Z. Jiang et al. / Catalysis Communications 57 (2014) 14–18
15
Scheme 2. Synthesis of DADPP.
as a white solid (720 mg, 62% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.44–
6.96 (m, 28H), 4.70 (s, 2H), 3.71 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 4H) ppm. 13C NMR
(101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 148.27, 137.77, 133.05, 128.32, 123.64, 120.52,
81.85, 77.48 and 53.95 ppm. 31P NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3):
δ −26.23 ppm. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calc for [C39H34N2P2 Na]+: 615.2089;
found: 615.2090.
presence of Na2CO3 (Table 1, entry 3). Furthermore, after screening var-
ious solvents (Table 1, entries 3, 6–9), DMA was found to be an optimum
solvent in this reaction system.
Subsequently, we devoted much effort to screen palladium species.
It was found that other palladium precursors such as PdCl2, Pd(dba)2
and Pd(COD)Cl2 also could give the relatively satisfying results except
Pd(OAc)2 (Table 2, entries 1, 3–5 and 7). However, when the molar
ratio of substrate to catalyst (S/C) was increased to 5,000, the obvious
difference of the catalytic results was shown with the different palladi-
um precursors (Table 2, entries 2, 6 and 8). Among them, [Pd(C3H5)Cl]2
gave the best result in 87% yield with a TON of 4,350 (Table 2, entries 1).
Thus, [Pd(C3H5)Cl]2 was chosen as the catalyst precursor in the following
experiments. Compared with other well-known simple ligands, such as
dppe, dppb, P-Phos and Bisbi, the bidentate phosphine ligand L, DADPP
was favourable for accelerating the reaction (Table 2, entries 10–14). A
low yield of 6% was obtained in the absence of ligand DADPP (Table 2,
entry 9). Based on these optimization studies (Tables 1 and 2), further re-
actions were performed at 130 °C under nitrogen using [Pd(C3H5)Cl]2/
DADPP, Na2CO3 in DMA.
2.2. General procedure for the Heck coupling
Na2CO3 (212 mg, 2 mmol), 4-chloronitrobenzene (1 mmol) and
styrene (1.5 mmol) were added successively into a dried Schlenk
tube under nitrogen. Then the DMA (0.1 mL) solution of DADPP
(0.002 mmol) and [Pd(C3H5)Cl]2 (0.0005 mmol), which was reacted at
100 °C for 10 min prior to use, was added into the mixture. The reaction
was performed at 130 °C. At the end of reaction, the mixture solution was
extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL). Combined organic phase was
washed with brine (3 × 5 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The dried solution
was filtered and purified with silica gel chromatography (petroleum
ether 60–90 °C) to give a corresponding product.
With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, we explored the
scope of the halide substrates for Heck coupling. As expected, for
low-cost and less-active aryl chlorides, this catalytic system gave
low yields in the presence of 0.1 mol.% Pd. However, when the
Pd loading was increased to 0.2 mol.%, 2-chloronitrobenzene, 4-
chlorobenzonitrile and 2-chlorobenzonitrile could afford the correspond-
ing coupling products 2–4 in moderate yields of 71%, 52% and 48%, re-
spectively (Table 3, entries 2–4). However, for 4-chlorobenzaldehyde,
only a moderate yield of 60% was achieved even if increasing Pd loading
to 1 mol.% (Table 3, entry 5). The low reactivity was usually attributed
to the reluctance of the aryl-chloride bond to oxidative addition to
Pd(0) [1]. Under the optimized reaction conditions, good to excellent
3. Results and discussion
To evaluate the catalytic reactivity of [Pd(C3H5)Cl]2/DADPP system,
the coupling of 4-chloronitrobenzene with styrene was used as a
model reaction to explore the optimum conditions. According to the
well-established mechanism [21–23], bases are crucial for the regener-
ation of the Pd active species. The effect of NaOAc, NaHCO3, Na2CO3,
K3PO4 and NaOH on the reaction was investigated in DMA (Table 1).
Desired product was almost not observed when NaOAc or NaHCO3
was used as the base (Table 1, entries 1–2). K3PO4 obviously promoted
the reaction, but a low conversion of 36% was obtained (Table 1, entry
4). Gratifyingly, the highest conversion of 100% was obtained in the
Table 2
Effect of palladium precursors and ligands on the Heck coupling reactiona.
Table 1
Effect of bases and solvents on Heck reaction of 4-chloronitrobenzene with styrenea
Entry
Pd
Ligand
DADPP
S/C
Yield (%)
1
[Pd(C3H5)Cl]2
1,000
5,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
5,000
1,000
5,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
94b
87
78
24
93
53
82
21
6c
85
77
71
80
6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
PdCl2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(dba)2
DADPP
DADPP
DADPP
Entry
Base
Solvent
S/C
Yield (%)
Pd(COD)Cl2
DADPP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
NaOAc
NaHCO3
Na2CO3
K3PO4
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
n-butanol
NMP
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
–
–
[Pd(C3H5)Cl]2
[Pd(C3H5)Cl]2
[Pd(C3H5)Cl]2
[Pd(C3H5)Cl]2
[Pd(C3H5)Cl]2
[Pd(C3H5)Cl]2
none
P-Phos
Bisbi
dppe
dppb
L
100
36
20
–
36c
NaOH
b
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
Na2CO3
b
EtOH
DMF
–
45
aReaction condition: 4-chloronitrobenzene 1 mmol, styrene 1.5 mmol, Na2CO3 2.0 mmol,
DMA 3 mL, catalyst [Pd(C3H5)Cl]2/DADPP = 1/4, 130 °C, 20 h, GC yield, 2,2′,6,6′-
Tetramethoxy-4,4′-bis(diphenylphosphino)-3,3′-bipyridine (P-Phos), 2,2′-bis(diphenyl-
phosphinomethyl)-1,1′-biphenyl (Bisbi) and 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)-butane (dppb).
b2 h.
aReaction condition: 4-chloronitrobenzene 1 mmol, styrene 1.5 mmol, catalyst [Pd(C3H5)
Cl]2/DADPP = 1/4, [Pd] 0.1 mol.%, base 2.0 mmol, solvent 3 mL, 130 °C, 20 h and GC
yield.
b70 °C.
c110 °C.
cNo ligand.