by thermally induced rearrangements seldom have been
reported. Since high temperature is usually required for the
thermally induced rearrangements of the analogues of MCPs,
such as cyclopropenes and vinylcyclopropanes due to certain
activation energy required,5 this may account for the ring-
opening reactions of MCPs by thermally induced rearrange-
ments normally being difficult to occur. Previously, we
reported a synthetic route to 2,3-disubstituted pyrrolamides
by ring-opening recyclization of benzylidene and alkyl-
idenecyclopropylcarbaldehydes with hydrazides upon heating
in toluene in moderate to good yields (Scheme 1).6
diketone might also undergo a rearrangement reaction upon
heating, but with a different outcome due to the unique
properties of diketones. Herein, we wish to report a novel
thermally induced electrocyclic reaction of MCP methylene
diketone derivatives to synthesize spiro[2.5]octa-3,5-dienes
upon heating.
We initially utilized (E)-3-((2-benzylidenecyclopropyl)-
methylene)pentane-2,4-dione 1a as the substrate to investi-
gate its behavior upon heating in toluene at 100 °C. To our
surprise, a new cyclopropane-containing product 2a, which
was later confirmed as trans-spiro[2.5]octa-3,5-diene, was
obtained in 56% yield instead of the cyclopentene product
derived from a Cope rearrangement (Table 1, entry 1). When
Scheme 1
.
Previous Studies on the Ring-Opening Reactions of
MCP Derivatives upon Heating
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
temp
(°C)
time
(min)
yield of
2a (%)a
entry
additive
solvent
1
2
toluene 100
20
56
Ph PO H
2
2
(10 mol %)
FeCl3 (1 0 mol %) toluene
DCE
50
60
9 h
30
22
complex
3
4
Later, we also reported an efficient method to stereospe-
cifically synthesize trans-substituted cyclopentene derivatives
via the thermally induced Cope rearrangement of readily
available MCP alkenyl ketone derivatives in moderate to
good yields (Scheme 1).7 Furthermore, Renaud and co-
workers reported the addition of enolizable 1,3-diketone to
R,ꢀ-unsaturated aldehydes leading to substituted 2H-pyrans
via a formal [3 + 3] cycloaddition.8 On the basis of these
previous works, we hypothesized that MCP methylene
CF CO2H
3
(5 mol %)
tartaric acid
(20 mol %)
DCM
rt
20
15
complex
48
5
toluene
DCM
toluene
toluene
100
rt
100
100
6
7
8
9
1 day 19b
30
10
46c
42d
tBu4NOAc
(1 equiv)
TEMPO (1 equiv) xylene
toluene
100
120
20
10
54
56
10
a Isolated yields. b The reaction mixture was irradiated by ultraviolet
light. c The reaction was kept in the dark. d The reaction was conducted
under microwave.
(3) For transition metal-catalyzed ring reactions of MCPs, see: (a)
Lautens, M.; Ren, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10668–10669. (b) Ma,
S.; Zhang, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 183–187. (c) Ma, S.; Lu,
L.; Zhang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9645–9660. (d) Smolensky, E.;
Kapon, M.; Eisen, M. S. Organometallics 2007, 26, 4510–4527. (e)
Nakamura, I.; Oh, B. H.; Saito, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 1298–1300. (f) Kurahashi, T.; de Meijere, A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 7881–7884. (g) Huang, X.; Zhou, H. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4419–
4422.
several acids such as Ph2PO2H, FeCl3, CF3CO2H, and tartaric
acid were present in the reaction system, the yields of product
2a were lower than 56%, indicating that this reaction was
not tolerant to acidic conditions (Table 1, entries 2-5). The
UV photolytic reaction of 1a in DCM at room temperature
required a reaction time of 1 day, and the yield of 2a was
only 19% (Table 1, entry 6). When this reaction was kept in
the dark or heated by microwave at 100 °C, the yields of 2a
dropped to 46% and 42%, respectively (Table 1, entries 7
(4) For work from our group, see: (a) Shi, M.; Xu, B.; Huang, J.-W.
Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1175–1178. (b) Jiang, M.; Shi, M. Tetrahedron 2009,
65, 5222–5227. (c) Shi, M.; Liu, L.-P.; Tang, J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4043–
4046. (d) Yao, L.-F.; Shi, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 4971–4983. (e)
Jiang, M.; Liu, L.-P.; Shi, M.; Li, Y.-X. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 116–119. (f)
Shao, L.-X.; Shi, M. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 4551–4554. (g) Jiang, M.; Shi,
M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2606–2609. (h) Huang, X.; Miao, M.-Z. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 6884–6887.
(5) The thermally induced rearrangements for the analogues of MCPs,
such as cyclopropenes and vinylcyclopropanes, have been investigated;
please see: (a) Houk, K. N.; Nendel, M.; Wiest, O.; Storer, J. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10545–10546. (b) Baldwin, J. E.; Bonacorsi, S., Jr.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8258–8265. (c) Gajewski, J. J. Hydrocarbons
Thermal Isomerizations; Academic: New York, 1980; pp 81-87. (d) Baird,
M. S. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 1271–1294. (e) Baldwin, J. E. Chem. ReV.
2003, 103, 1197–1212.
t
and 8). Furthermore, phase transfer catalyst Bu4NOAc did
not work well either in this reaction (Table 1, entry 9).
Finally, it was found that free radical scavenger 2,2,6,6-
tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO) did not inhibit this
reaction, rendering unlikely the involvement of a simple
radical pathway (Table 1, entry 10).
Repeated attempts to increase the yield of 2a were
unsuccessful. In fact, as shown by TLC, there was a product
in addition to 2a, which was easily decomposed during
(6) Tang, X.-Y.; Shi, M. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5983–5986.
(7) Tang, X.-Y.; Shi, M. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 902–905.
(8) (a) Hubert, C.; Moreau, J.; Batany, J.; Duboc, A.; Hurvois, J.-P.;
Renaud, J. L. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 40–42. (b) Moreau, J.; Hubert,
C.; Batany, J.; Toupet, L.; Roisnel, T.; Hurvois, J.-P.; Renaud, J.-L. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 8963–8973.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 22, 2010
5121