Organic Letters
Letter
revealed that DCM performed best in this protocol. Moreover,
a control experiment with longer wavelengths (450 nm LEDs)
slowed the conversion. The reaction was additionally tested in
dichloroethane at 50 °C for 12 and 24 h, resulting in lower
yields of 2a with notable side reactions (for details, see Table
SI1). Next, various substituted pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles 1 were
investigated to evaluate the generality of the transformation.
Here, C1 phenyl-, heteroaryl-, and alkyl-substituted substrates
afforded the corresponding aldehydes 2a−g in moderate to
good yields (Scheme 2). When vinyl-derived substituents were
Scheme 3. C7−N8 Bond Cleavage of Pyrazolo[1,2-
b
a]pyrazoles
Scheme 2. C1−N8 and C5−N4 Bond Cleavage of
b
Pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles
a
b
Gram scale yield. 1 (0.5 mmol), diethyl bromomalonate (2.0
equiv), 2,6-lutidine (1.5 equiv), DCM (2.5 mL), N2, 18 h.
isolated yield. When the N-methylpyrrole substituted bicycle 1
was reacted under standard conditions, the corresponding N-
acryloyl substituted pyrazole 4o was isolated in a 15% yield,
together with the C5′ malonyl substituted derivative 4o′ in a
50% yield. The coupling of this electron-deficient malonate
radical at the C2 position with electron-rich arenes, such as
a
b
Hydrogens are omitted for clarity. 1 (0.5 mmol), DCM (2.5 mL),
LED400nm, 25 °C, under N2 for 24−48 h.
introduced onto the C1 position of the pyrazolo[1,2-
a]pyrazole scaffold, the ring expansion products 3 were
formed, together with the formation of products 2 (Scheme
2, examples 3h and 3i). The formation of ring-expansion
products 3 commenced via C1−N8 homolytic bond cleavage
followed by radical 7-endo-trig cyclization.13
pyrroles, thiophenes, and furans under visible light-mediated
17
conditions was documented by Stephenson,15 Trapp,16 Noel,
̈
and Wu.18 To demonstrate the scalability of the method, a
gram-scale experiment was performed to give 4a with a
comparable 80% product yield.13
Optimization studies revealed that the presence of
nucleophiles, such as water (Table SI2, entry 10)13 in the
reaction mixture favored the formation of 5a as the major
product. This suggests the possibility of regioselective C5−N4
photoinduced nucleophilic ring opening of pyrazolo[1,2-
a]pyrazoles 1. To explore the substrate and nucleophile
range for these types of transformations, we investigated the
reaction of 1a with various nucleophiles (Scheme 4). In the
presence of diethyl bromomalonate (2.0 equiv) in DCM under
LED450nm irradiation for 19 h at 25 °C, followed by the
addition of water (10 equiv), substrate 1a was successfully
transformed to the corresponding acid 5a in an excellent 97%
yield after isolation (Scheme 4). It is worth noting that in this
case no additional base was required. In addition to water
(Scheme 4, examples 5a, 5g, and 5i), other nucleophiles were
also introduced. The reaction proved to be equally successful
in the presence of methanol and p-cresol, obtaining the
corresponding esters 5b, 5c, 5h, 5j, and 5k in good to excellent
yields. Aliphatic amines and anilines were also tolerated in this
protocol, giving the desired amides 5d and 5e in reasonable
64% and 63% yields, respectively. Moreover, L-alanine methyl
ester was successfully coupled under the developed protocol,
obtaining product 5f in a 60% yield. In addition, the reaction
result was not significantly altered by the substitution pattern
on the pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole core, as exemplified by
products 5g−k. Interestingly, when bicycles 1 were reacted
in THF as the chosen solvent, the corresponding terminal
halohydrin esters 5l and 5m formed in reasonable yields as a
Considering the ability of 1a to act as a reducing agent in the
excited state (Eo*x ∼ − 1.8 V vs SCE),13 the photoreduction of
activated alkyl bromides, such as diethyl bromomalonate (Ered
= −0.62 V vs SCE) or 2-bromoacetophenone (Ered = −1.46 V
vs SCE), would be possible.14 For details and discussion on the
screening of the reaction conditions revealed that 1a could be
converted to the N1-acryloyl-substituted pyrazole 4a and
isolated in 78% yield when irradiated with blue light (450 nm)
in the presence of diethyl bromomalonate (2.0 equiv) and 2,6-
lutidine (1.5 equiv) as the base in DCM. To explore the
substrate scope, the above optimized reaction conditions were
applied to a variety of substituted pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazoles 1
(Scheme 3). Bicycles 1 with electron-withdrawing groups on
the benzene ring, such as chloro and cyano, and electron-
donating substituents, such as methoxy and methyl, were well-
tolerated in the present transformation and showed no obvious
difference in reactivity, as the corresponding products 4a−g
were isolated in good yields. Moreover, the reaction result was
not altered when a naphthalene unit (example 4j) was
introduced. Notably, it was also possible to extend the
substrate range to carbonyl, aminocarbonyl, and carbamate
substituents on both pyrazole rings in bicyclic substrates,
resulting in good yields of the corresponding products 4k, 4l,
and 4n. Alkyl substitution was also tolerated as product 4i was
isolated in a 65% yield. Unfortunately, the styryl-substituted
pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole 1 gave product 4h in a rather low 30%
5295
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 5294−5298