In conclusion, supramolecular polymeric wires based on
discotic molecules provide attractive architectures for protein
assembly. The supramolecular materials provide access to
novel framework shapes, such as the columnar wires shown
here, on which proteins can be made to aggregate and interact.
On the supramolecular wire the proteins are brought to
assemble via a specific interaction with biotin ligands displayed
on the periphery. The approach shown here could also be
used to assemble differently labelled proteins and make them
interact as observed via inter-protein FRET.
The supramolecular approach is especially attractive as this
now opens the possibility to attract different types of proteins
to the scaffold simultaneously by utilizing mixtures of
dynamically assembling discotics decorated with a variety of
protein ligands. The supramolecular nature of the scaffold will
allow for easy access to different assembly compositions due to
the exchange of discotics within the wires,14,17 providing this
system with unique properties to tune protein assembly and as
functional material for energy transfer applications in chemical
and materials sciences. Additionally, this supramolecular
system might show potential as functional material at the
single-molecule level.
Fig. 3 Fluorescence spectra of a 1 : 1 mixture of TexasRed and Alexa
Fluor 633 labelled streptavidins (each 0.1 mM) incubated with 1 (black)
and 3 (red) (both at 1 mM). Spectra were recorded by using an
excitation wavelength of 584 nm, and measured in phosphate buffer
(pH 7.3).
dye and the discotic scaffold, and on the other hand to a steric
crowding by the large antibody assembling on the supra-
molecular wire. Both effects would result in a lower FRET
efficiency. The titration results thus show that the protein
efficiently assembles on the supramolecular wire and that the
protein characteristics direct the assembly process.
The research was supported via a Sofja Kovalevskaja
Award of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the
BMBF to LB.
Notes and references
In order to demonstrate the ability of the supramolecular
wire to act as a scaffold capable of inducing protein inter-
actions, two different streptavidins labelled with a FRET pair
(Alexa Fluor 633s and Texas Reds) were assembled on the
supramolecular assemblies formed by 3. The biotin–streptavidin
interaction should mediate the assembly of the streptavidins
on the supramolecular wires and as such facilitate approximation
of the FRET pair. This would lead to a decrease in TexasReds
emission (emmax = 612 nm) and an increase in Alexa Fluor
633s emission (emmax = 647 nm). Alexa Fluor 633-labelled
streptavidin (A633-SA) and TexasRed-labelled streptavidin
(TR-SA) were pre-incubated in a 1 to 1 ratio at a final
concentration of 0.1 mM of each protein. Fluorescence spectra
(excitation = 584 nm) were measured after the addition of 3,
or of 1 as control at 1 mM. The emission spectrum of the
FRET pair in the presence of assemblies formed by 1 (Fig. 3,
black line) is similar to that without discotic (Fig. S3, ESIz).
However in the presence of supramolecular assemblies of 3,
the donor signal of SA-TR almost disappears and the acceptor
fluorescence of SA-AF633 significantly increases (Fig. 3, red
curve). Even though the proteins are present at significantly
lower concentration than the discotic (0.1 vs. 1 mM), an almost
complete quenching of the SA-TR fluorescence is induced.
This effect can only result from the recognition and assembly
of the different streptavidins on the same supramolecular
platform. This protein assembly induces the proximity of
two fluorescently labelled proteins and enables non-radiative
energy transfer from SA-TR to SA-AF633.
1 L. A. Lee, Z. W. Niu and Q. Wang Q, Nano Res., 2009, 2, 349–364.
2 T. Douglas and M. Young, Science, 2006, 312, 873–875.
3 T. Scheibel, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2005, 16, 427–433.
4 M. G. Ryadnov, A. Bella, S. Timson and D. N. Woolfson, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 13240–13241.
5 J. E. Padilla, C. Colovos and T. O. Yeates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U. S. A., 2001, 98, 2217–2221.
6 G. A. Silva, C. Czeisler, K. L. Niece, E. Beniash, D. A. Harrington,
J. A. Kessler and S. I. Stupp, Science, 2004, 303, 1352–1355.
7 T.-F. Chou, C. So, B. R. White, J. C. T. Carlson, M. Sarikaya and
C. R. Wagner, ACS Nano, 2008, 2, 2519–2525.
8 K. Matsuura, K. Murasato and N. Kimizuka, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 10148–10149.
9 H. Kitagishi, Y. Kakikura, H. Yamaguchi, K. Oohora, A. Harada
and T. Hayashi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 1271–1274.
10 S. Burazerovic, J. Gradinaru, J. Pierron and T. R. Ward, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 5510–5514.
11 M. A. Kostiainen, O. Kasyutich, J. J. L. M. Cornelissen and
R. J. M. Nolte, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 394–399.
12 E. H. M. Lempens, I. van Baal, J. L. J. van Dongen,
T. M. Hackeng, M. Merkx and E. W. Meijer, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2009, 15, 8760–8767.
13 J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 151–160.
14 D. A. Uhlenheuer, K. Petkau and L. Brunsveld, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2010, 39, 2817–2826.
15 M. Felici, M. Marza-Perez, N. S. Hatzakis, R. J. M. Nolte and
M. C. Feiters, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 9914–9920.
16 L. Brunsveld, B. G. G. Lohmeijer, J. A. J. M. Vekemans and
E. W. Meijer, Chem. Commun., 2000, 2305–2306.
17 M. K. Muller and L. Brunsveld, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48,
¨
2921–2924.
18 H. Jung, T. Yang, M. D. Lasagna, J. Shi, G. D. Reinhart and
P. S. Cremer, Biophys. J., 2008, 94, 3094–3103.
19 N. M. Green, Methods Enzymol., 1990, 184, 51–67.
c
312 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 310–312
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011