LETTER
Regioselective Deacetylation of Trisaccharide
3025
acetyl groups of the galactose unit of Lewis X trisaccha-
ride 12 were selectively cleaved by very mild transesteri-
fication with a freshly prepared solution of catalytic
sodium methoxide in methanol. Interestingly, when the
pH value did not exceed 7.5 (wet pH indicator), it was
possible to obtain 13 as a single regioisomer in 94% yield,
with unaffected O-acetyl groups on the fucose moiety af-
ter neutralization with the acidic ion-exchanger Am-
berlyst 15. The NMR spectrum of 13 displays the typical
downfield shifts of protons H3 and H4 on the fucose moi-
ety that bear O-acetyl protecting groups. However, when
the same reaction was performed at pH 8.5–9.0, the com-
pletely deacetylated Lewis X trisaccharide was obtained
after 20 hours at room temperature. We presume that the
methoxide ion in catalytic amounts initially attacks the
acetyl group on the most readily accessible 3-position of
the galactose unit. Subsequently, intramolecular acetyl
transfer occurs which leads to the removal of the O-acetyl
groups from the adjacent 2-OH and 4-OH positions in the
galactose. It appears that this acetyl migration does not ap-
ply to the two O-acetyl groups on the fucose moiety.
References and Notes
(1) (a) Moore, K. L.; Stults, N. L.; Diaz, S.; Smith, D. F.;
Cummings, R. D.; Varki, A.; McEver, R. P. J. Cell Biol.
1992, 118, 445. (b) Sperandio, M. FEBS J. 2006, 273, 4377.
(c) Carlow, D. A.; Gossens, K.; Naus, S.; Veerman, K. M.;
Seo, W.; Ziltener, H. J. Immunol. Rev. 2009, 230, 75.
(2) Xia, L. J.; Ramachandran, V.; McDaniel, J. M.; Nguyen, K.
N.; Cummings, R. D.; McEver, R. P. Blood 2003, 101, 552.
(3) (a) Baumann, K.; Kowalczyk, D.; Kunz, H. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3445. (b) Baumann, K.; Kowalczyk, D.;
Gutjahr, T.; Pieczyk, M.; Jones, C.; Wild, M. K.; Vestweber,
D.; Kunz, H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3174.
(4) Pudelko, M.; Bull, J.; Kunz, H. ChemBioChem 2010, 11,
904.
(5) (a) Dziadek, S.; Kowalczyk, D.; Kunz, H. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 7624. (b) Brocke, C.; Kunz, H. Synlett 2003,
2052.
(6) Brocke, C.; Kunz, H. Synthesis 2004, 525.
(7) Wittmann, V.; Lennartz, D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 1363.
(8) Hanessian, S.; Lavallee, P. Can. J. Chem. 1975, 53, 2975.
(9) (a) Windmüller, R.; Schmidt, R. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,
35, 7927. (b) Zhu, T.; Boons, G.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 10222.
(10) Sato, S.; Mori, M.; Ito, Y.; Ogawa, T. Carbohydr. Res. 1986,
155, C6.
(11) Kunz, H.; Unverzagt, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988,
27, 1697.
(12) Sakagami, M.; Hamana, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
5547.
(13) Schmidt, R. R.; Michel, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1980, 19, 731.
(14) Marra, A.; Sinaÿ, P. Carbohydr. Res. 1990, 195, 303.
(15) (a) Liebe, B.; Kunz, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997,
36, 618. (b) Filser, C.; Kowalczyk, D.; Jones, C.; Wild, M.
K.; Ipe, U.; Vestweber, D.; Kunz, H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2007, 46, 2108.
Taking advantage of this highly regioselective deacetyla-
tion of 12, the reaction of 13 with the sialyl donor 614 ac-
cording to previously published methodology6,15 using
AgOTf/Me–S–Br promoting system stereo- and regiose-
lectively gave the tetrasaccharide 14 in 76% yield, thereby
exploiting the nitrile effect.16 Acetylation of the 2-OH and
4-OH groups of the galactose unit gave the sialyl Lewis X
15 in 90% yield. It is worth noting that the anomeric
TBDPS group remained unaffected during all these con-
versions towards 15 (Scheme 2).
