Organic Letters
Letter
compounds from simple 2-bromomethyl arylaldehydes, a
broad range of alkenes, as well as carbon monoxide.
this catalytic reaction was not only suitable for 2-
(bromomethyl)benzaldehyde but also suitable for 2-
(chloromethyl)benzaldehyde (Table 2, entry 1). Subsequently,
Guided by this hypothesis and on the basis of our previous
studies,7,8 we started our studies by investigating the model
reaction among 2-(bromomethyl)benzaldehyde (1a), styrene
(2a), and CO. The initial experiments were conducted in
anisole at 120 °C with [Pd(allyl)Cl]2 as a catalyst precursor
and RuPhos as the ligand. The extensive screening of the base
(Table 1, entries 1−6) showed NaOAc to be the best base,
a
Table 2. Substrate Scope of Aromatic Aldehyde
a
b
c
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
entry
R
X
3
yield (%)
endo/exo
1
2
H
H
4-MeO
3-MeO
5-MeO
4-F
4-Cl
4-Br
5-Br
3-Br
Cl
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
Br
3aa
3aa
3ba
3ca
3da
3ea
3fa
3ga
3ha
3ia
78
82
77
78
72
55
60
70
53
35
61
93:7
93:7
96:4
95:5
93:7
96:4
96:4
96:4
93:7
96:4
97:3
d
3
d
4
d
5
yield,
3aa + 3aa′(%)
b
entry
[Pd]
base
endo/exo
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
[Pd(allyl)Cl]2
Pd2(dba)3
PdCl2
Na2CO3
NaHCO3
NaOAc
KOAc
t-BuONa
DBU
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
15
14
35
15
trace
trace
49
29
51
38
37
33
0
64
69
93 (82)
93:7
93:7
93:7
93:7
4-Ph
3ja
a
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.50 mmol), 2a (0.75 mmol), PdBr2 (5 mol
93:7
93:7
93:7
93:7
93:7
93:7
%), RuPhos (6 mol %), NaOAc (0.75 mmol), anisole (1.0 mL), CO
b
(60 atm), 120 °C, 12 h. Isolated yield (endo + exo) based on the
c
aldehyde. Ratio (endo/exo) of the crude reaction mixture was
9
PdBr2
d
determined by GC and GC−MS. Pd2(dba)3 (2.5 mol %), 80 °C.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(COD)Br2
Pd(CH3CN)2Cl2
Pd(TFA)2
PdBr2
we evaluated a series of aldehyde-tethered benzyl bromides. It
was found that 2-(bromomethyl)benzaldehydes carrying both
electron-rich and -deficient groups tethered with the phenyl
ring reacted smoothly with styrene (2a) in the presence of CO,
affording the corresponding tandem cycloadducts in 35−82%
yields with good to excellent diastereoselectivities. There was
no necessary connection between the position of the
substituent and the reaction efficiency for methoxy-substituted
2-(bromomethyl)benzaldehydes (Table 2, entries 3−5). Be-
sides, the halogen substituents, such as fluoro, chloro and
bromo atoms, were also compatible with this protocol, leading
to the corresponding products in 53−70% yields (Table 2,
entries 6−10). Notably, the desired product was obtained in
only 35% yield with 3-bromo-2-(bromomethyl)benzaldehyde
as the substrate, as most of the starting material underwent
nucleophilic substitution reaction with NaOAc (Table 2, entry
10). Furthermore, 2-bromomethyl aromatic aldehyde derived
from biphenyl could also run the reaction in 61% yield (Table
2, entries 11).
In addition to styrene 2a, a series of aryl alkenes bearing a
variety of substituents were subsequently examined. Methyl,
methoxyl, chloro, and fluoro substituents on the phenyl ring of
the styrenes were well tolerated, and the desired products
3ab−3al were successfully obtained in 61−76% yields. The
reaction efficiency was more sensitive to the position of the
substituent, and para-substituted styrenes exhibited higher
reactivities (Table 3, entries 2−4). No obvious electronic effect
was observed. Both electron-rich and -poor aryl alkenes could
react smoothly (Table 3, entries 2−10). Prop-1-en-2-ylbenzene
and (E)-prop-1-en-1-ylbenzene were also compatible with this
process but gave the corresponding products in moderate
yields, presumably due to the steric hindrance (Table 3, entries
11 and 12). It is noteworthy that the structure of the product
endo-3ae was confirmed by X-ray single-crystal diffraction
analysis.
c
93:7
93:7
93:7
c d
,
PdBr2
PdBr2
c e
,
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.50 mmol), 2a (0.75 mmol), [Pd] (5 mol
%), RuPhos (11 mol %), base (0.75 mmol), anisole (1.0 mL), CO (20
b
atm), 120 °C, 12 h. Combined yield (3aa + 3aa′) based on the
aldehyde and the ratio (3aa/3aa′) of the crude reaction mixture was
determined by GC and GC−MS analysis using n-tetradecane as the
internal standard. The yield in parentheses is the isolated yield (3aa +
c
d
e
3aa′). RuPhos (6 mol %). CO (40 atm). CO (60 atm).
delivering the desired product 3aa in 35% yield. This result
encouraged us to optimize the reaction conditions by screening
the catalyst precursor. To our delight, when PdBr2, Pd2(dba)3,
and Pd(PPh3)4 were introduced into the catalytic system, the
desired product 3aa could be obtained with high selectivity,
albeit in moderate yield. The simple PdBr2 was proved to be
the best catalyst precursor (Table 1, entries 7−12), but almost
no reaction took place when Pd(TFA)2 was used (Table 1,
entry 13). Further investigation of the ligands disclosed that
the RuPhos exhibited the highest efficiency. (See the
Pd from 2.2:1 to 1.2:1, the desired product was obtained in
64% yield (Table 1, entry 14). The yield rose to 82% when the
reaction was conducted under 60 atm of CO (Table 1, entry
16). Moreover, the temperature and solvent were assessed, yet
the variation of these parameters delivered no better results. As
expected, no desired product was observed in the absence of a
palladium catalyst or ligands.
Having the effective reaction conditions identified for this
transformation, the substrate scope and generality were next
explored. First, 2-(chloromethyl)benzaldehyde was tested
under the standard reaction conditions, which disclosed that
2126
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2125−2129