quential methods would preclude protecting group manipula-
tion. In addition, the expected high diastereoselectivities
through the tight chairlike transition states would be an
attractive advantage in these sequential reactions.
Scheme 1
.
Two Types of Sequential Sigmatropic
Rearrangements
Our studies of the sequential Claisen/Claisen rearrange-
ment commenced with enantiopure E-allylic syn-diol 6a
derived from tartaric acid (Table 1). As we expected,
Table 1. Sequential Claisen/Claisen Rearrangements of Allylic
Diols 6a-ca
proceed in one pot and install two identical functional groups.
On the other hand, the sequential Claisen/Overman rear-
rangement (1f4f5) would introduce two different func-
tional groups.6 This transformation is more challenging
because it requires the suppression of the second competitive
Claisen rearrangement (4f2f3) following the first trans-
formation.7 If the single rearrangement of 1 can be com-
pletely controlled, however, a variety of sigmatropic rear-
rangements, including the Overman rearrangement (4f5),8,9
could be subsequently applied to the resultant allylic alcohol.
To synthesize 3 and 5 by classical sigmatropic rearrange-
ments, protection of the homoallylic alcohol in 1 is required
prior to the first rearrangement, with the second reaction
performed after deprotection. However, our proposed se-
entry
diol
time (d)
product
yield (%)
1
2
3
6a
6b
6c
2
2
2.5
7a
7b
7c
87
81
66
a Conditions: 55 µmol of 6, 20 equiv of MeC(OMe)2NMe2, t-BuPh (0.03
M), 180 °C in a sealed tube.
Eschenmoser’s conditions with excess MeC(OMe)2NMe2 at
180 °C in a sealed tube provided 7a in 87% yield (entry
1).10 The reaction proceeded diastereoselectively, with 7a
isolated as the sole product. High stereoselection was also
observed in the reaction of Z-allylic syn-diol 6b to give 7b
in 81% yield (entry 2). Because both enantiomers of the syn-
diols are readily available, all possible stereoisomers of 7
can be synthesized by choosing the appropriate combinations
of the diol stereochemistry and the olefin geometry. The
sequential rearrangement of the trisubstituted olefin 6c
enabled us to construct two contiguous stereocenters includ-
ing a highly congested quaternary carbon (entry 3).
Having successfully developed the sequential Claisen/
Claisen rearrangement, we turned our attention to the more
challenging Claisen/Overman version (Table 2). To circum-
vent the inherent problem of overreaction after the first
rearrangement (Scheme 1, 4f2f3), we envisioned the first
Claisen rearrangement via cyclic orthoamides.11 Addition of
1 equiv of MeC(OMe)2NMe2 to a solution of diol 6a and
o-xylene led to the formation of cyclic orthoamide 8a at room
temperature (entry 1). The resulting orthoamide 8a was then
heated to 160 °C in the same reaction vessel to furnish the
singly rearranged product 10a through N,O-ketene acetal 9a
in 16% yield, along with recovery of starting material 6a.
Although use of 2 equiv of MeC(OMe)2NMe2 increased
(4) For selected reviews on Claisen rearrangements, see: (a) Castro,
A. M. M. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 2939–3002. (b) Majumdar, K. C.; Alam,
S.; Chattopadhyay, B. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 597–643.
(5) We reported the formal synthesis of (-)-morphine using the Claisen/
Claisen rearrangement of a cyclic allylic diol; see: (a) Tanimoto, H.; Saito,
R.; Chida, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 358–362. For selected examples
of Claisen/Claisen rearrangements except for an aromatic version, see: (b)
Curran, D. P.; Suh, Y.-G. Carbohydr. Res. 1987, 171, 161–191.
(6) For selected examples of sequential reactions including Claisen
rearrangements, see: (a) Thomas, A. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 3281–
3289. (b) Ziegler, F. E.; Piwinski, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 1611–
1612. (c) Raucher, S.; Burks, J. E., Jr.; Hwang, K.-J.; Svedberg, D. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 1853–1855. (d) Mikami, K.; Taya, S.; Nakai, T.;
Fujita, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 5447–5449. (e) Mulzer, V. J.; Bock, H.;
Eck, W.; Buschmann, J.; Luger, P. Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 450–452. (f)
Posner, G. H.; Carry, J.-C.; Crouch, R. D.; Johnson, N. J. Org. Chem. 1991,
56, 6987–6993. (g) Barriault, L.; Denissova, I. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1371–
1374. (h) Sauer, E. L. O.; Barriault, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8569–
8575. (i) Pelc, M. J.; Zakarian, A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1629–1631. (j) Li,
X.; Ovaska, T. V. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3837–3840. (k) Ilardi, E. A.; Isaacman,
M. J.; Qin, Y.-C.; Shelly, S. A.; Zakarian, A. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 3261–
3269.
(7) Curran reported the single Claisen rearrangement of an allylic bis-
ketenesilylacetal; see ref 5b.
(8) (a) Overman, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 597–599. For reviews
on Overman rearrangements, see: (b) Overman, L. E.; Carpenter, N. E. In
Organic Reactions; Overman, L. E., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, 2005;
Vol. 66, pp 1-107.
(9) We reported a sequential Overman/Overman rearrangement in the
total syntheses of biologically active compounds; see: (a) Momose, T.;
Hama, N.; Higashino, C.; Sato, H.; Chida, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49,
1376–1379. (b) Hama, N.; Matsuda, T.; Sato, T.; Chida, N. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 2687–2690. For selected examples of sequential reactions including
Overman rearrangements, see: (c) Villemin, D.; Hachemi, M. Synth.
Commun. 1996, 26, 1329–1334. (d) Banert, K.; Fendel, W.; Schlott, J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3289–3292. (e) Demay, S.; Kotschy, A.;
Knochel, P. Synthesis 2001, 863–866. (f) Singh, O. V.; Han, H. Org. Lett.
(10) Stereochemistries of 7a-c and 11a-c were established through
their cyclic derivatives and subsequent NOE experiments; see the Supporting
Information.
(11) Overman rearrangements through cyclic orthoamides were reported;
see: (a) Vyas, D. M.; Chiang, Y.; Doyle, T. W. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49,
2037–2039. (b) Danishefsky, S.; Lee, J. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111,
4829–4837.
2004, 6, 3067–3070
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 24, 2010
5757