As part of our continuing interest5 in exploring these
[Cu(phen)2]þ rotaxanes and catenanes as photosynthetic
model systems, we have explored alternative demetalation
strategies for preparation of copper-free fullereno-rotaxanes
and -catenanes to compare their photophysical properties
with those of the corresponding [Cu(phen)2]þ systems.
A potential demetalating agent was serendipitously discov-
ered during our attempts to develop a protocol for the
synthesis of [Cu(phen)2]þ-[2]catenanes using Huisgen-1,3-
dipolar-cycloaddition (CuAAC or “click” chemistry).5a In
order to remove residual copper catalyst that might bind to
coordinating sites in triazole-linked catenanes, we intro-
duced an extra step into the workup procedure. This consis-
ted of dissolving the crude product in dichloromethane
(DCM), followed by washing the organic solution with
aqueous ammonium hydroxide solution (NH4OH). To
our surprise, the final isolated material after this workup
procedure was the Cu-free [2]catenane.
Figure 2. Partial 1H NMR spectra of catenate 1 and the corre-
sponding catenand 2 (400 MHz, CD2Cl2, 298 K). For assign-
ments, see Figure 1.
rings relative to one another that occurs upon demeta-
lation.1a-c The phenyl protons (Ho and Hm, Figure 2)
attached to the phen moieties move downfield revealing
that the two chelates are no longer entwined around the
Cu(I) complex. The upfield shifts observed for prorons
Figure 1. [2]catenate 1 and the corresponding [2]catenand 2.
After demetalation, a reorientation of the constituent rings
results in a molecular conformation with the two phen ligands
located away from each other.
This unexpected result suggested that NH4OH might
be a generally applicable reagent for demetalation of
[Cu(phen)2]þ-based interlocked molecules. We therefore
decided to systematically investigate the effects of NH4OH
on [Cu(phen)2]þ-based catenanes and rotaxanes. The first
system studied was the prototypical [2]catenate 1 (Figure
1).5d,6 Treatment of an acetonitrile (ACN) solution of 1 with
a large excess of NH4OH resulted in demetalation of 1 after 1
h at room temperature to give 2 (for details, see Supporting
Information). Since the solution of 1 is dark red and the
solution of 2 is colorless, the demetalation process could be
easily monitored by eye. The crude product was extracted
with DCM, extensively washed with water and purified by
column chromatography to afford the Cu-free [2]catenand 2
as a waxy solid in very good yield (88%).
0
0
H4 , H5 , Hb, and Hd suggest that the triazole-linked phenyl
ring is engaged in π-π interactions with the nearby phen
moiety, revealing that catenand 2 roughly adopts the
configuration depicted in Figure 1. For comparison, cate-
nate 1 was also demetalated with KCN under classical
conditions,1a-c and the 1H NMR spectrum of the KCN-
demetalated system (Figure not shown) was identical to
that shown in Figure 2.
MALDI-TOF spectrometry confirmed the interlocked
structure of 2, showing the molecular ion at m/z 1389.06
(M þ H3O)þ (m/z 1370.58 calculated for C80H78N10O12)
and the characteristic fragmentation pattern of catenanes,1d
namely stepwise fragmentation of the constituent rings.
Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)
analysis was used to attest the quality of the Cu-free
catenanes. ICP-MS revealed residual copper level of less
than 250 ppm for the NH4OH treated material and of less
than 240 ppm for the KCN analog. These data clearly
show that both methods are highly effective in removing
copper from the [Cu(phen)2]þ core of catenate 1.
To obtain further insight into the demetalation reaction
of 1 with NH4OH, the progress of the reaction was mon-
itored by UV-vis spectroscopy (Figure 3) at 440 nm, which
is the absorption maximum of the [Cu(phen)2]þ complex.3
For comparison, a control experiment using the classical
KCN demetalation procedure was performed with catenate
1 (Figure not shown). As can be seen, the absorption in the
1H NMR analysis (see Figure 2) of the isolated product
revealed the well-known reorientation of the interlocked
(5) (a) Megiatto, J. D., Jr.; Schuster, D. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 12872–12873. (b) Megiatto, J. D., Jr.; Schuster, D. I. Chem.;Eur.
J. 2009, 15, 5444–5448. (c) Megiatto, J. D., Jr.; Spencer, R.; Schuster,
D. I. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4152–4155. (d) Megiatto, J. D., Jr.; Schuster,
D. I. New J. Chem. 2010, 34, 276–286. (d) Megiatto, J. D., Jr.; Schuster,
D. I.; Abwandner, S.; de Miguel, G.; Guldi, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 3847–3861. (e) Megiatto, J. D., Jr.; Li, K.; Schuster, D. I.;
Palkar, A.; Herranz, M. A.; Echegoyen, L.; Abwandner, S.; de Miguel,
G.; Guldi., D. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 14408–14419. (f)
Megiatto, J. D., Jr.; Spencer, R.; Schuster, D. I. J. Mat. Chem. 2011,
1544–1550.
(6) Sauvage proposed the names catenates for interlocked systems
bearing transition-metal-complex (also called metalocatenanes) and
catenand for the corresponding metal-free structure. See refs 1a-1c.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 7, 2011
1809