D. Xiao et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 6313–6315
6315
SOtBu
N
NHSOtBu
Ph
HN
O
Ph
R2
Ph
1) NaH
Br
CO2Et
1) NHRR',Me3Al
2) H2, Pd/C
O
O
CF
CO2Et
3
CF3
CF3
3) HCl/dioxane
2) Grubbs'2nd
generation catalyst
9
3
8
CF3
CF3
CF3
Scheme 3.
Table 2
Acknowledgments
R2
F3C
The authors thank Dr. John J. Piwinski for supporting this re-
search program and Dr. Jonathan R. Young for helpful comments
on this Letter.
CF3
HN
Ph
O
Entry
R2
Ki (NK1)
(nM)
GFT at 4 h
Rat AUC (po)
ng h/ml
References and notes
1. Jones, S.; Gibbins, J. M. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2008, 8, 114.
2. Alvaro, G.; Di Fabio, R. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2007, 10, 613.
3. Duffy, R. A. Exp. Opin. Emerg. Drugs 2004, 9, 9.
4. Albert, J. S. Exp. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2004, 14, 1412.
5. Dando, T. M.; Perry, C. M. Drugs 2004, 64, 777.
6. Harrson, T.; Willaims, B. J.; Swain, C. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 2733.
7. Xiao, D.; Lavey, B. J.; Palani, A.; Wang, C.; Aslanian, R. G.; Kozlowski, J. A.; Shih,
N. Y.; McPhail, A. T.; Randolph, G. P.; Lachowicz, J. E.; Duffy, R. A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 7653.
8. Xiao, D.; Wang, C.; Palani, A.; Reichard, G.; Aslanian, R.; Shih, N.-Y.; Buevich, A.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17, 2596.
O
9a
0.22
0.19
0.26
92% at 1 mpk
2600 at 5 mpk, 24 h
NH2
82% at 0.3 mpk
T1/2 = 3.4 h, BA = 68%
O
9b
9c
90% at 1 mpk
1693 at 10 mpk, 6 h
NH2
75% at 0.3 mpk
O
9. Stevenson, G. I.; MacLeod, A. M.; Huscroft, I.; Cascieri, M. A.; Sadowski, S.;
Baker, R. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1264.
91% at 1 mpk
ND
HN
10. NK1 assay: Binding data are the average of two or three independent
determinations. Receptor binding assays were performed on membrane
preparations from CHO cells in which recombinant human NK1 receptors
were expressed. [3H]-Sar-Met substance P was used as the ligand for the NK1
assay, at concentrations near the experimentally derived Kd value. Ki values
were obtained using the Cheng and Prusoff equation. Cascieri, M. A.; Macleod,
A. M.; Underwood, D.; Shiao, L. L.; Ber, E.; Sadowski, S.; Yu, H.; Merchant, K. J.;
Swain, C. J.; Strader, C. D.; Fong, T. M. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 6587.
11. Fordetermination of GerbilFoot Thump(GFT) activity:TheNK1 agonist GR73632
29% at 0.3 mpk
O
9d
9e
0.56
0.37
80% at 1 mpk
166 at 10 mpk, 6 h
3676 at 10 mpk, 6 h
HN
O
92% at 1 mpk
HN Et
O
28% at 0.3 mpk
(3 pmol in 5 ll) was administered centrally to female Mongolian gerbils via icv
injection. Immediately following recovery from the anesthesia, gerbils were
placed into clear Plexiglas boxes for 5 min, and the duration of foot tapping was
measured. Foot tapping was defined as rhythmic, repetitive tapping of the hind
feet. NK1 antagonists were administered orally in 0.4% methylcellulose in
distilled water at the dose indicated at various pretreatment times prior to
injection of GR73632. Data are expressed as a percent decrease (% inhibition) in
the amount of time spent foot tapping compared to vehicle-treated controls.
Rupniak, N. M. J.; Williams, A. R. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1994, 265, 179.
12. The rat PK assay was run at 10 mpk (unless otherwise specified) using oral
dosing with 20% HPBCD as vehicle. AUC was determined from 0 to 6 h. For
reference: Cox, K. A.; Dunn-Meynell, K.; Korfmacher, W. A.; Broske, L.; Nomeir,
A. A.; Lin, C. C.; Cayen, M. N.; Barr, W. H. Drug Discovery Today 1999, 4, 232.
13. Bonaventure, P.; Letavic, M.; Dugovic, C.; Wilson, S.; Aluisio, L.; Pudiak, C.; Lord,
B.; Mazur, C.; Kamme, F.; Nishino, S.; Carruthers, N.; Lovenberg, T. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 2007, 73, 1084.
9f
1.13
0.34
0.40
78% at 1 mpk
45% at 1 mpk
69% at 1 mpk
ND
HN Et
O
9g
9h
1939 at 10 mpk, 6 h
ND
HN
O
HN
In conclusion we presented two series of piperidine NK1 antag-
onists, which demonstrated potent in vivo and in vitro activity.
They also have distinct metabolic pathways. Further optimization
of these analogs to obtain drug candidates with optimum
in vitro, in vivo and pharmacokinetic properties will be reported
in due course.
14. Gum, R. J.; Hickman, D.; Fagerland, J. A.; Heindel, M. A.; Gagne, G. D.; Schmidt, J.
M.; Michaelides, M. R.; Davidsen, S. K.; Ulrich, R. G. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2001,
62, 1661.
15. Ruben, Z.; Dodd, D. C.; Rorig, K. J.; Anderson, S. N. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1989,
97, 57.
16. Choi, T.-L.; Chatterjee, A. K.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1277.