorine-fluorine intramolecular contacts
(<2.6 Å) are highlighted in red for 1c and 1d.
In this study, we report the synthesis and characterization
of a series of contorted HBCs with differing amounts of
fluorination on its exterior aromatic rings.9 Functionalized
contorted HBCs have been previously realized via double
Barton-Kellogg reactions of the appropriate pentacene-
quinones followed by photocyclization or Scholl cycliza-
tion.10 The synthetic scheme used here is different than those
employed in the past and is shown in Scheme 1. We carried
tetrabrominated intermediate, 2. Subjecting 2 to a Suzuki-
Miyaura12 reaction with the appropriate fluorinated phenyl
boronic acid (3a-d) yielded the desired bisolefin compound,
4a-d. We then employed the Katz-modified Mallory pho-
tocyclization13,14 on 4a-d; the products from these reactions
consisted of a mixture of half-cyclized and fully cyclized
HBCs (1a-d). Given the solubility differences between the
half- and fully cyclized HBCs, we isolated the half-cyclized
products and imposed upon them Scholl cyclizations per
Plunkett et al.9 to yield the fully cyclized products, 1a′-d′.
Given the wide availability of functionalized phenyl boronic
acids, this route brings about tremendous flexibility and
modularity to the synthesis of contorted HBCs with different
substitution.
Scheme 1
.
General Strategy for Synthesizing Fluorinated,
Contorted HBCs
X-ray crystallography indicates that the fluorinated, con-
torted HBCs that result from photocyclization adopt molec-
ular conformations that are not significantly different from
that of their hydrogen-substituted counterpart. They adopt,
for example, the doubly concave conformation that charac-
terizes contorted hexabenzocoronenes.2-4 At first blush, it
thus appears that substituting hydrogens with fluorines on
the peripheral aromatic rings of contorted HBCs does not
affect their molecular conformations.
(4) Tremblay, N. J.; Gorodetsky, A. A.; Cox, M. P.; Schiros, T.; Kim,
B.; Steiner, R.; Bullard, Z.; Sattler, A.; So, W.-Y.; Itoh, Y.; Toney, M. F.;
Ogasawa, H.; Ramirez, A. P.; Kymissis, I.; Steigerwald, M. L.; Nuckolls,
C. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 799–803.
1
The H NMR spectrum of 8F-HBC obtained upon Scholl
cyclization (1a′) is in all respects identical to that of 8F-HBC
obtained after photocyclization (1a), indicating that 1a′ and 1a
are chemically and conformationally indistinguishable. We
(5) Wong, W. W. H.; Singh, T. B.; Vak, D.; Pisula, W.; Yan, C.; Feng,
X.; Williams, E. L.; Chan, K. L.; Mao, Q.; Jones, D. J.; Ma, C.-Q.; Mu¨llen,
K.; Bau¨erle, P.; Holmes, A. B. AdV. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 927–938.
(6) Unpublished data.
(7) Etani, S.; Kaji, T.; Ikeda, S.; Mori, T.; Kikuzawa, Y.; Takeuchi, H.;
Saiki, K. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 6202–6207.
(11) Neidlein, R.; Winter, M. Synthesis 1998, 9, 1362–1366.
(12) (a) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2457–2483. (b)
Bauer, A.; Miller, M. W.; Vice, S. F.; McCombie, S. W. Synlett 2001, 2,
(8) Mori, T.; Kikuzawa, Y.; Takeuchi, H. Org. Electron. 2008, 9, 328–
332.
(9) Gorodetsky, A. A.; Chiu, C. Y.; Schiros, T.; Palma, M.; Sattler, W.;
Kymissis, I.; Steigerwald, M.; Nuckolls, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. published
online Sept. 16, 2010; DOI: 10.1002/anie.201004055.
254–256
(13) Mallory, F. B.; Wood, C. S.; Gordon, J. T.; Lindquist, L. C.; Savitz,
M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 4361–4362
(14) Liu, L. B.; Yang, B. W.; Katz, T. J.; Poindexter, M. K. J. Org.
Chem. 1991, 56, 3769–3775
.
.
(10) Plunkett, K. N.; Godula, K.; Nuckolls, C.; Tremblay, N.; Whalley,
A. C.; Xiao, S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2225–2228.
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 21, 2010
4841