Having demonstrated that the [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrange-
ment and chain extension from C(7) to C(9) on 8 was indeed
feasible, we studied the IrelandÀClaisen rearrangement7,13
for the stereoselective installation of the tertiary methine
C(11) in the sessilifoliamides. Acylation of alcohol 8 (still as
a 6:1 mixture of C(9a) diastereomers derived from 19) with
butyric acid under carbodiimide coupling conditions pro-
vided ester 25 in 92% yield (Scheme 7). Enolization with
LiHMDS in a THF/HMPA mixture14 followed by trapping
with TBSCl provided the (Z)-silyl ketene acetal as the sole
Scheme 5. Segment Condensation, RCM, and Synthesis of
Linchpin Intermediate 8
1
stereoisomer according to H NMR analysis of the crude
reaction product. The subsequent thermal rearrangement in
toluene led to an approximately 2:1 ratio of silyl esters 26a
and 26b, which were treated with TBAF followed by TMS-
diazomethane to give the corresponding methyl esters. Un-
fortunately, both the yield of the four-step sequence and the
ratio of diastereomeric products 27a and 27b remained low
(21% yield, 2.2:1 dr) despite attempts to optimize the reaction
time, temperature, and solvent polarity.
Becauseof thestructural similarity of21 and stemoamide,11
we decided to complete the remaining three steps to the
tricyclic core of this natural product. Iodolactonization of
21 and reduction of the resulting iodide proceeded in 98%
and 97% yield, respectively, to give 23 as a 6:1 mixture of
C(9a) diastereomers. Chromatographic removal of the
remaining C(9a) isomer provided the major isomer of 23
in 71% yield for this step. Finally, lactone R-methylation
led to 8-epi-stemoamide (24). While many syntheses of
stemoamide and its stereoisomers have been reported,12
our effort represents the first synthesis of the C(8) epimer.
Scheme 7. TBS-Mediated IrelandÀClaisen Rearrangement of 8
Scheme 6. Conversion of 8 to (À)-8-epi-Stemoamide
A significant improvement in this key transformation
could be achieved after an analysis of the competing transi-
tion states of the IrelandÀClaisen rearrangement (Scheme 8).
Specifically, we noticed that the orientation of the trialkylsilyl
group was remarkably different in 29q and 30q and therefore
offered an opportunity to influence the course of the reaction.
We hypothesized that a significant increase in the size of the
alkyl groups on silicon would likely selectively destabilize
chair transition state 30q, where the silyl group is positioned
underneath the 7-membered ring during the CÀC bond
formation, and be more readily tolerated in boat transi-
tion state 29q, in which the silyl group is kept distant from
the 5,7-ring system. This hypothesis could be readily put
to test (Scheme 9). IrelandÀClaisen rearrangement of the
TIPS-silyl ketene acetal, formed by enolization of 25 in
the presence of TIPSCl, required heating at reflux in
degassed15 xylenes for 3 h to go to completion. The
resulting 31a and 31b were again converted to the methyl
esters to simplify analysis.
Additionally, among the plethora of synthetic approaches
to stemoamide, this is the first example of a [3,3]-rearrange-
ment to install the C(9) stereocenter in this ring system.
(11) Lin, W.; Ye, Y.; Xu, R. J. Nat. Prod. 1992, 55, 571.
(12) (a) Williams, D. R.; Reddy, J. P.; Amato, G. S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1994, 35, 6417. (b) Khim, S.-K.; Schultz, A. G. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
7734. (c) Bogliotti, N.; Dalko, P. I.; Cossy, J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
9528. (d) Kohno, Y.; Narasaka, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69, 2063.
(e) Bates, R. W.; Sridhar, S. Synlett 2009, 12, 1979. (f) Jacobi, P. A.; Lee,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3409. (g) Jacobi, P. A.; Lee, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4295. (h) Kinoshita, A.; Mori, M. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 8356. (i) Kinoshita, A.; Mori, M. Heterocycles 1997, 46, 287.
(j) Sibi, M. P.; Subramanian, T. Synlett 2004, 1211. (k) Olivo, H. F.;
ꢀ
Tovar-Miranda, R.; Barragan, E. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3287.
(13) Ireland, R. E.; Mueller, R. H.; Willard, A. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1976, 98, 2868.
(14) (a) Ireland, R. E.; Wipf, P.; Armstrong, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1991,
56, 650. (b) Ireland, R. E.; Wipf, P.; Xiang, J. N. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
3572.
(l) Torssell, S.; Wanngren, E.; Somfai, P. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
4246. (m) Gao, P.; Tong, Z.; Hu, H.; Xu, P.-F.; Liu, W.; Sun, C.; Zhai,
H. Synlett 2009, 2188. (n) Wang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Hong, R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2787. (o) Honda, T.; Matsukawa, T.;
Takahashi, K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 673.
2636
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 10, 2011