could be easily tuned to provide novel pH sensing elements
in the design of membrane-lytic peptides.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Fmoc-L-f4Y-OH
Fluorination has become an attractive strategy in biomo-
lecular engineering because of the minimal steric perturbation
introduced by replacing hydrogen with fluorine atoms.5 On
the other hand, the high electronegativity of fluorine may
dramatically alter the electronic properties of a target
molecule.6 For example, fluorination of a tyrosine side chain
preferentially stabilizes the phenolate, thus affording tyrosine
isosteres with increased acidity. By varying the number of
fluorine substitutions, tyrosine analogues can be created to
display a wide range of pKa values (∼10 for the native
tyrosine and 5.6 for the tetrafluorinated analogue f4Y).7 These
fluorinated tyrosine analogues have been utilized as probes
to elucidate the mechanisms of a number of enzymes,
including kinases and ribonucleotide reductases.7,8 Herein
we show that f4Y serves as an effective pH sensor and
activates the membrane-lytic peptide magainin 2 (mag2)
under mildly acidic conditions.
It came as a surprise to us that there was no chemical
synthesis of f4Y that is stereospecific. The only chemical
synthesis of f4Y was reported by Kang and co-workers that
couples 4-methoxy-tetrafluorobenzyl bromide to diethylac-
etamidomalonate to give the racemic mixture of the O-methyl
protected f4Y (Scheme 1a).9 A biosynthetic route for prepar-
ing fluorotyrosine analogues in the enantiomerically pure
form has been developed by the Cole group and the Stubbe
group.7,8 This approach capitalizes on the enzymatic activity
of tyrosine phenol lyase that converts fluorinated phenols to
the corresponding L-fluorotyrosines in the presence of
pyruvate and ammonia (Scheme 1b). While this strategy
works well with mono-, di-, and trifluorine substituted
phenols, the tetrafluorinated analogue appears to be a poor
substrate for the enzyme. Consequently, the preparation of
L-f4Y takes multiple weeks and requires high concentrations
of the enzyme.
We report a short and efficient synthesis of L-f4Y with
the commercially available L-pentafluorophenylalanine
(dubbed L-f5F for brevity) as the starting material (Scheme
1c). The key transformation of our synthesis is the regiose-
lective nucleophilic addition-elimination (SNAr) reaction of
the pentafluorobenzyl moiety.10 Due to the balance between
the favorable inductive effect and the unfavorable resonance
effect, fluorination on the meta position of the reaction center
best accelerates the SNAr reaction (by 106-fold relative to a
hydrogen) followed by the ortho position (57-fold). With
resonance overwhelming the inductive effect, a fluorine
substituent on the para position actually slows down the
reaction by 2-fold. Given these considerations, the fluorine
on Cꢀ of the f5F side chain should be most activated (by
two meta and ortho fluorines) toward SNAr reactions. The
Boc protected L-f5F was chosen as the starting material. Initial
attempts using hydroxide as the nucleophile failed to give
any product in organic or aqueous media. The reaction
proceeded nicely to completion with methoxide as the
nucleophile. Sodium as the counterion afforded a slightly
faster reaction than potassium presumably because sodium
is a stronger Lewis acid (Table 1). Difficulty was encountered
with the removal of the O-methyl protecting group: BBr3
resulted in a messy mixture; even the milder alternative
(5) (a) Meng, H.; Kumar, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15615–22.
(b) Marsh, E. N.; Buer, B. C.; Ramamoorthy, A. Mol. Biosyst. 2009, 5,
1143–7. (c) Hodges, J. A.; Raines, R. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
15923–32.
Table 1. Summary of the SNAr Reaction Conditions To Make
f4Y
(6) (a) Woll, M. G.; Hadley, E. B.; Mecozzi, S.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15932–3. (b) Zheng, H.; Comeforo, K.; Gao, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18–9. (c) Zheng, H.; Gao, J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2010, 49, 8635–9. (d) Meyer, E. A.; Castellano, R. K.; Diederich, F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1210–50. (e) Waters, M. L. Curr. Opin.
Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 736–41.
entry
nucleophile (solvent)
Yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
KOH (tBuOH); KOH (DMSO); NaOH (H2O)
KOtBu (MeOH) f KOMe (MeOH)a, 48 h
NaOMe(MeOH), 36 h
0
>90
>90
88
(7) Kim, K.; Cole, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6851–8.
(8) (a) Seyedsayamdost, M. R.; Yee, C. S.; Stubbe, J. Nat. Protoc. 2007,
2, 1225–35. (b) Seyedsayamdost, M. R.; Reece, S. Y.; Nocera, D. G.;
Na (allyl alcohol) f NaOallyl (allyl alcohol)a
a The nucleophile shown on the right-hand side of the arrow was
Stubbe, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1569–79
.
generated in situ. b 0% yield means no product was identified by crude 19
F
(9) Filler, R.; Ayyangar, N. R.; Gustowsk., W.; Kang, H. H. J. Org.
Chem. 1969, 34, 534–8.
NMR.
(10) Rodionov, P. P.; Furin, G. G. J. Fluor. Chem. 1990, 47, 361–434.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 2, 2011
237