A. Loudet et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 1849–1851
1851
Two possibilities were envisaged to account for the fact that the
Acknowledgments
fluorescence of the acceptor is not observed for cassette 2 in the
cytoplasm, lysosomes and in the ER. The first is that the energy
transfer from the donor to the acceptor became inefficient in the
environment of those intracellular regions. The second hypothesis
is that fluorescence from the acceptor becomes quenched in the
cytoplasm, lysosomes and in the ER, but not in the mitochondria.
These alternatives could be distinguished by exciting the localized
cassettes at the acceptor absorption maximum; under these condi-
tions the acceptor would be visible if the first hypothesis applied,
but not in the second case. In the event, when 2 was excited di-
rectly at 543 nm, that is, at the acceptor part, only red emission
from the mitochondria could be observed (Fig. 3, bottom). No red
signal was seen in the ER, cytosol or the lysosomes, suggesting
the fluorescence from the cyanine acceptor is quenched in these
environments. However, the energy transfer cannot be complete
otherwise residual fluorescence from the donor parts would not
be seen in the intracellular regions that fluoresce green.
We thank The National Institute of Health (GM087981) and The
Robert A. Welch Foundation (A-1121) for the financial support for
this work.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures for the prepara-
tion of cassettes 1 and 2, photophysical studies, and additional cell
imaging experiments (particularly colocalization)) associated with
this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/
References and notes
Invitrogen Corporation, 2006.
In summary, cassette 1 targeted the ER and lysosomes, the en-
ergy transfer observed for this cassette was near-perfect in both
these environments, that is, it always fluoresced red. Conversely,
cassette 2 targeted a different set of organelles and fluoresced with
different colors: mitochondria (red), cytoplasm including the ER
(green), and lysosomes (green).
2. Oakley, B. R.; Xiang, X. Mycol. Ser. 2008, 26, 513.
3. Zorov, D. B.; Kobrinsky, E.; Juhaszova, M.; Sollott, S. J. Circ. Res. 2004, 95,
239.
4. Jiao, G.-S.; Thoresen Lars, H.; Burgess, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14668.
5. Burgess, K. U.S. Patent 2005/0032120 A1, The Texas A&M University System,
USA, US, 2005, 7.
6. Burgess, K. U.S. Patent 2005/0032120 The Texas A&M University System US,
2009; 24.
Cassette 1 has a neutral BODIPY-based acceptor fragment, while
2 has a cationic cyanine; this structural difference is most likely the
origin of acceptor fluorescence quenching in some organelles, but
just for the cyanine-based cassette 2. Further, the fluorescence of
cyanines tends to be influenced by membrane potential effects.8–13
Overall, these data lead to a general conclusion that may be obvi-
ous, but is not often considered: some organelle specific dyes
may be widely distributed in cells but only seen in regions where
their fluorescence is not quenched. In general, organelle-selective
energy transfer such as observed here may open new horizons
for intracellular imaging.
7. Wu, L.; Loudet, A.; Barhoumi, R.; Burghardt, R. C.; Burgess, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 9156.
8. Waggoner, A. S. Methods Enzymol. 1979, 55, 689.
9. Benson, R. C.; Kues, H. A. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1977, 22, 379.
10. Johnson, L. V.; Walsh, M. L.; Bockus, B. J.; Chen, L. B. J. Cell Biol. 1981, 88,
526.
11. Wilson, H. A.; Seligmann, B. E.; Chused, T. M. J. Cell. Physiol. 1985, 125, 61.
12. Liu, Z.; Bushnell, W. R.; Brambl, R. Plant Physiol. 1987, 84, 1385.
13. Patsenker, L. D.; Tatarets, A. L.; Terpetschnig, E. A. In Advanced Fluorescence
Reporters in Chemistry and Biology I: Fundamentals and Molecular Design;
Demchenko, A. P. Ed.; 2010; pp 65–104.