Mendeleev Commun., 2011, 21, 92–93
Hm-Tol
β2-H
B-bands). The nature of the aryl substituent in the magnesium
β1-H
α1-H
β3-H
α3-H
complex insignificantly affects the character of the spectra and
the positions of the absorption band maxima. Figure 1 shows the
UV-VIS of complex 1a in tetrahydrofuran as an example.
The mass spectra (MALDI-TOF) of the complexes obtained
exhibit molecular ion peaks which contain signals matching the
isotopic composition of magnesium.
α2-H
2.01 3.97
4.24 6.20 2.25
2.10
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
1
Complexes 1 were also characterised by H and 13C NMR
spectroscopy. The signals in the spectra were assigned using two-
dimensional (2D) techniques. Figure 2 presents a 1H–1H COSY
spectrum of complex 1c having characteristic cross-peaks as an
example. A specific feature of the spectrum is that the signals
of a3-H protons are shifted upfield by 2.39 ppm with respect to
those of a1-H protons; this effect is because the former are located
in the shielding cone of the aryl substituent arranged orthogonally
to the macrocycle plane. A similar effect, albeit not so pronounced,
is also observed for the b3-HAr and b2-HAr protons, which are
shielded by 0.58 and 0.32 ppm, respectively, relative to b1-HAr.
Conversely, in the case of a2-H protons, weak deshielding of signals
by 0.09 ppm with respect to a1-H is observed, which suggests that
weakening of the magnetic effect of the meso-aryl group occurs.
The signals of carbon atoms in the 13C NMR spectrum of 1c were
assigned using 1H–13C COSY and DEPT-135 techniques, as well
as the scarce literature data.5 Note that the methine carbon atom in
1c is deshielded (d 125.88) with respect to the meso-unsubstituted
analogue,5 which displays the corresponding signal at d 104.6.
The magnesium complexes 1 can be readily demetallated to
give free 27-aryl-29H,31H-tetrabenzo[5,10,15]triazaporphyrins 2.
N
Me
N
N
N
Mg
N
N
α3-H
β3-H
9.0
9.5
N
α1-H
α2-H
β1-H
β2-H
9.5
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
d/ppm
Figure 2 1H–1H COSY NMR spectrum of compound 1c (aromatic region)
in DMSO-d6.
In fact, treatment of compound 1a with concentrated sulfuric
acid gave the respective ligand 2a in a quantitative yield;§ it was
characterised by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (see Online
Supplementary Materials, Figure 1S) and UV-VIS spectroscopy
(Figure 1). The electronic spectrum of this ligand, similarly to that
of compounds 1 with C2v symmetry, is also characterised by a
split Q-band. It is evident from Figure 1 that demetallation
increases the degree of this splitting: the Q1 component is shifted
hypsochromically by 5 nm, whereas the Q2 band shows a batho-
chromic shift of 15 nm.
1.0
0.8
2a
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1a
The ligand 2 has been proved to be promising in syntheses of
sandwich rare-earth metal complexes that represent a new type
of complexes of these elements.
300
400
500
600
700
800
l/nm
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2011.03.011.
Figure 1 Electronic absorption spectra of magnesium complex 1a and the
corresponding free-base ligand 2a in THF.
For 1c: yield 10%. UV-VIS [THF, lmax/nm (I/Imax)]: 397 (0.432), 444
(0.180), 594 (0.173), 619 (0.187), 648 (0.653), 670 (1.000). 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6) d: 9.53 (d, 2H, b2-HAr, J 7.5 Hz), 9.43–9.45 (m, 4H, b1-HAr),
8.23–8.26 (m, 4H, g1-HAr), 7.93–7.99 (m, 6H, g2-HAr, Hm-Tol), 7.67 (t, 2H,
g3-HAr, J 7.5 Hz), 7.05 (d, 2H, b3-HAr, J 8.1 Hz), 2.65 (s, 3H, HMe). 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6) d: 155.32, 152.30, 151.16, 138.63 (C-5, C-7, C-12, C-14, C-19,
C-21, C-26, C-28), 141.73, 141.64 (Cm-Tol-1, Cm-Tol-3), 139.35, 139.06, 138.85,
138.22 (C-4a, C-7a, C-11a, C-14a, C-18a, C-21a, C-25a, C-28a), 132.24,
130.02, 129.10, 128.76 (Cm-Tol-2, Cm-Tol-4, Cm-Tol-5, Cm-Tol-6), 129.72, 129.42
(C-9, C-10, C-16, C-17), 127.64 (C-2, C-24), 126.92 (C-3, C-23), 125.88
(C-27), 124.30 (C-1, C-25), 122.74, 122.54, 122.45 (C-4, C-8, C-11,
C-15, C-18, C-22), 21.25 (C–Me). MS (MALDI-TOF), m/z: 626 [M+].
For characteristics of complexes 1b,d,e, see Online Supplementary
Materials.
References
1 D. R. Teller, S. K. DeMeutter and B. Kaletta, US Patent 5134048, 1992
(Chem. Abstr., 1992, 116, 146001m).
2 G. E. Renzoni, D. C. Schindele, L. J. Theodore, C. C. Leznoff, K. L.
Fearon and B. V. Pepich, US Patent 5135717, 1992.
3 W. B. Dandliker and Mao-Lin Hsu, US Patent 5641878, 1997 (Chem.
Abstr., 1997, 127, 965P).
4 J. Silver, K. R. Rickwood and M. T. Ahmet, US Patent 5318912, 1994
(Chem. Abstr., 1994, 121, 1034P).
5 A. N. Cammidge, M. J. Cook, D. L. Hughes, F. Nekelson and M. Rahman,
Chem. Commun., 2005, 930.
6 C. E. Dent, J. Chem. Soc., 1938, 1.
7 P. A. Barrett, R. P. Linstead, G. A. P. Tuey and J. M. Robertson, J. Chem.
Soc., 1939, 1809.
‡
A mixture of phthalodinitrile (0.77 g), phenylacetonitrile (0.18 g) and
magnesium powder (0.11 g) was irradiated at 600 W for 8 min in a
8 C. C. Leznoff and N. B. McKeown, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 2186.
9 N. E. Galanin, E. V. Kudrik and G. P. Shaposhnikov, Zh. Org. Khim.,
2002, 38, 1251 (Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 38, 1200).
10 N. E. Galanin, E. V. Kudrik and G. P. Shaposhnikov, Zh. Obshch. Khim.,
2005, 75, 689 (Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2005, 75, 651).
11 E. G. Kogan, A. V. Ivanov, L. G. Tomilova and N. S. Zefirov, Mendeleev
Commun., 2002, 54.
Samsung M1915NR microwave oven to afford compound 1a, yield 11%.
§
27-Phenyl-29H,31H-tetrabenzo[b,g,l,q][5,10,15]triazaporphyrin 2a.
The magnesium complex 1a (10 mg, 0.016 mmol) was dissolved in con-
centrated H2SO4 and kept for 1 min, then poured onto ice. The precipitate
was filtered off, washed consecutively with H2O to neutral pH and 80%
aqueous MeOH (3×20 ml) and finally dried in vacuo.Yield 98%. UV-VIS
[THF, lmax/nm (I/Imax)]: 380 (0.719), 590 (0.257), 617 (0.369), 643 (0.658),
685 (1.000). MS (MALDI-TOF), m/z: 589 [M+].
Received: 21st July 2010; Com. 10/3571
– 93 –