Figure 2. Mechanistic design for cyclopropenium ion mediated
cyclization of diols to form cyclic ethers.
with extreme convenience through the use of reagents
readily amenable to steric and electronic modulation.
In the design of a cyclopropenium activated cyclodehy-
dration reaction, we expected that a diol substrate 6 would
react with an activated cyclopropene reagent 7 to form an
equilibrium mixture of cyclopropene acetal6 8 and the
corresponding cyclopropenium ether 9 (Figure 2). Intra-
molecular nucleophilic closure of this intermediate would
then furnish cyclic ether 10 with concomitant production
of cyclopropenone 11. Key to the success of this design
would of course be the ability to readily access monoacti-
vated intermediate 9 and the ability of the cyclopropenium
ion to sufficiently activate a hydroxyl group for displace-
ment by the relatively poor nucleophilic alcohol moiety.
To test the feasibility of this proposed design, we first
examined the reaction of commercially available (S,S)-2,5-
hexanediol (12) with 1,1-dichloro-2,3-diphenylcyclopro-
pene (15), prepared in situ from commercially available
2,3-diphenylcyclopropenone 13 by treatment with oxalyl
chloride. In fact, when 12 and was added to a mixture of 13
and oxalyl chloride in acetonitrile at room temperature,
(R,S)-2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran (14) was produced in
93% yield (1H NMR) as a 12:1 diastereomeric mixture
after 2 h (eq 1). This experiment thus demonstrates the
power of cyclopropenium activation to effect dehydration
in the context of ether linkages and is notable for its
relatively high rate of reaction, the complete absence of
elimination or chlorination side products, and the lack of
need for base to effect ring closure.
Figure 1. Cyclopropenium activation.
work encompasses two key developments in our cyclopro-
penium program, namely, (1) demonstration of the effec-
tiveness of alternative cyclopropenyl leaving groups in the
form of methanesulfonate ions and (2) extension of the
nucleophilic species to include alcohols.
Cyclic ethers are a prevalent motif in biologically active
compounds. Accordingly, numerous synthetic methods
have been developed to access this important class of
heterocycles.4 Although the dehydrative cyclization of
diols is one of the most conceptually straightforward
strategies by which to construct cyclic ethers, from a
practical standpoint methods to achieve these transforma-
tions often suffer from lack of selectivity, the need for
forcing conditions, or the use of reagents that are incon-
venient to prepare, leave undesirable byproducts, and lack
broad tunability.5 In contrast, we reasoned that cyclopro-
penium activation could offer a powerful alternative strat-
egy for diol cyclodehydration by combining high reactivity
(4) Heitmann, W.; Strehlke, G.; Mayer, D. Ethers, Aliphatic. In
Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2002.
(5) See the following selected papers for diol cyclodehydrations
using: Platinium: (a) Shibata, T.; Fujiwara, R.; Ueno, Y. Synlett,
2005, 152. Triphenylphosphine: (b) Barry, C. N.; Evans, S. A., Jr. J.
Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3361. (c) Robinson, P. L.; Barry, C. N.; Kelly,
J. W.; Evans, S. A., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 5210. DMSO:(d)
Gillis, B. T.; Beck, P. E. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 1388. Silver(I) oxide: (e)
Bouzide, A.; Sauve, G. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2329. Sulfuranes:(f) Martin,
J. C.; Franz, J. A.; Arhart, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 4604.
Triphosphonitrilic chloride:(g) Matuszko, A. J.; Chang, M. S. J. Org.
On the other hand, the incomplete stereospecificity
observed in this transformation suggested that simple
SN2 closure is not the exclusive reaction pathway. In
addition, we found that certain other substrates, especi-
ally those possessing primary alcohols, were prone to
ꢀ
€ €
ꢀ
Chem. 1966, 31, 2004. (h) Torok, B.; Bucsi, I.; Beregszaszi, T.; Kapocsi, I.;
ꢀ
Molnar, A. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1996, 107, 305. Heteropoly acids:(i)
Duffy, M. G.; Grayson, D. H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. I 2002, 1555.
Methanesulfonyl chloride:(j) Mihailovic, M. L.; Gojkovic, S.; Cekovic,
Z. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. I 1972, 2460.
(6) For a review on cyclopropenone acetals, see: Nakamura, M.;
Isobe, H.; Nakamura, E. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1295.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 4, 2011
741