C.R. Bhattacharjee et al. / Polyhedron 29 (2010) 3089–3096
3091
2921 (mas(C–H), CH2), 2873 (
ms(C–H), CH3), 2850 (mas(C–H), CH2), 1629
3. Results and discussion
(m
C@N), 1298 (mC–O).
3.1. Spectral investigation
2.2.3. Synthesis of N,N0-bis-(4-(40-n-hexadecyloxy)-salicylidene)-4-
Me-1,2-phenylenediamine (16-mpd)
The characterizations of the compounds were made by elemen-
tal analyses, FT-IR, 1H NMR, and mass spectrometry. The analytical
data of the compounds Table 1, are in good agreement with the
proposed formulae of the compounds. The shift of mCN vibrational
Yield: 0.21 g (73%); m.p., 128 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
d = 13.01 (s, 1H, H9), 8.72 (s, 1H, H4), 7.77 (d, J = 8.54 Hz, H5),
7.24 (d, 2H, H7), 7.15 (dd, J = 2.41 Hz, J = 9.0, 2H, H6), 7.14 (t,
J = 8.43, 2H, H1), 6.49 (dd, J = 2.14 Hz, J = 8.29 Hz, 2H, H2), 6.45 (d,
J = 2.13 Hz, 2H, H3), 3.91 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, –OCH2), 2.5 (s, 1H, H8),
0.98 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3), 0.82 (m, –CH2 of methylene proton in
stretching frequency at ca. 1625 cmꢀ1 to lower wave number (
Dm
ꢁ30 cmꢀ1) and absence of mOH mode upon chelation, clearly sug-
gested the coordination of azomethine N and phenolate oxygen
to the metal. The mC@N stretching frequency is rather independent
of the length of alkoxy side chain in both ligands and their com-
plexes. A comparison of the 1H NMR spectral data of the ligands
with those of the Zn(II) complexes showed the absence of the phe-
nolic –OH and a significant shift (8.324–8.197 ppm) in the peak
positions of the –N@CH in the spectrum of the metal complex, sug-
gesting binding through the phenolate anion and the azomethine
nitrogen atom of the ligand to the metal ion [27]. The FAB-mass
spectra Table 1, of the Zn(II) complexes are concordant with their
formula weights. These features compare well with a related struc-
turally analogous fluorescent but non-mesogenic 4-methoxy
substituted-salophen-zinc complex (Fig. 1) [9], and a dodecyloxy-
bis-(salicylaldiminato)zinc(II) complexes stacked in 3D aggrega-
tion with no reported mesogenicity [11].
side chain). IR (mmax;cmꢀ1 , KBr): 3434 (
2918 ( as(C–H), CH2), 2844 ( s(C–H), CH3), 2845 (
C@N), 1289 ( C–O).
m
OH), 2916 (
mas(C–H), CH3),
m
m
m
as(C–H), CH2), 1622
(m
m
2.2.4. Synthesis of N,N0-bis-(4-(40-n-tetradecyloxy)-salicylidene)-4-
Me-1,2-phenylenediamine (14-mpd)
Yield: 0.19 g (74%) m.p., 130 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d
13.12 (s, 1H, H9), 8.77 (s, 1H, H4), 7.74 (d, J = 8.54 Hz, H5), 7.24
(d, 2H, H7), 7.23 (dd, J = 2.81 Hz, J = 9.0, 2H, H6), 7.15 (t, J = 8.43,
2H, H1), 6.66 (d, J = 2.44 Hz, 2H, H3), 6.43 (dd, J = 2.44 Hz,
J = 8.29 Hz, 2H, H2), 3.97 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, –OCH2), 2.5 (s, 1H, H8).
0.99 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 6H, CH3), 0.88 (m, –CH2 of methylene proton in
side chain). IR (mmax;cmꢀ1 , KBr): 3433 (
2919 ( as(C–H), CH2), 2849 ( s(C–H), CH3), 2850 (
1626( C@N), 1287( C–O).
