2488
E. Ruijter et al.
LETTER
(8) For catalytic asymmetric Pictet–Spengler-type reactions,
hexacyclic alkaloid-type compounds in an efficient two-
step sequence. The products are typically mixtures of tau-
tomerized and oxidized cyclization products. When elec-
tron-deficient cinnamaldehyde derivatives were used, the
secondary cyclization afforded primarily the tautomerized
products, which could subsequently be oxidized to the ar-
omatic compounds by treatment with DDQ. The short and
efficient synthetic sequence and the variability of the
products make this approach very promising for the con-
struction of arrays of natural product-like compounds
with potential biological activity.
see: (a) Seayad, J.; Seayad, A. M.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 1086. (b) Mergott, D. J.; Zuend, S. J.; Jacobsen,
E. N. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 745. (c) Wanner, M. J.;
van der Haas, R. N. S.; de Cuba, K. R.; van Maarseveen,
J. H.; Hiemstra, H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7485.
(d) Sewgobind, N. V.; Wanner, M. J.; Ingemann, S.;
de Gelder, R.; van Maarseveen, J. H.; Hiemstra, H. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 6405. (e) Klausen, R. S.; Jacobsen, E. N.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 887. (f) Muratore, M. E.; Holloway,
C. A.; Pilling, A. W.; Storer, R. I.; Trevitt, G.; Dixon, D. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10796.
(9) Revell, K. D.; Srinivasan, N.; Ganesan, A. Synlett 2004,
1428.
(10) (a) Paulvannan, K.; Hale, R.; Mesis, R.; Chen, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 203. (b) Fokas, D.; Yu, L.;
Baldino, C. M. Mol. Diversity 2005, 9, 81.
(11) (a) Toyota, M.; Terashima, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30,
829. (b) Chackalamannil, S.; Doller, D.; Clasby, M.; Xia, Y.;
Eagen, K.; Lin, Y.; Tsai, H.-A.; McPhail, A. T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 4043. (c) Chackalamannil, S.; Doller, D.;
Eagen, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5101.
Acknowledgment
We thank Dr. M. T. Smoluch (VU University Amsterdam) for
(HR)MS measurements.
References and Notes
(1) (a) Henkel, T.; Brunne, R. M.; Müller, H.; Reichel, F.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 35, 643. (b) Lee, M.-L.;
Schneider, G. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 284. (c) Feher, M.;
Schmidt, J. M. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 218.
(d) Wessjohann, L. A.; Ruijter, E.; Garcia-Rivera, D.;
Brandt, W. Mol. Diversity 2005, 9, 171.
(12) Wang, H.; Ganesan, A. Org. Lett. 1999, 1647.
(13) Keskin, H.; Miller, R. E.; Nord, F. F. J. Org. Chem. 1952, 16,
199.
(14) Standard Procedure for NAIPS Reaction
Tryptamine or 3,4-dimethoxyphenethylamine (1 or 2, 2.00
mmol) and the appropriate cinnamaldehyde derivative (3a–
f, 2.10 mmol) were dissolved in HC(OMe)3 (10 mL) and
stirred for 3 h at r.t. The volatiles were removed in vacuo,
and the residue was dissolved in anhyd CH2Cl2 (15 mL) and
cooled to 0 °C. Phenylpropiolyl chloride (4, 2.10 mmol) was
added, and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at 0 °C. The
reaction was quenched by addition of sat. aq NaHCO3. The
organic phase was separated, dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and
concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by
flash chromatography.
(2) Lipinski, C.; Hopkins, A. Nature (London) 2004, 432, 955.
(3) For example, see: (a) Dobson, C. M. Nature (London) 2004,
432, 824. (b) Clardy, J.; Walsh, C. Nature (London) 2004,
432, 829. (c) Wessjohann, L. A.; Ruijter, E. Top. Curr.