In conclusion, we have efficiently synthesized the sialyl
Lewis X tetrasaccharide 15 using an altered protective
group strategy concerning the glucosamine acceptor 9 and
the fucose donor 8. The key step in this synthesis is the re-
gioselective deacetylation of three out of five hydroxy
groups of a Lewis X trisaccharide 12 using very mild
transesterification protocol,17 in which a strict control of
the pH was a pivotal feature. It is also worth noting, that
the glycosylation of typically unreactive 4-hydroxy group
of the disaccharide unit 11 with the galactosyl donor 7
proceeds with high yield. Further work towards the tet-
rasaccharide oxazoline 5 and the hexasaccharide 1 repre-
senting the building block for solid-phase synthesis of
glycopeptide 2 is currently in progress.
(16) (a) Schmidt, R. R.; Rücker, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21,
1421. (b) Ratcliffe, A. J.; Fraser-Reid, B. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 747.
(17) Typical Procedure for Regioselective O-Deacetylation of
the Trisaccharide 12: Trisaccharide 12 (2.11 g, 1.69 mmol)
was dissolved in MeOH (150 mL) and freshly prepared
NaOMe solution in MeOH was added carefully until pH 7.5
was obtained. Reaction was performed at r.t. and monitored
by TLC every 30 min. After completion of the reaction (4 h
40 min), the mixture was neutralized with Amberlyst 15 to
pH 6–6.5. The resin was removed by filtration, washed with
MeOH, and the filtrate was concentrated under vacuum to
give the crude 13 (1.78 g, 94% yield) as a white amorphous
material. Trisaccharide 13 can be additionally purified on
silica gel with EtOAc as eluent (Rf 0.35 in EtOAc).
Spectroscopic data for 13: [a]24D –26.6 (c = 2.00, MeOH). 1H
NMR (COSY, CD3OD): d = 7.66–7.72 (4 H, m, Har), 7.19–
7.39 (21 H, m, Har), 5.30–5.34 (2 H, m, H1-Fuc {5.33}, H3-
Fuc {5.32}), 5.22 (1 H, d, H4-Fuc, J3,4 = 2.6 Hz), 5.04–5.06
(1 H, m, H5-Fuc), 4.29–4.80 (8 H, m, CH2Bn-2a {4.78},
CH2-Bn-1a {4.66}, H1-GlcNAc {4.60}, CH2Bn-1b {4.58},
CH2Bn-2b {4.45}, CH2Bn-3a {4.44}, H1-Gal {4.42},
Supporting Information for this article is available online at
experimental procedures and spectroscopic characterization data
for compounds 11, 12, 14, and 15.
CH2Bn-3b {4.30}), 4.06 (1 H, t*, H4-GlcNAc, J3,4 @ J4,5
@
9.3 Hz), 3.92–3.96 (1 H, m, H3-GlcNAc), 3.77–3.86 (5 H,
m, H6a,b-Gal {3.85}, H6a-GlcNAc {3.84}, H2-Fuc {3.82},
H4-Gal {3.78}), 3.40–3.47 (3 H, m, H2-Gal {3.46}, H5-Gal
{3.43}, H6b-GlcNAc {3.42}), 3.30–3.35 (2 H, m, H3-Gal
{3.33}, H2-GlcNAc {3.31}), 3.07–3.10 (1 H, m, H5-
GlcNAc), 2.03, 1.94, 1.80 (9 H, 3 × s, MeAc), 1.05 (9 H, s,
Me-t-Bu), 1.04 [3 H, d, Me(6)-Fuc, J5,6 = 6.5 Hz]. 13C NMR
(BB, HSQC, 100.6 MHz, CD3OD): d = 173.18, 172.48,
Acknowledgment
M.P. is grateful for the stipend provided by the Alexander von
Humboldt Foundation. Support from the Deutsche Forschungs-
gemeinschaft is gratefully acknowledged.
Synlett 2010, No. 20, 3023–3026 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York