125.76, 124.16, 123.57, 123.30, ꢁ120.28, 119.72, 109.88, 109.65,
7–11 which have a much lower tendency to crystallise. Their glass
transition temperatures range from 94–121 ꢁC. The highest glass
transition temperatures were determined for 3,6-dimethylcarba-
zole bearing derivatives 8 and 11 with 121 ꢁC and 119 ꢁC,
respectively.
21.45, 20.17. Tm: —ꢁC; Tg: 106 C.
4,40-Bis(9-carbazolyl)-2,20-dimethylbiphenyl
(CDBP),
4,40-bis(3,6-dimethylcarbazolyl)-2,20-dimethylbiphenyl (8), 4,40-
bis(9-carbazolyl)-2,20-bis(trifluoromethyl)biphenyl (9),30 4,40-
bis(3-methylcarbazolyl)-2,20-bis(trifluoromethyl)biphenyl (10),
and 4,40-bis(3,6-dimethylcarbazolyl)-2,20-bis(trifluoromethyl)-
biphenyl (11) were prepared according to the procedure given
for 7.
The main effect of the methyl substitution in 2- and 20-position
of the biphenyl unit is a twisting of the two central phenyl rings.
Due to this electronic decoupling, the conjugation length in the
molecule is limited which causes an increase of the triplet energy
DE (T1 ꢀ S0) from 2.58 eV for CBP to 2.95–2.97 eV for 7–11.
Fine-tuning of the energy levels, especially the HOMO levels,
can be achieved by a suitable choice of substitution pattern of the
CBP derivatives. Cyclic voltammetry with repeated cycles shows
that by introducing substituents at the 3- and 6-position of the
pendant carbazole units the oxidation to the radical cation
becomes fully reversible and thus electrochemical stable host
materials are accessible.
4,40-Bis(9-carbazolyl)-2,20-dimethylbiphenyl (CDBP). Yield:
1
0.59 g (50%). EI-MS m/z: 512 (100, M+). H-NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3), d (ppm): 8.20 (d, 4H), 7.58–7.45 (m, 14H), 7.36–7.31 (m,
4H), 2.31 (s, 6H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3), d (ppm): 140.96,
140.01, 137.95, 136.92, 130.81, 128.36, 125.94,ꢁ 124.34, 123.42,
120.36, 119.94, 109.94, 20.17. Tm: —ꢁC; Tg: 94 C.
4,40-Bis(3,6-dimethylcarbazolyl)-2,20-dimethylbiphenyl
(8).
Yield: 0.7 g (50%). EI-MS m/z: 568 (100, M+). H-NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3), d (ppm): 7.93 (ds, 4H), 7.52–7.40 (m, 10H), 7.26
(dd, 4H), 2.57 (s, 12H), 2.28 (s, 6H). 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3),
d (ppm): 139.64, 139.40, 137.82, 137.32, 130.75, 129.06, 128.01,
127.07, 123.98, 123.46, 120.22, 109.60, 21.45, 20.19. Tm: 277 ꢁC;
1
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Irene Bauer and Dr Michael Rothmann for
the help during synthesis and characterisation of the novel CBP
€
derivatives. We also thank Dr Ingo Munster, Dr Evelyn Fuchs
ꢁ
Tg: 121 C.
and Dr Nicolle Langer for fruitful discussions. Financial support
from the BMBF project TOPAS 2012 (FKZ 13N 10447) is
4,40-Bis(9-carbazolyl)-2,20-bis(trifluoromethyl)biphenyl (9).
Yield: 0.71 g (62%). EI-MS m/z: 620 (100, M+). H-NMR (300
€
gratefully acknowledged. P.S. thanks the Universitat Bayern e.V.
1
for a grant.
MHz, CDCl3), d (ppm): 8.20 (d, 4H), 8.09 (d, 2H), 7.93 (dd, 2H),
7.71 (d, 2H), 7.55–7.48 (m, 8H), 7.40–7.35 (m, 4H). 13C-NMR (75
MHz, CDCl3), d (ppm): 140.41, 138.33, 135.32, 133.49, 133.41,
References
2
130.90 (q, J(C-F) ¼ 31.5 Hz), 129.15, 126.48, 124.68, 123.83,
1 M. A. Baldo, D. F. O’Brian, Y. You, A. Shoustikov, S. Sibley,
M. E. Thompson and S. R. Forrest, Nature (London, U. K.), 1998,
395, 151–154.
