G. Szo˝llo˝si et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 333 (2010) 28–36
29
X1
CD modified Pd, was aimed to collect further experimental data
to ascertain the adsorption mode of the acid on the metal sur-
face. Due to the well-known hydrogenolysis of the C–Cl bond of
chloro-aromatics over Pd catalysts [32–34], we anticipated, that Cl
substituted acids are appropriate to indicate the sites of the acid in
contact with the surface. Thus, we prepared twelve derivatives of
(E)-2,3-diphenylpropenoic acid substituted at least with one Cl and
examined their hydrogenation on unmodified and CD-modified
Pd/Al2O3. The position of the Cl in the acid molecule was chosen
based on the effect of other substituents (F, CH3O and CH3 groups)
on the rate and ee and taking into account the possible arrange-
ments of the phenyl rings derived from theoretical calculations
[35].
Y
X2
COOH
(1a) X1 = H, X2 = Cl, Y = H
(1b) X1 = H, X2 = Cl, Y = MeO
(1c) X1 = H, X2 = Cl, Y = F
(1d) X1 = Cl, X2 = H, Y = H
(1e) X1 = Cl, X2 = H, Y = MeO
(1f) X1 = Cl, X2 = H, Y = F
(1g) X1 = MeO, X2 = H, Y = Cl
(1h) X1 = H, X2 = MeO, Y = Cl
(1i) X1 = H, X2 = F, Y = Cl
(1j) X1 = Cl, X2 = H, Y = Cl
(1k) X1 = H, X2 = Cl, Y = Cl
(1l) X1 = Cl, X2 = Cl, Y = H
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
Fig. 1. The structure of the Cl substituted (E)-2,3-diphenylpropenoic acids.
The catalyst used was a known commercial 5% Pd/Al2O3
(Engelhard, 40692) which was pretreated before use as described
earlier [26,27]. Cinchonidine (CD, Alfa Aesar, 99%), the ben-
N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, Scharlau, Multisolvent grade) and
H2 gas (Linde AG, 99.999%) were used as received. The substituted
(E)-2,3-diphenylpropenoic acid derivatives were prepared by the
Perkin condensation [26,27] and were purified by several crystal-
lizations in ethanol–water to over 98% purities. The acids were
(1H) and 100 MHz (13C) in d6-DMSO) and by GC–MS (Agilent Techn.
6890N GC–5973 MSD, 60 m HP-1MS capillary column) analysis of
the methyl esters formed by using CH2N2 ethereal solution (for
analytical data see the Supplementary material).
formed in excess were assumed to be S based on the rotation sign
[21–30] of the samples obtained after removal of CD and BA (Pola-
mat A polarimeter, the dextrorotatory enantiomers were formed in
excess) and based on the similar chromatographic behaviour of the
Cl substituted saturated products with the CH3O and F derivatives
obtained in previous studies [26,27].
2,3-diphenylpropanoic acid in increased ee in the presence of
BA [22,23]. In the hydrogenation of CH3O and/or F substituted
derivatives the ee further increased except with -phenyl-ortho-
substituents [24–27]. Beside the effect of the substituents on the
interaction strength of the acid with the modifier, the adsorp-
tion strengths of the acids were also affected by the substituents,
Chlorine substituted derivatives may suffer parallel or consec-
utive C–Cl bond hydrogenolysis (hydrodechlorination) of the
unsaturated or/and saturated acids resulting in the correspond-
ing dechlorinated acids (Scheme 1, 3 and 4). The ratio of the
adsorption mode of the substrate, i.e. the position of the Cl sub-
stituent. Thus, to obtain evidence on the adsorption mode of the
acids on the Pd surface we investigated the hydrogenation of
Cl substituted acids (Fig. 1). To be able to directly compare the
reactivity of the differently positioned Cl in the hydrogenolysis
reaction these derivatives included dichlorine substituted acids as
well.
2.2. Hydrogenation procedure and product analysis
The hydrogenations were carried out in a glass hydrogenation
apparatus under atmospheric H2 pressure and room tempera-
ture using magnetic agitation (1000 rpm). The H2 consumptions
between 0.15 and 0.25 equivalents (compared to the acid amount)
were used for calculating the initial H2-uptake rates (RiH). In a typ-
ical run 0.025 g catalyst was suspended in 3 cm3 DMF containing
2.5 vol% H2O, the apparatus was flushed with H2 and the catalyst
was pretreated for 0.5 h by stirring the slurry. After the pretreat-
ment 0.025 mmol CD, 0.5 mmol unsaturated acid and 0.5 mmol BA
(when used) in 2 cm3 solvent were added, the system was flushed
again with H2 and the reaction commenced by stirring the mixture.
filtered and washed with 5 cm3 methanol.
Portions (∼0.2–0.3 cm3) of the resulted solutions were concen-
trated in vacuum and used for the preparations of the methyl esters
(using CH2N2 ethereal solution). The resulted compounds were
identified by GC–MS analysis (see Supplementary material). Con-
versions (X (%)), chemoselectivities (Sel (%)) and enantioselectivities
(ee (%)) were calculated from the results of the gas chromato-
graphic analysis of these samples (YL6100 GC–FID) using chiral
capillary columns: Cyclosil-B (30 m × 0.25 mm, J&W Sci. Inc.,) and
ChiraldexTM G-TA (Astec, 40 m × 0.25 mm, Supelco). The ee was cal-
culated with the formulae: ee (%) = 100 × |[S] − [R]|/([S] + [R]); where
[S] and [R] are the concentrations of the product enantiomers.
Experiments carried out several times resulted in product compo-
sitions within 1%. The absolute configurations of the enantiomers
The results obtained in the hydrogenation of the acids 1a, 1b and
1c which contained Cl substituent in ortho position on the ␣-phenyl
ring are presented in Table 1 and Fig. 2.
The initial H2-uptake rates (RiH) in the hydrogenation of these
compounds showed similar trends as observed in the reactions
of other (E)-2,3-diphenylpropenoic acid derivatives [22–28], i.e.
decreased as effect of modification by CD and the presence of BA
increased the RiH over modified catalyst. We point on the following
observations: