particularly in comparing 4 with 5. This is easiest seen
when comparing the structures upon the addition of an
electron and the subsequent stabilization of the radical
anion, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of some diimide molecules.
benzene, naphthalene, perylene, and linear anthracene
diimide small molecules (Figure 1) have received attention
for their high electron affinities, high electron mobility,
excellent thermal and oxidative stability, and finally, ro-
ꢀ
12
bustness vis-a-vis environmental stresses. They are,
therefore, promising candidates for a variety of organic
electronic applications.
Figure 2. Rational for the design of 5. In 4 the radical anion
cannot be stabilized without disturbing the aromatic sextets
(400).
Compared to work on naphthalene and perylene
(rylene) diimides,13 there have been very few reports on
benzene and anthracene diimides.14 Devices based on the
latter, bearing the same N-substituents, exhibit mobilities
an order of magnitude lower than the naphthalene and
perylene analogues.11d This result is probably related to
their structural difference, possibly five- vs six-membered
imide rings (Figure 1).
Herein, we report the synthesis of a new monomer for
polyimides as well as an electron-deficient semiconductor
based on the previously unknown anthracene-1,9:5,10-
tetracarboxylic diimide containing six-membered imide
rings 5aꢀd. We also report ab initio molecular orbital
calculations of electron distribution in anthracene diimides
of 4 and 5.
Figure 2 shows that even though in both cases one gains
an aromatic sextet upon addition of an electron to 4 and 5,
providing a driving force for this process. However,
whereas in 5 the spin and charge find themselves adjacent
to a carbonyl for further stabilization by delocalization
(50), in 4 two aromatic sextets need to be sacrificed for the
equivalent stabilization (400). This concept was verified by
electrochemical results (vide infra). In fact, 5 is a slightly
stronger acceptor than 3and a much stronger acceptor than 4.
Scheme 1 outlines the synthetic route for compound 5.
The synthesis started with acid chloride formation, fol-
lowed by intramolecular FriedelꢀCrafts cyclization reac-
tion of 9,10-bis(carboxymethyl)anthracene 6 to produce 7
The design of molecules 5 was based on a relatively
simple valence bond view of the anthracene nucleus,
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Anthracene Diimides 5aꢀc. a
(11) (a) Katz, H. E.; Lovinger, A. J.; Johnson, J.; Kloc, C.; Siegrist,
T.; Li, W.; Lin, Y. Y.; Dodabalapur, A. Nature 2000, 404, 478. (b)
Chesterfield, R. J.; McKeen, J.; Newman, C. R.; Frisbie, C. D. J. Appl.
Phys. 2004, 95, 6396. (c) Jones, B. A.; Ahrens, M. J.; Yoon, M.;
Facchetti, A.; Marks, T. J.; Wasielewski, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2004, 43, 6363. (d) Zhan, X.; Facchetti, A.; Barlow, S.; Marks, T. J.;
Ratner, M. A.; Wasielewski, M. R.; Marder, S. R Adv. Mater. 2011, 23,
268.
(12) Joes, B. A.; Facchetti, A.; Wasielewski, M. R.; Marks, T. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15259.
(13) (a) Jones, B. A.; Facchetti, A.; Marks, T. J.; Wasielewski, M. R.
Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 2703. (b) Katz, H. E.; Johnson, J.; Lovinger,
A. J.; Li, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7787. (c) Chen, H. Z.; Ling,
M. M.; Mo, X.; Shi, M. M.; Wang, M.; Bao, Z. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19,
816. (d) Ling, M. M.; Erk, P.; Gomez, M.; Koenemann, M.; Locklin, J.;
Bao, Z. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1123. (e) Oh, J. H.; Lee, W.-Y.; Torsten,
€
N.; Chen, W.-C.; Konemann, M.; Bao, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133,
4204.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) SOCl2, 80 °C, (ii) AlCl3,
ClCH2CH2Cl; (b) PBr5, chlorobenzene; (c) DMSO, 100 °C; (d) Oxone,
acetic acid; (e) n-alkylamine, 80 °C.
(14) (a) Zheng, Q.; Huang, J.; Sarjeant, A.; Katz, H. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 14410. (b) Wang, Z.; Kim, C.; Facchetti, A.; Marks, T. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13362.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 10, 2011
2561