123.44 (q, 1J(C-F) ¼ 272.3 Hz), 120.76, 120.60, 109.50. Tm:
232 ꢁC; Tg: 100 ꢁC.
2 D. F. O’Brian, M. A. Baldo, M. E. Thompson and S. R. Forrest,
Appl. Phys. Lett., 1999, 74(4), 442–444.
3 M. A. Baldo, S. Lamansky, P. E. Burrows, M. E. Thompson and
S. R. Forrest, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1999, 75, 4–6.
4 S. Tokito, T. Iijima, T. Tsuzuki and F. Sato, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2003,
83, 2459–2461.
5 C. Adachi, M. A. Baldo, M. E. Thompson and S. R. Forrest, J. Appl.
Phys., 2001, 90, 5048–5051.
6 S. Lamansky, P. Djurovich, D. Murphy, F. A. Razzaq, C. Adachi,
P. E. Burrows, S. R. Forrest and M. E. Thompson, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2001, 123, 4304–4312.
7 V. Adamovich, J. Brooks, A. Tamayo, A. M. Alexander,
P. Djurovich, B. W. D’Andrade, C. Adachi, S. R. Forrest and
M. E. Thompson, New J. Chem., 2002, 26, 1171–1178.
8 R. J. Holmes, S. R. Forrest, Y. J. Tung, R. C. Kwong, J. J. Brown,
S. Garon and M. E. Thompson, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2003, 82, 2422–
2424.
4,40-Bis(3-methylcarbazolyl)-2,20-bis(trifluoromethyl)biphenyl
(10). Yield: 0.8 g (55%). EI-MS m/z: 648 (100, M+). H-NMR
1
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d (ppm): 8.15 (d, 2H), 8.07 (d, 2H), 7.99 (m,
2H), 7.86 (dd, 2H), 7.68 (d, 2H), 7.54–7.30 (m, 10H), 2.60 (s, 6H).
13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3), d (ppm): 140.56, 138.66, 138.51,
2
135.10, 133.37, 130.82 (q, J(C-F) ¼ 30.8 Hz), 130.22, 128.90,
127.63, 126.20, 124.48, 123.99, 123.74, 123.46 (q, 1J(C-F) ¼ 273.8
Hz), 120.56, 120.50, 109.45, 109.22, 21.43. Tm: 210 ꢁC; Tg:
105 ꢁC.
4,40-Bis(3,6-dimethylcarbazolyl)-2,20-bis(trifluoromethyl)biphenyl
1
(11). Yield: 1.4 g (56%). EI-MS m/z: 676 (100, M+). H-NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3), d (ppm): 8.05 (d, 2H), 7.95 (m, 4H), 7.85 (dd,
2H), 7.66 (d, 2H), 7.42 (d, 4H), 7.30 (dd, 4H), 2.59 (s, 12H). 13C-
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3), d (ppm): 138.82, 138.71, 134.87, 133.34,
130.75 (q, 2J(C-F) ¼ 30.8 Hz), 130.00, 128.66, 127.46, 124.25, 123.91,
9 S. Tokito, T. Iijima, Y. Suzuri, H. Kita, T. Tsuzuki and F. Sato, Appl.
Phys. Lett., 2003, 83, 569–571.
10 I. Tanaka, Y. Tabata and S. Tokito, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2004, 400, 86–
89.
11 G. Lei, L. Wang and Y. Qiu, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2004, 85, 5403–5405.
12 E. L. Williams, K. Haavisto, J. Li and G. E. Jabbour, Adv. Mater.,
2007, 19, 197–202.
1
ꢁ
123.50 (q, J(C-F) ¼ 272.3 Hz), 120.46, 109.18, 21.43. Tm: 233 C;
Tg: 119 ꢁC.
13 S.-J. Su, H. Sasabe, T. Takeda and J. Kido, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20,
1691–1693.
14 J. He, H. Lui, X. Dai, X. Ou, J. Wang, S. Tao, X. Zhang, P. Wang and
D. Ma, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 6761–6767.
15 P. Strohriegl and J. V. Grazulevicius, Adv. Mater., 2002, 14, 1439–
1452.
16 Y. Shirota, J. Mater. Chem., 2000, 10, 1–25.
17 R. Schmechel and H. Von Seggern, Phys. Status Solidi A, 2004, 201,
1215–1235.
Conclusions
We have described a number of CBP derivatives in which the
substitution in the 2- and 20-position of the biphenyl and in the 3-
and 6-position of the carbazole unit is systematically varied. This
substitution of the parent crystalline CBP leads to the materials
2272 | J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 2266–2273
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011