m
OH), 2918 (
m
as(C–H), CH3),
m
m
mas(C–H), CH2),
m
m
3.2. Photophysical properties
2.2.5. Synthesis of mononuclear zinc(II) complexes (Zn-nmpd
n = 14,16,18)
The electronic absorption spectra (Fig. 2), of n-mpd (n = 14, 16,
18) recorded in dichloromethane (10ꢀ4 M), consisted of two peaks
at 291 and 333 nm and a very-low intensity band at ꢁ364 nm. The
2.2.5.1. General procedure. The ligand 18-mpd (0.075 g,0.1 mmol)
or 16-mpd (0.062 g,0.1 mmol) or 14-mpd (0.060 g.0.01 mmol)
was dissolved in minimum volume of absolute ethanol. To this,
an equimolar amount of zinc acetate Zn(OAc)2ꢂ2H2O (0.02 g,
0.1 mmol) in methanol was then added slowly and stirred for 2 h
at room temperature. A yellow solid formed immediately was fil-
tered, washed with diethyl ether and recrystallised from chloro-
form–ethanol (1:1).
band at ꢁ291 and ꢁ333 nm are attributed to a
p–p* transition
localized on the aromatic rings, whereas the band at ꢁ364 nm is
due to the n– * excitation of the lone pair on the imine nitrogen
atom to the * orbital on the C@N fragment [19]. The Zn(II) com-
p
p
plexes showed two intense bands at ꢁ313 and ꢁ375 nm resulting
from the metal-perturbed ligand-centered transitions, which have
the same origin as the two principal bands of the ligand spectrum
[19]. Further, on complexation the bands at ꢁ364 nm of the ligands
are red shifted to ꢁ425 nm, which appeared as a shoulder in the
spectra. This has originated from the donation of lone pair
2.2.5.2. Zn-18mpd. Yield = 0.0.07 g (75%) 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): d, 8.21 (s, 1H, H4), 7.70 (d, J = 8.51 Hz, H5), 7.20 (d, 2H,
H7), 7.12 (t, J = 8.34, 2H, H1), 7.01 (dd, J = 2.35 Hz, J = 8.59, 2H,
H6), 6.56 (d, J = 2.44 Hz, 2H, H3), 6.39 (dd, J = 2.34 Hz, J = 8.19 Hz,
2H, H2), 3.97 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, –OCH2), 2.1 (s, 1H, H8), 0.89 (t,
J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3), 0.86 (m, –CH2 of methylene proton in side
Table 1
Mass spectrometric and elemental analysis data of Zn-nmpd.a
Complex
FAB+
%C
%H
%N
chain). IR (mmax;cmꢀ1 , KBr): 2920 (mas(C–H), CH3), 2850 (mas(C–H), CH2),
1612 ( C@N).
m
Zn-18mpd
Zn-16mpd
Zn-14mpd
928 (929)
872 (873)
815 (816)
73.2 (73.5)
72.1 (72.7)
70.4 (70.9)
9.4 (9.6)
9.5 (9.3)
8.5 (8.8)
3.1 (3.0)
3.3 (3.2)
3.2 (3.4)
2.2.5.3. Zn-16mpd. Yield = 0.03 g (70%) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
d, 8.04 (s, 1H, H4), 7.70 (d, J = 8.51 Hz, H5), 7.25 (d, 2H, H7), 7.10
(t, J = 8.34 Hz, 2H, H1), 7.09 (dd, J = 2.35 Hz, J = 8.59, 2H, H6), 6.54
(d, J = 2.44 Hz, 2H, H3), 6.32 (dd, J = 2.34 Hz, J = 8.19 Hz, 2H, H2),
3.97 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, –OCH2), 2.1 (s, 1H, H8) 0.89 (t, J = 6.8 Hz,
6H, CH3), 0.84 (m, –CH2 of methylene proton in side chain). IR
a
Calculated values are in brackets.
(
mmax;cmꢀ1 , KBr): 2919 (
C@N).
mas(C–H), CH3), 2849 (mas(C–H), CH2), 1583
(m
N
N
2.2.5.4. Zn-14mpd. Yield = 0.06 g (75%) 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
d, 8.21 (s, 1H, H4), 7.70 (d, J = 8.51 Hz, H5), 7.21 (d, 2H, H7), 7.16
(t, J = 8.34 Hz, 2H, H1),7.01 (dd, J = 2.35 Hz, J = 8.54, 2H, H6), 6.56
(d, J = 2.44 Hz, 2H, H3), 6.39 (dd, J = 2.34 Hz, J = 8.19 Hz, 2H, H2),
3.97 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, –OCH2), 2.1 (s, 1H, H8), 0.99 (t,
J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3), 0.89 (m, –CH2 of methylene proton in side
Zn
O
O
H3CO
OCH3
chain). IR (mmax;cmꢀ1 , KBr): 2919 (mas(C–H), CH3), 2851 (mas(C–H), CH2),
1589( C@N).
m
Fig. 1. Zinc salophen complex with 4-methoxy substituent.