Chem. 2004, 243, 137. (d) Ortholand, J.-Y.; Ganesan, A.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 271. (e) Boldi, A. M.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 281. (f) Reayi, A.; Arya,
P. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 240. (g) Shang, S.; Tan,
D. S. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 248. (h) Messer, R.;
Fuhrer, C. A.; Haener, R. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9,
259. (i) Ulaczyk-Lesanko, A.; Hall, D. G. Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 2005, 9, 266. (j) Arya, P.; Quevillon, S.; Joseph, R.;
Wei, C.-Q.; Gan, Z.; Parisien, M.; Sesmilo, E.; Reddy, P. T.;
Chen, Z.-X.; Durieux, P.; Laforce, D.; Campeau, L.-C.;
Khadem, S.; Couve-Bonnaire, S.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, U.;
Leek, D. M.; Daroszewska, M.; Barnes, M. L. Pure Appl.
Chem. 2005, 77, 163. (k) Koch, M. A.; Schuffenhauer, A.;
Scheck, M.; Wetzel, S.; Casaulta, M.; Odermatt, A.; Ertl, P.;
Waldmann, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102,
17272.
(4) (a) Schreiber, S. L. Science 2000, 287, 1964. (b) Burke,
M. D.; Berger, E. M.; Schreiber, S. L. Science 2003, 302,
613. (c) Burke, M. D.; Berger, E. M.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14095. (d) Burke, M. D.; Schreiber,
S. L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 46.
(5) For a review, see: Tietze, L. F. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115.
(6) For reviews, see: (a) Dömling, A.; Ugi, I. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2000, 39, 3168. (b) Zhu, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
1133. (c) Orru, R. V. A.; de Greef, M. Synthesis 2003, 1471.
(d) Dömling, A. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 17.
(15) Standard Procedure for Microwave-Assisted IMDA
Reaction
Compound 5 or 6 (10 or 500 mg) were dissolved in toluene
(5 mL) and heated to 170 °C for 15 min using a CEM
Discover microwave reactor. The product was either
analyzed directly by 1H NMR (in case of quantitative
conversion/10 mg scale) or purified by flash
chromatography (500 mg scale).
(16) Procedure for DDQ Oxidation of 7 to 8
Compound 7e or 7f (1.0 equiv) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and
DDQ (2.0 equiv) was added. The mixture was stirred for 1 h
at r.t., concentrated in vacuo, and purified by flash
chromatography to afford 8e and 8f, respectively.
(17) Data for Compound 7e
Rf = 0.26 (EtOAc–cyclohexane = 4:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz):
d = 7.79 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.39–7.22 (m, 6 H), 7.16
(d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 6.73 (s, 1 H), 6.60 (s, 1 H), 4.54 (d,
J = 2.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.34 (ddd, J = 13.0, 6.0, 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.98–
3.93 (m, 1 H), 3.87 (s, 3 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 3.12 (dd, J = 16.4,
16.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.04 (td, J = 12.5, 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.91–2.87 (m,
2 H), 2.67 (dd, J = 15.8, 2.2 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz):
d = 164.1, 149.4, 148.4, 148.3, 138.83, 138.81, 134.6, 132.4,
131.6, 129.5, 128.3, 128.0 (2 C), 127.9, 127.4, 126.0, 124.2,
111.9, 107.3, 60.9, 56.2, 55.9, 41.0, 37.4, 29.8, 28.3. IR
(neat): n = 2932, 2835, 2245, 1678, 1516, 1416, 1358, 1254,
1227, 1115, 910, 725, 698 cm–1. ESI-HRMS (+): m/z calcd.
for C28H25N2O5+ [M + H]+: 469.1758; found: 469.1741.
(18) Data for Compound 8e
(7) For recent DOS approaches involving N-acyliminium
chemistry, see: (a) Sunderhaus, J. D.; Dockendorff, C.;
Martin, S. F. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4223. (b) Sunderhaus, J.
D.; Dockendorff, C.; Martin, S. F. Tetrahedron 2009, 65,
6454. (c) Karpov, A. S.; Rominger, F.; Müller, T. J. J. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 4382.
Rf = 0.73 (EtOAc–cyclohexane = 1:1). 1H NMR (250 MHz):
d = 8.35 (dd, J = 1.1, 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 8.05 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1 H),
Synlett 2010, No. 16, 2485–2489 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York